Cargando…

Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine the effect of mouthwashes on the shear bond strength (SBS) and surface roughness (SR) of soft liners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, a total of 72 samples were prepared to evaluate the SBS (n = 36 for each liner). An autopolymerized (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemi, Shima, Babaloo, Amir Reza, Taghizadeh, Mahsa, Kananizadeh, Yousef, Sheikholeslami, Mehrnaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159055
_version_ 1784793045066055680
author Ghasemi, Shima
Babaloo, Amir Reza
Taghizadeh, Mahsa
Kananizadeh, Yousef
Sheikholeslami, Mehrnaz
author_facet Ghasemi, Shima
Babaloo, Amir Reza
Taghizadeh, Mahsa
Kananizadeh, Yousef
Sheikholeslami, Mehrnaz
author_sort Ghasemi, Shima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine the effect of mouthwashes on the shear bond strength (SBS) and surface roughness (SR) of soft liners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, a total of 72 samples were prepared to evaluate the SBS (n = 36 for each liner). An autopolymerized (Mollosil Plus) and a heat-polymerized liner (Molloplast B) were injected in between two blocks of heat-processed acrylic resin (Triplex). The samples in each liner group were subdivided into three subgroups. Control group samples were totally stored in distilled water. In test groups, samples were immersed in chlorhexidine (CHX) or mouthwash containing ginger extract for 30 min daily. After 20 days, the SBSs were evaluated using a universal testing machine. To evaluate the SR, 30 disk-shaped samples (15mm*10mm) were prepared for each type of liners and stored in the similar solutions; distilled water, CHX and ginger mouthwash (n=10). SR was measured at 1 day and after 90 days with a profilometer. One-way ANOVA, independent t-test, and paired t-test were used to analyze data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The SBS in Molloplast B liner was significantly higher than Mollosil regardless of type of solution (P < 0.001). In both liners, the mean SBS was not statistically different between the three groups of solutions. Changes in SR were not statistically significant after 90 days, except for the Mollosil group, immersed in ginger extract solution which was increased (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SBS of either group of liners did not change in both mouthwashes; However, SBS of heat-polymerized liner was higher than autopolymerized in all groups. Ginger extract-containing mouthwash increased SR of autopolymerized liner used in this study; whereas, there were no significant changes in the heat-cured liner. According to this study, CHX can be used for the disinfection of prosthesis lined with either type of liners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94902452022-09-22 Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners Ghasemi, Shima Babaloo, Amir Reza Taghizadeh, Mahsa Kananizadeh, Yousef Sheikholeslami, Mehrnaz Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to determine the effect of mouthwashes on the shear bond strength (SBS) and surface roughness (SR) of soft liners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, a total of 72 samples were prepared to evaluate the SBS (n = 36 for each liner). An autopolymerized (Mollosil Plus) and a heat-polymerized liner (Molloplast B) were injected in between two blocks of heat-processed acrylic resin (Triplex). The samples in each liner group were subdivided into three subgroups. Control group samples were totally stored in distilled water. In test groups, samples were immersed in chlorhexidine (CHX) or mouthwash containing ginger extract for 30 min daily. After 20 days, the SBSs were evaluated using a universal testing machine. To evaluate the SR, 30 disk-shaped samples (15mm*10mm) were prepared for each type of liners and stored in the similar solutions; distilled water, CHX and ginger mouthwash (n=10). SR was measured at 1 day and after 90 days with a profilometer. One-way ANOVA, independent t-test, and paired t-test were used to analyze data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The SBS in Molloplast B liner was significantly higher than Mollosil regardless of type of solution (P < 0.001). In both liners, the mean SBS was not statistically different between the three groups of solutions. Changes in SR were not statistically significant after 90 days, except for the Mollosil group, immersed in ginger extract solution which was increased (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SBS of either group of liners did not change in both mouthwashes; However, SBS of heat-polymerized liner was higher than autopolymerized in all groups. Ginger extract-containing mouthwash increased SR of autopolymerized liner used in this study; whereas, there were no significant changes in the heat-cured liner. According to this study, CHX can be used for the disinfection of prosthesis lined with either type of liners. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9490245/ /pubmed/36159055 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghasemi, Shima
Babaloo, Amir Reza
Taghizadeh, Mahsa
Kananizadeh, Yousef
Sheikholeslami, Mehrnaz
Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title_full Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title_fullStr Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title_short Effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
title_sort effect of different mouthwashes on the shear bond strength and surface roughness of intraoral and heat-cured soft liners
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159055
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemishima effectofdifferentmouthwashesontheshearbondstrengthandsurfaceroughnessofintraoralandheatcuredsoftliners
AT babalooamirreza effectofdifferentmouthwashesontheshearbondstrengthandsurfaceroughnessofintraoralandheatcuredsoftliners
AT taghizadehmahsa effectofdifferentmouthwashesontheshearbondstrengthandsurfaceroughnessofintraoralandheatcuredsoftliners
AT kananizadehyousef effectofdifferentmouthwashesontheshearbondstrengthandsurfaceroughnessofintraoralandheatcuredsoftliners
AT sheikholeslamimehrnaz effectofdifferentmouthwashesontheshearbondstrengthandsurfaceroughnessofintraoralandheatcuredsoftliners