Cargando…

The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping

Continuous cropping can lead to increased soil-borne diseases of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), resulting in a reduction in its yield quality. However, our understanding of the influence of continuous cropping on sugar beet-associated microbial community is limited and their interactions remain uncl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Rufei, Geng, Gui, Wang, Gang, Stevanato, Piergiorgio, Dong, Yinzhuang, Li, Tai, Yu, Lihua, Wang, Yuguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.956785
_version_ 1784793094266290176
author Cui, Rufei
Geng, Gui
Wang, Gang
Stevanato, Piergiorgio
Dong, Yinzhuang
Li, Tai
Yu, Lihua
Wang, Yuguang
author_facet Cui, Rufei
Geng, Gui
Wang, Gang
Stevanato, Piergiorgio
Dong, Yinzhuang
Li, Tai
Yu, Lihua
Wang, Yuguang
author_sort Cui, Rufei
collection PubMed
description Continuous cropping can lead to increased soil-borne diseases of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), resulting in a reduction in its yield quality. However, our understanding of the influence of continuous cropping on sugar beet-associated microbial community is limited and their interactions remain unclear. Here, we described and analyzed microbial diversity (N = 30) from three sugar beet belowground compartments (bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and beetroot) using 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. The continuous cropping showed lower bacterial alpha diversity in three belowground compartments and higher fungal alpha diversity in roots compared to the non-continuous cropping. There were significant differences in fungal community composition between the two groups. Compared with non-continuous cropping, continuous cropping increased the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic fungi such as Tausonia, Gilbellulopsis, and Fusarium, but decreased the relative abundance of Olpidium. The fungal flora in the three compartments displayed different keystone taxa. Fungi were more closely related to environmental factors than bacteria. Overall, changes in microbial diversity and composition under continuous cropping were more pronounced in the fungal communities, and the results of the study could guide development strategies to mitigate continuous crop adversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94904792022-09-22 The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping Cui, Rufei Geng, Gui Wang, Gang Stevanato, Piergiorgio Dong, Yinzhuang Li, Tai Yu, Lihua Wang, Yuguang Front Microbiol Microbiology Continuous cropping can lead to increased soil-borne diseases of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), resulting in a reduction in its yield quality. However, our understanding of the influence of continuous cropping on sugar beet-associated microbial community is limited and their interactions remain unclear. Here, we described and analyzed microbial diversity (N = 30) from three sugar beet belowground compartments (bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and beetroot) using 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. The continuous cropping showed lower bacterial alpha diversity in three belowground compartments and higher fungal alpha diversity in roots compared to the non-continuous cropping. There were significant differences in fungal community composition between the two groups. Compared with non-continuous cropping, continuous cropping increased the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic fungi such as Tausonia, Gilbellulopsis, and Fusarium, but decreased the relative abundance of Olpidium. The fungal flora in the three compartments displayed different keystone taxa. Fungi were more closely related to environmental factors than bacteria. Overall, changes in microbial diversity and composition under continuous cropping were more pronounced in the fungal communities, and the results of the study could guide development strategies to mitigate continuous crop adversity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9490479/ /pubmed/36160206 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.956785 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cui, Geng, Wang, Stevanato, Dong, Li, Yu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Cui, Rufei
Geng, Gui
Wang, Gang
Stevanato, Piergiorgio
Dong, Yinzhuang
Li, Tai
Yu, Lihua
Wang, Yuguang
The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title_full The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title_fullStr The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title_full_unstemmed The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title_short The response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
title_sort response of sugar beet rhizosphere micro-ecological environment to continuous cropping
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160206
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.956785
work_keys_str_mv AT cuirufei theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT genggui theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT wanggang theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT stevanatopiergiorgio theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT dongyinzhuang theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT litai theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT yulihua theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT wangyuguang theresponseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT cuirufei responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT genggui responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT wanggang responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT stevanatopiergiorgio responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT dongyinzhuang responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT litai responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT yulihua responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping
AT wangyuguang responseofsugarbeetrhizospheremicroecologicalenvironmenttocontinuouscropping