Cargando…
A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159046 |
_version_ | 1784793046264578048 |
---|---|
author | Abbasi, Samaneh Nikanjam, Saeed Shishehian, Arash Khazaei, Sara Fotovat, Farnoush Pana, Nilofar Heydar |
author_facet | Abbasi, Samaneh Nikanjam, Saeed Shishehian, Arash Khazaei, Sara Fotovat, Farnoush Pana, Nilofar Heydar |
author_sort | Abbasi, Samaneh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth before and after removing the glaze layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study compared three types of artificial acrylic teeth, namely, Finex (F), SR Orthotyp DCL (S), and Vita Physiodents (V) in six groups (n = 10). Half of the artificial teeth of each brand underwent 0.5-mm buccal reduction to remove the glaze layer (groups FC, SC, and VC). The teeth were thermocycled and placed in a chewing simulator. The teeth with and without the glaze layer were weighed before and after the wear test. The data were analyzed using ANCOVA (the level of significance was 0.05). RESULTS: The weight reduction (indicative of wear) was 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.03 mg in Groups S and SC, 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.25 ± 0.04 mg in Groups V and VC, and 0.11 ± 0.15 and 0.28 ± 0.1 mg in groups F and FC, respectively. Removing the glaze layer (P < 0.01), type and brand of acrylic tooth (P < 0.01), and the baseline weight of artificial teeth (P < 0.01) had significant effects on wear resistance of artificial teeth. CONCLUSION: The wear of artificial teeth was greater after removing the glaze layer, and the magnitude of wear was also significantly different among the three brands. The group FC showed maximum wear while the groups S and V showed minimum wear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9490251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94902512022-09-22 A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer Abbasi, Samaneh Nikanjam, Saeed Shishehian, Arash Khazaei, Sara Fotovat, Farnoush Pana, Nilofar Heydar Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth before and after removing the glaze layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study compared three types of artificial acrylic teeth, namely, Finex (F), SR Orthotyp DCL (S), and Vita Physiodents (V) in six groups (n = 10). Half of the artificial teeth of each brand underwent 0.5-mm buccal reduction to remove the glaze layer (groups FC, SC, and VC). The teeth were thermocycled and placed in a chewing simulator. The teeth with and without the glaze layer were weighed before and after the wear test. The data were analyzed using ANCOVA (the level of significance was 0.05). RESULTS: The weight reduction (indicative of wear) was 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.03 mg in Groups S and SC, 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.25 ± 0.04 mg in Groups V and VC, and 0.11 ± 0.15 and 0.28 ± 0.1 mg in groups F and FC, respectively. Removing the glaze layer (P < 0.01), type and brand of acrylic tooth (P < 0.01), and the baseline weight of artificial teeth (P < 0.01) had significant effects on wear resistance of artificial teeth. CONCLUSION: The wear of artificial teeth was greater after removing the glaze layer, and the magnitude of wear was also significantly different among the three brands. The group FC showed maximum wear while the groups S and V showed minimum wear. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9490251/ /pubmed/36159046 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abbasi, Samaneh Nikanjam, Saeed Shishehian, Arash Khazaei, Sara Fotovat, Farnoush Pana, Nilofar Heydar A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title | A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title_full | A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title_short | A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abbasisamaneh acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT nikanjamsaeed acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT shishehianarash acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT khazaeisara acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT fotovatfarnoush acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT pananilofarheydar acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT abbasisamaneh comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT nikanjamsaeed comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT shishehianarash comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT khazaeisara comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT fotovatfarnoush comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer AT pananilofarheydar comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer |