Cargando…
Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection
BACKGROUND: We estimate effectiveness of 3 versus 2 vaccine doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron in a mostly infection-naiive but highly vaccinated Australian population. METHODS: Cohort study of adults aged 40+ years resident in Sydney followed from 1 January 2022 for SARS-CoV-2 infection and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.029 |
_version_ | 1784792989887889408 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Bette Gidding, Heather Stepien, Sandrine Cretikos, Michelle Macartney, Kristine |
author_facet | Liu, Bette Gidding, Heather Stepien, Sandrine Cretikos, Michelle Macartney, Kristine |
author_sort | Liu, Bette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We estimate effectiveness of 3 versus 2 vaccine doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron in a mostly infection-naiive but highly vaccinated Australian population. METHODS: Cohort study of adults aged 40+ years resident in Sydney followed from 1 January 2022 for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation or death using linked immunisation, disease notification and hospitalisation registers. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and corresponding relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) were estimated comparing 3 to 2 vaccine dose recipients by time since dose receipt, vaccine brand, and prior infection. Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to boost by age groups were calculated. RESULTS: 2,053,123 infection-naiive individuals (mean age 59 years) were followed for 327,272 person-years for infection and 224,269 person-years for severe outcomes (hospitalisation/death). There were 175,849 infections and 4113 hospitalisations/deaths. Compared to individuals receiving dose 2 within the last 3 months, rVE in dose 3 recipients was 7% (95% CI 5–9%) against infection and 65% (95%CI 61–69%) against hospitalisation/death. Almost all dose 3 recipients had an mRNA vaccine; there was little difference in dose 3 rVE by primary course vaccine brand (ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2). Over the 6-week follow-up, we estimated one hospitalisation/death was avoided for every 192 adults aged ≥70 years boosted with dose 3 in the infection-naiive cohort. The aHR for hospitalisation/death from Omicron was 0.12 (95 %CI 0.07–0.23) for 2-dose recipients with a prior Delta infection compared with 2-dose recipients with no prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of a third COVID-19 vaccine dose in adults aged 40 years and above significantly reduced hospitalisations and deaths from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections in a primarily infection-naiive population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9489983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94899832022-09-21 Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection Liu, Bette Gidding, Heather Stepien, Sandrine Cretikos, Michelle Macartney, Kristine Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: We estimate effectiveness of 3 versus 2 vaccine doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron in a mostly infection-naiive but highly vaccinated Australian population. METHODS: Cohort study of adults aged 40+ years resident in Sydney followed from 1 January 2022 for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation or death using linked immunisation, disease notification and hospitalisation registers. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and corresponding relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) were estimated comparing 3 to 2 vaccine dose recipients by time since dose receipt, vaccine brand, and prior infection. Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to boost by age groups were calculated. RESULTS: 2,053,123 infection-naiive individuals (mean age 59 years) were followed for 327,272 person-years for infection and 224,269 person-years for severe outcomes (hospitalisation/death). There were 175,849 infections and 4113 hospitalisations/deaths. Compared to individuals receiving dose 2 within the last 3 months, rVE in dose 3 recipients was 7% (95% CI 5–9%) against infection and 65% (95%CI 61–69%) against hospitalisation/death. Almost all dose 3 recipients had an mRNA vaccine; there was little difference in dose 3 rVE by primary course vaccine brand (ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2). Over the 6-week follow-up, we estimated one hospitalisation/death was avoided for every 192 adults aged ≥70 years boosted with dose 3 in the infection-naiive cohort. The aHR for hospitalisation/death from Omicron was 0.12 (95 %CI 0.07–0.23) for 2-dose recipients with a prior Delta infection compared with 2-dose recipients with no prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of a third COVID-19 vaccine dose in adults aged 40 years and above significantly reduced hospitalisations and deaths from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections in a primarily infection-naiive population. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-10-12 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9489983/ /pubmed/36180375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.029 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Bette Gidding, Heather Stepien, Sandrine Cretikos, Michelle Macartney, Kristine Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title | Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full | Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_fullStr | Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_short | Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection |
title_sort | relative effectiveness of covid-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against sars-cov-2 b.1.1.529 (omicron) among an australian population with low prior rates of sars-cov-2 infection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9489983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36180375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liubette relativeeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinationwith3comparedto2dosesagainstsarscov2b11529omicronamonganaustralianpopulationwithlowpriorratesofsarscov2infection AT giddingheather relativeeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinationwith3comparedto2dosesagainstsarscov2b11529omicronamonganaustralianpopulationwithlowpriorratesofsarscov2infection AT stepiensandrine relativeeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinationwith3comparedto2dosesagainstsarscov2b11529omicronamonganaustralianpopulationwithlowpriorratesofsarscov2infection AT cretikosmichelle relativeeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinationwith3comparedto2dosesagainstsarscov2b11529omicronamonganaustralianpopulationwithlowpriorratesofsarscov2infection AT macartneykristine relativeeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinationwith3comparedto2dosesagainstsarscov2b11529omicronamonganaustralianpopulationwithlowpriorratesofsarscov2infection |