Cargando…
Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions
Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targetin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017 |
_version_ | 1784792775476117504 |
---|---|
author | Ferrara, Giovanni Luppi, Fabrizio Birring, Surinder S. Cerri, Stefania Caminati, Antonella Sköld, Magnus Kreuter, Michael |
author_facet | Ferrara, Giovanni Luppi, Fabrizio Birring, Surinder S. Cerri, Stefania Caminati, Antonella Sköld, Magnus Kreuter, Michael |
author_sort | Ferrara, Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targeting the disease. BSC improves survival in patients with different types of cancer. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience a vast range of symptoms during the natural history of the disease and might have a beneficial effect of BSC interventions. This review highlights the current evidence on interventions targeting QoL and gaps for the clinical assessment of BSC in the treatment of IPF patients. Very few interventions to improve QoL or improve symptom control are currently supported by well-designed studies. Sound methodology is paramount in evaluating BSC in IPF, as well as the use of validated tools to measure QoL and symptom control in this specific group of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9488950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94889502022-11-14 Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions Ferrara, Giovanni Luppi, Fabrizio Birring, Surinder S. Cerri, Stefania Caminati, Antonella Sköld, Magnus Kreuter, Michael Eur Respir Rev Review Best supportive care (BSC) is generally defined as all the interventions and the multiprofessional approach aimed to improve and optimise quality of life (QoL) in patients affected by progressive diseases. In this sense, it excludes and might be complementary to other interventions directly targeting the disease. BSC improves survival in patients with different types of cancer. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience a vast range of symptoms during the natural history of the disease and might have a beneficial effect of BSC interventions. This review highlights the current evidence on interventions targeting QoL and gaps for the clinical assessment of BSC in the treatment of IPF patients. Very few interventions to improve QoL or improve symptom control are currently supported by well-designed studies. Sound methodology is paramount in evaluating BSC in IPF, as well as the use of validated tools to measure QoL and symptom control in this specific group of patients. European Respiratory Society 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9488950/ /pubmed/29436402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Review Ferrara, Giovanni Luppi, Fabrizio Birring, Surinder S. Cerri, Stefania Caminati, Antonella Sköld, Magnus Kreuter, Michael Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title | Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title_full | Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title_fullStr | Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title_short | Best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
title_sort | best supportive care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current gaps and future directions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0076-2017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferraragiovanni bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT luppifabrizio bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT birringsurinders bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT cerristefania bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT caminatiantonella bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT skoldmagnus bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections AT kreutermichael bestsupportivecareforidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosiscurrentgapsandfuturedirections |