Cargando…
How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer
Earlier access to lung cancer specialist (LCS) care improves survival, highlighting the need for streamlined patient referral. International guidelines recommend 14-day maximum time intervals from general practitioner (GP) referral to first LCS appointment (“GP–LCS interval”), and diagnosis to treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0045-2018 |
_version_ | 1784792756480114688 |
---|---|
author | Malalasekera, Ashanya Nahm, Sharon Blinman, Prunella L. Kao, Steven C. Dhillon, Haryana M. Vardy, Janette L. |
author_facet | Malalasekera, Ashanya Nahm, Sharon Blinman, Prunella L. Kao, Steven C. Dhillon, Haryana M. Vardy, Janette L. |
author_sort | Malalasekera, Ashanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Earlier access to lung cancer specialist (LCS) care improves survival, highlighting the need for streamlined patient referral. International guidelines recommend 14-day maximum time intervals from general practitioner (GP) referral to first LCS appointment (“GP–LCS interval”), and diagnosis to treatment (“treatment interval”). We compared time intervals in lung cancer care against timeframe benchmarks, and explored barriers and facilitators to timely care. We conducted a scoping review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and hand searches. Primary end-points were GP–LCS and treatment intervals. Performance against guidelines and factors responsible for delays were explored. We used descriptive statistics and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests to compare intervals in studies reporting fast-track interventions. Of 1343 identified studies, 128 full-text articles were eligible. Only 33 (26%) studies reported GP–LCS intervals, with an overall median of 7 days and distributions largely meeting guidelines. Overall, 52 (41%) studies reported treatment intervals, with a median of 27 days, and distributions of times falling short of guidelines. There was no effect of fast-track interventions on reducing time intervals. Lack of symptoms and multiple procedures or specialist visits were suggested causes for delay. Although most patients with lung cancer see a specialist within a reasonable timeframe, treatment commencement is often delayed. There is regional variation in establishing timeliness of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9488868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94888682022-11-14 How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer Malalasekera, Ashanya Nahm, Sharon Blinman, Prunella L. Kao, Steven C. Dhillon, Haryana M. Vardy, Janette L. Eur Respir Rev Review Earlier access to lung cancer specialist (LCS) care improves survival, highlighting the need for streamlined patient referral. International guidelines recommend 14-day maximum time intervals from general practitioner (GP) referral to first LCS appointment (“GP–LCS interval”), and diagnosis to treatment (“treatment interval”). We compared time intervals in lung cancer care against timeframe benchmarks, and explored barriers and facilitators to timely care. We conducted a scoping review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and hand searches. Primary end-points were GP–LCS and treatment intervals. Performance against guidelines and factors responsible for delays were explored. We used descriptive statistics and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests to compare intervals in studies reporting fast-track interventions. Of 1343 identified studies, 128 full-text articles were eligible. Only 33 (26%) studies reported GP–LCS intervals, with an overall median of 7 days and distributions largely meeting guidelines. Overall, 52 (41%) studies reported treatment intervals, with a median of 27 days, and distributions of times falling short of guidelines. There was no effect of fast-track interventions on reducing time intervals. Lack of symptoms and multiple procedures or specialist visits were suggested causes for delay. Although most patients with lung cancer see a specialist within a reasonable timeframe, treatment commencement is often delayed. There is regional variation in establishing timeliness of care. European Respiratory Society 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9488868/ /pubmed/30158277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0045-2018 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Review Malalasekera, Ashanya Nahm, Sharon Blinman, Prunella L. Kao, Steven C. Dhillon, Haryana M. Vardy, Janette L. How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title | How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title_full | How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title_fullStr | How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title_short | How long is too long? A scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
title_sort | how long is too long? a scoping review of health system delays in lung cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0045-2018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malalasekeraashanya howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer AT nahmsharon howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer AT blinmanprunellal howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer AT kaostevenc howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer AT dhillonharyanam howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer AT vardyjanettel howlongistoolongascopingreviewofhealthsystemdelaysinlungcancer |