Cargando…
Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070 |
_version_ | 1784792866217787392 |
---|---|
author | Owlia, Fatemeh Zarezadeh, Faezeh Jambarsang, Sara Kazemipoor, Maryam |
author_facet | Owlia, Fatemeh Zarezadeh, Faezeh Jambarsang, Sara Kazemipoor, Maryam |
author_sort | Owlia, Fatemeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two maxillary central incisors, belonging to participants aged 35–67 years, were included in this survey. At last, 51 diabetic patients were allocated to each group of well-controlled (HbA1C < 7) and uncontrolled (HbA1C ≥ 7). Electric and cold pulpal vitality tests were conducted for all teeth. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and the multiple linear regression model. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Based on the results of this study, the mean value of response to EPT was 4.51 ± 2.06 and 4.41 ± 1.85 in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients, respectively. Also, the pulpal responses to cold and EPT tests had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tooth responses to the cold and EPT sensibility tests were not different in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients. Despite no statistically significant correlation, male diabetic patients in the uncontrolled group showed a lower sensory response threshold to EPT compared to a well-controlled group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9489380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94893802022-09-21 Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Owlia, Fatemeh Zarezadeh, Faezeh Jambarsang, Sara Kazemipoor, Maryam Int J Dent Research Article INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder in which impairment of sensory fibers would be anticipated. The present study would assess the dental pulp response to cold and EPT sensibility tests in patients with type 2 diabetes, both well-controlled and uncontrolled. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two maxillary central incisors, belonging to participants aged 35–67 years, were included in this survey. At last, 51 diabetic patients were allocated to each group of well-controlled (HbA1C < 7) and uncontrolled (HbA1C ≥ 7). Electric and cold pulpal vitality tests were conducted for all teeth. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and the multiple linear regression model. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Based on the results of this study, the mean value of response to EPT was 4.51 ± 2.06 and 4.41 ± 1.85 in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients, respectively. Also, the pulpal responses to cold and EPT tests had no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tooth responses to the cold and EPT sensibility tests were not different in well-controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients. Despite no statistically significant correlation, male diabetic patients in the uncontrolled group showed a lower sensory response threshold to EPT compared to a well-controlled group. Hindawi 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9489380/ /pubmed/36148044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fatemeh Owlia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Owlia, Fatemeh Zarezadeh, Faezeh Jambarsang, Sara Kazemipoor, Maryam Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Comparison of the Response to Pulpal Sensibility Tests in Well-Controlled and Uncontrolled Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | comparison of the response to pulpal sensibility tests in well-controlled and uncontrolled type ii diabetes mellitus patients: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36148044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6197070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT owliafatemeh comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT zarezadehfaezeh comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT jambarsangsara comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT kazemipoormaryam comparisonoftheresponsetopulpalsensibilitytestsinwellcontrolledanduncontrolledtypeiidiabetesmellituspatientsacrosssectionalstudy |