Cargando…

Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries

Asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases; in the majority of patients it is well controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, but the management of severe asthma has been a significant challenge historically. The introduction of novel biologic drugs in the pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paoletti, Giovanni, Pepys, Jack, Casini, Marta, Di Bona, Danilo, Heffler, Enrico, Goh, Celine Y.Y., Price, David B., Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0278-2021
_version_ 1784792785803542528
author Paoletti, Giovanni
Pepys, Jack
Casini, Marta
Di Bona, Danilo
Heffler, Enrico
Goh, Celine Y.Y.
Price, David B.
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
author_facet Paoletti, Giovanni
Pepys, Jack
Casini, Marta
Di Bona, Danilo
Heffler, Enrico
Goh, Celine Y.Y.
Price, David B.
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
author_sort Paoletti, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases; in the majority of patients it is well controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, but the management of severe asthma has been a significant challenge historically. The introduction of novel biologic drugs in the past few decades has revolutionised the field, presenting physicians with a variety of biologic drugs with different mechanisms for the treatment of severe asthma. It is of crucial importance to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs by following their “real-life” effectiveness rather than relying solely on their efficacy, established in carefully designed clinical trials, which therefore do not necessarily match the profile of the real-life patient. Understanding the actual effectiveness of the specific drugs in real-life patients is a crucial part of tailoring the right drugs to the right patients. Registries serve as an important tool in obtaining real-life evidence, since they are in effect observational studies, following the entire patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9489006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94890062022-11-14 Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries Paoletti, Giovanni Pepys, Jack Casini, Marta Di Bona, Danilo Heffler, Enrico Goh, Celine Y.Y. Price, David B. Canonica, Giorgio Walter Eur Respir Rev Reviews Asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases; in the majority of patients it is well controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, but the management of severe asthma has been a significant challenge historically. The introduction of novel biologic drugs in the past few decades has revolutionised the field, presenting physicians with a variety of biologic drugs with different mechanisms for the treatment of severe asthma. It is of crucial importance to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs by following their “real-life” effectiveness rather than relying solely on their efficacy, established in carefully designed clinical trials, which therefore do not necessarily match the profile of the real-life patient. Understanding the actual effectiveness of the specific drugs in real-life patients is a crucial part of tailoring the right drugs to the right patients. Registries serve as an important tool in obtaining real-life evidence, since they are in effect observational studies, following the entire patient population. European Respiratory Society 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9489006/ /pubmed/35675922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0278-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Reviews
Paoletti, Giovanni
Pepys, Jack
Casini, Marta
Di Bona, Danilo
Heffler, Enrico
Goh, Celine Y.Y.
Price, David B.
Canonica, Giorgio Walter
Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title_full Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title_fullStr Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title_full_unstemmed Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title_short Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
title_sort biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35675922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0278-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT paolettigiovanni biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT pepysjack biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT casinimarta biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT dibonadanilo biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT hefflerenrico biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT gohcelineyy biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT pricedavidb biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries
AT canonicagiorgiowalter biologicsinsevereasthmatheroleofrealworldevidencefromregistries