Cargando…

Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owlia, Fatemeh, Zarezadeh, Faezeh, Jambarsang, Sara, Kazemipoor, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070
_version_ 1784792866217787392
author Owlia, Fatemeh
Zarezadeh, Faezeh
Jambarsang, Sara
Kazemipoor, Maryam
author_facet Owlia, Fatemeh
Zarezadeh, Faezeh
Jambarsang, Sara
Kazemipoor, Maryam
author_sort Owlia, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two maxillary central incisors, belonging to participants aged 35–67 years, were included in this survey. At last, 51 diabetic patients were allocated to each group of well-controlled (HbA1C < 7) and uncontrolled (HbA1C ≥ 7). Electric and cold pulpal vitality tests were conducted for all teeth. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and the multiple linear regression model. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Based on the results of this study, the mean value of response to EPT was 4.51 ± 2.06 and 4.41 ± 1.85 in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients, respectively. Also, the pulpal responses to cold and EPT tests had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tooth responses to the cold and EPT sensibility tests were not different in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients. Despite no statistically significant correlation, male diabetic patients in the uncontrolled group showed a lower sensory response threshold to EPT compared to a well-controlled group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9489380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94893802022-09-21 Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Owlia, Fatemeh Zarezadeh, Faezeh Jambarsang, Sara Kazemipoor, Maryam Int J Dent Research Article INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two maxillary central incisors, belonging to participants aged 35–67 years, were included in this survey. At last, 51 diabetic patients were allocated to each group of well-controlled (HbA1C < 7) and uncontrolled (HbA1C ≥ 7). Electric and cold pulpal vitality tests were conducted for all teeth. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and the multiple linear regression model. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Based on the results of this study, the mean value of response to EPT was 4.51 ± 2.06 and 4.41 ± 1.85 in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients, respectively. Also, the pulpal responses to cold and EPT tests had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tooth responses to the cold and EPT sensibility tests were not different in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients. Despite no statistically significant correlation, male diabetic patients in the uncontrolled group showed a lower sensory response threshold to EPT compared to a well-controlled group. Hindawi 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9489380/ /pubmed/36148044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fatemeh Owlia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Owlia, Fatemeh
Zarezadeh, Faezeh
Jambarsang, Sara
Kazemipoor, Maryam
Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparison of the response to pulpal sensibility tests in well-controlled and uncontrolled type ii diabetes mellitus patients: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070
work_keys_str_mv AT owliafatemeh comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT zarezadehfaezeh comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT jambarsangsara comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT kazemipoormaryam comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy