Cargando…

Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions

Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targetin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrara, Giovanni, Luppi, Fabrizio, Birring, Surinder S., Cerri, Stefania, Caminati, Antonella, Sköld, Magnus, Kreuter, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017
_version_ 1784792775476117504
author Ferrara, Giovanni
Luppi, Fabrizio
Birring, Surinder S.
Cerri, Stefania
Caminati, Antonella
Sköld, Magnus
Kreuter, Michael
author_facet Ferrara, Giovanni
Luppi, Fabrizio
Birring, Surinder S.
Cerri, Stefania
Caminati, Antonella
Sköld, Magnus
Kreuter, Michael
author_sort Ferrara, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targeting the disease. BSC improves survival in patients with different types of cancer. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience a vast range of symptoms during the natural history of the disease and might have a beneficial effect of BSC interventions. This review highlights the current evidence on interventions targeting QoL and gaps for the clinical assessment of BSC in the treatment of IPF patients. Very few interventions to improve QoL or improve symptom control are currently supported by well-designed studies. Sound methodology is paramount in evaluating BSC in IPF, as well as the use of validated tools to measure QoL and symptom control in this specific group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9488950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94889502022-11-14 Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions Ferrara, Giovanni Luppi, Fabrizio Birring, Surinder S. Cerri, Stefania Caminati, Antonella Sköld, Magnus Kreuter, Michael Eur Respir Rev Review Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targeting the disease. BSC improves survival in patients with different types of cancer. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience a vast range of symptoms during the natural history of the disease and might have a beneficial effect of BSC interventions. This review highlights the current evidence on interventions targeting QoL and gaps for the clinical assessment of BSC in the treatment of IPF patients. Very few interventions to improve QoL or improve symptom control are currently supported by well-designed studies. Sound methodology is paramount in evaluating BSC in IPF, as well as the use of validated tools to measure QoL and symptom control in this specific group of patients. European Respiratory Society 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9488950/ /pubmed/29436402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Review
Ferrara, Giovanni
Luppi, Fabrizio
Birring, Surinder S.
Cerri, Stefania
Caminati, Antonella
Sköld, Magnus
Kreuter, Michael
Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title_full Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title_fullStr Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title_short Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
title_sort best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017
work_keys_str_mv AT ferraragiovanni bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT luppifabrizio bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT birringsurinders bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT cerristefania bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT caminatiantonella bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT skoldmagnus bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections
AT kreutermichael bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections