Cargando…

Analysis of the role of m6A and lncRNAs in prognosis and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of m6A and lncRNAs in the prognosis and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma, construct the risk score of overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma, and search for new therapeutic targets and drugs. METHODS: The data used in this study are obtained from The Cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yan, Liu, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10612
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To study the role of m6A and lncRNAs in the prognosis and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma, construct the risk score of overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma, and search for new therapeutic targets and drugs. METHODS: The data used in this study are obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A total of 424 HCC samples were included. The co-expression of lncRNAs and M6A-related genes in HCC was analyzed, COX regression analysis was conducted to construct the risk score for HCC prognosis, and the model's validity was further verified in different clinical trials subtypes and principal component analysis. GO enrichment analysis and immune function analysis were performed for the differential genes in the high-risk group and the low-risk group divided by risk score and analyzed the prognostic effect of TMB on the two groups. Based on the results, potential therapeutic agents for HCC were screened. RESULTS: The risk score can better predict the prognosis of HCC, the area under the ROC curve is 0.727. Differential genes were mainly located in the extracellular matrix and chromosomal regions and may play regulatory roles in binding sites and catalytic enzymes, thereby affecting the chromosome division and cell proliferation of cells. Type Ⅱ IFN response, type Ⅰ IFN response and MHC class Ⅰ were the three most different functions in terms of immune function between the high-risk group and the low-risk group. Type II IFN response, type I IFN response was significantly down-regulated in the high-risk group, while MHC class I was up-regulated. 14 potential therapeutic drugs were screened out. CONCLUSIONS: The risk score constructed with NRAV and AL031985.3 had a good predictive effect on the prognosis of HCC. Differences in genes and immune function between high-risk and low-risk groups promoted the occurrence and progression of HCC.