Cargando…

An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Before advancing to clinical trials, new drugs are screened for their pro‐arrhythmic potential using a method that is overly conservative and provides limited mechanistic insight. The shortcomings of this approach can lead to the mis‐classification of beneficial drugs as pro‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Alexander P., Wei, Siyu, Kalola, Darshan, Krogh‐Madsen, Trine, Christini, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15915
_version_ 1784792920839159808
author Clark, Alexander P.
Wei, Siyu
Kalola, Darshan
Krogh‐Madsen, Trine
Christini, David J.
author_facet Clark, Alexander P.
Wei, Siyu
Kalola, Darshan
Krogh‐Madsen, Trine
Christini, David J.
author_sort Clark, Alexander P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Before advancing to clinical trials, new drugs are screened for their pro‐arrhythmic potential using a method that is overly conservative and provides limited mechanistic insight. The shortcomings of this approach can lead to the mis‐classification of beneficial drugs as pro‐arrhythmic. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: An in silico–in vitro pipeline was developed to circumvent these shortcomings. A computational human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocyte (iPSC‐CM) model was used as part of a genetic algorithm to design experiments, specifically electrophysiological voltage clamp (VC) protocols, to identify which of several cardiac ion channels were blocked during in vitro drug studies. Such VC data, along with dynamically clamped action potentials (AP), were acquired from iPSC‐CMs before and after treatment with a control solution or a low‐ (verapamil), intermediate‐ (cisapride or quinine) or high‐risk (quinidine) drug. KEY RESULTS: Significant AP prolongation (a pro‐arrhythmia marker) was seen in response to quinidine and quinine. The VC protocol identified block of I(Kr) (a source of arrhythmias) by all strong I(Kr) blockers, including cisapride, quinidine and quinine. The protocol also detected block of I(CaL) by verapamil and I(to) by quinidine. Further demonstrating the power of the approach, the VC data uncovered a previously unidentified I(f) block by quinine, which was confirmed with experiments using a HEK‐293 expression system and automated patch‐clamp. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We developed an in silico–in vitro pipeline that simultaneously identifies pro‐arrhythmia risk and mechanism of ion channel‐blocking drugs. The approach offers a new tool for evaluating cardiotoxicity during preclinical drug screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9489646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94896462022-12-30 An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms Clark, Alexander P. Wei, Siyu Kalola, Darshan Krogh‐Madsen, Trine Christini, David J. Br J Pharmacol Research Articles BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Before advancing to clinical trials, new drugs are screened for their pro‐arrhythmic potential using a method that is overly conservative and provides limited mechanistic insight. The shortcomings of this approach can lead to the mis‐classification of beneficial drugs as pro‐arrhythmic. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: An in silico–in vitro pipeline was developed to circumvent these shortcomings. A computational human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocyte (iPSC‐CM) model was used as part of a genetic algorithm to design experiments, specifically electrophysiological voltage clamp (VC) protocols, to identify which of several cardiac ion channels were blocked during in vitro drug studies. Such VC data, along with dynamically clamped action potentials (AP), were acquired from iPSC‐CMs before and after treatment with a control solution or a low‐ (verapamil), intermediate‐ (cisapride or quinine) or high‐risk (quinidine) drug. KEY RESULTS: Significant AP prolongation (a pro‐arrhythmia marker) was seen in response to quinidine and quinine. The VC protocol identified block of I(Kr) (a source of arrhythmias) by all strong I(Kr) blockers, including cisapride, quinidine and quinine. The protocol also detected block of I(CaL) by verapamil and I(to) by quinidine. Further demonstrating the power of the approach, the VC data uncovered a previously unidentified I(f) block by quinine, which was confirmed with experiments using a HEK‐293 expression system and automated patch‐clamp. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We developed an in silico–in vitro pipeline that simultaneously identifies pro‐arrhythmia risk and mechanism of ion channel‐blocking drugs. The approach offers a new tool for evaluating cardiotoxicity during preclinical drug screening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-24 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9489646/ /pubmed/35781252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15915 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Clark, Alexander P.
Wei, Siyu
Kalola, Darshan
Krogh‐Madsen, Trine
Christini, David J.
An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title_full An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title_fullStr An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title_short An in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
title_sort in silico–in vitro pipeline for drug cardiotoxicity screening identifies ionic pro‐arrhythmia mechanisms
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15915
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkalexanderp aninsilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT weisiyu aninsilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT kaloladarshan aninsilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT kroghmadsentrine aninsilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT christinidavidj aninsilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT clarkalexanderp insilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT weisiyu insilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT kaloladarshan insilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT kroghmadsentrine insilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms
AT christinidavidj insilicoinvitropipelinefordrugcardiotoxicityscreeningidentifiesionicproarrhythmiamechanisms