Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer

BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbasi, Samaneh, Nikanjam, Saeed, Shishehian, Arash, Khazaei, Sara, Fotovat, Farnoush, Pana, Nilofar Heydar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159046
_version_ 1784793046264578048
author Abbasi, Samaneh
Nikanjam, Saeed
Shishehian, Arash
Khazaei, Sara
Fotovat, Farnoush
Pana, Nilofar Heydar
author_facet Abbasi, Samaneh
Nikanjam, Saeed
Shishehian, Arash
Khazaei, Sara
Fotovat, Farnoush
Pana, Nilofar Heydar
author_sort Abbasi, Samaneh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth before and after removing the glaze layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study compared three types of artificial acrylic teeth, namely, Finex (F), SR Orthotyp DCL (S), and Vita Physiodents (V) in six groups (n = 10). Half of the artificial teeth of each brand underwent 0.5-mm buccal reduction to remove the glaze layer (groups FC, SC, and VC). The teeth were thermocycled and placed in a chewing simulator. The teeth with and without the glaze layer were weighed before and after the wear test. The data were analyzed using ANCOVA (the level of significance was 0.05). RESULTS: The weight reduction (indicative of wear) was 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.03 mg in Groups S and SC, 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.25 ± 0.04 mg in Groups V and VC, and 0.11 ± 0.15 and 0.28 ± 0.1 mg in groups F and FC, respectively. Removing the glaze layer (P < 0.01), type and brand of acrylic tooth (P < 0.01), and the baseline weight of artificial teeth (P < 0.01) had significant effects on wear resistance of artificial teeth. CONCLUSION: The wear of artificial teeth was greater after removing the glaze layer, and the magnitude of wear was also significantly different among the three brands. The group FC showed maximum wear while the groups S and V showed minimum wear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94902512022-09-22 A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer Abbasi, Samaneh Nikanjam, Saeed Shishehian, Arash Khazaei, Sara Fotovat, Farnoush Pana, Nilofar Heydar Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The posterior denture teeth wear faster than the anterior teeth, which can result in occlusal interferences, loss of vertical dimension of occlusion, greater stress accumulation in the anterior region, and higher ridge resorption. This study aimed to compare the wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth before and after removing the glaze layer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study compared three types of artificial acrylic teeth, namely, Finex (F), SR Orthotyp DCL (S), and Vita Physiodents (V) in six groups (n = 10). Half of the artificial teeth of each brand underwent 0.5-mm buccal reduction to remove the glaze layer (groups FC, SC, and VC). The teeth were thermocycled and placed in a chewing simulator. The teeth with and without the glaze layer were weighed before and after the wear test. The data were analyzed using ANCOVA (the level of significance was 0.05). RESULTS: The weight reduction (indicative of wear) was 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.12 ± 0.03 mg in Groups S and SC, 0.03 ± 0.02 and 0.25 ± 0.04 mg in Groups V and VC, and 0.11 ± 0.15 and 0.28 ± 0.1 mg in groups F and FC, respectively. Removing the glaze layer (P < 0.01), type and brand of acrylic tooth (P < 0.01), and the baseline weight of artificial teeth (P < 0.01) had significant effects on wear resistance of artificial teeth. CONCLUSION: The wear of artificial teeth was greater after removing the glaze layer, and the magnitude of wear was also significantly different among the three brands. The group FC showed maximum wear while the groups S and V showed minimum wear. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9490251/ /pubmed/36159046 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abbasi, Samaneh
Nikanjam, Saeed
Shishehian, Arash
Khazaei, Sara
Fotovat, Farnoush
Pana, Nilofar Heydar
A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title_full A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title_short A comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
title_sort comparative evaluation of wear resistance of three types of artificial acrylic teeth after removing the glaze layer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159046
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasisamaneh acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT nikanjamsaeed acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT shishehianarash acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT khazaeisara acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT fotovatfarnoush acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT pananilofarheydar acomparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT abbasisamaneh comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT nikanjamsaeed comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT shishehianarash comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT khazaeisara comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT fotovatfarnoush comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer
AT pananilofarheydar comparativeevaluationofwearresistanceofthreetypesofartificialacrylicteethafterremovingtheglazelayer