Cargando…

Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

IMPORTANCE: A textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measure that incorporates multiple perioperative events to reflect the most desirable outcome. The use of TO increases the event rate, captures more outcomes to reflect patient experience, and can be used as a benchmark for quality improveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucocq, James, Scollay, John, Patil, Pradeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171
_version_ 1784793097997123584
author Lucocq, James
Scollay, John
Patil, Pradeep
author_facet Lucocq, James
Scollay, John
Patil, Pradeep
author_sort Lucocq, James
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: A textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measure that incorporates multiple perioperative events to reflect the most desirable outcome. The use of TO increases the event rate, captures more outcomes to reflect patient experience, and can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement. OBJECTIVES: To introduce the concept of TO to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), propose the TO criteria, and identify characteristics associated with TO failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at 3 surgical units in a single health board in the United Kingdom. Participants included all patients undergoing elective LC between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The TO criteria were defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature for other surgical procedures. A TO was defined as an unremarkable elective LC without conversion to open cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, intraoperative complication, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), postoperative imaging, postoperative intervention, prolonged length of stay (>2 days), readmission within 100 days, or mortality. The rate of TOs was reported. Reasons for TO failure were reported, and preoperative characteristics were compared between TO and TO failure groups using both univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 2166 patients underwent elective LC (median age, 54 [range, 13-92] years; 1579 [72.9%] female). One thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients (85.5%) achieved a TO with an unremarkable perioperative course. Reasons for TO failure (315 patients [14.5%]) included conversion to open procedure (25 [7.9%]), subtotal cholecystectomy (59 [18.7%]), intraoperative complications (40 [12.7%]), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2; 92 [29.2%]), postoperative imaging (182 [57.8%]), postoperative intervention (57 [18.1%]), prolonged length of stay (>2 days; 142 [45.1%]), readmission (130 [41.3%]), and mortality (1 [0.3%]). Variables associated with TO failure included increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score (odds ratio [OR], 2.55 [95 CI, 1.69-3.85]; P < .001), increasing number of prior biliary-related admissions (OR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.36-5.27]; P = .004), acute cholecystitis (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.85]; P = .01), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.46-2.92]; P < .001), and preoperative cholecystostomy (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.54-6.76]; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to elective LC provides a benchmark to identify suboptimal patterns of care and enables institutions to identify strategies for quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94904962022-10-05 Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Lucocq, James Scollay, John Patil, Pradeep JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: A textbook outcome (TO) is a composite quality measure that incorporates multiple perioperative events to reflect the most desirable outcome. The use of TO increases the event rate, captures more outcomes to reflect patient experience, and can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement. OBJECTIVES: To introduce the concept of TO to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), propose the TO criteria, and identify characteristics associated with TO failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at 3 surgical units in a single health board in the United Kingdom. Participants included all patients undergoing elective LC between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The TO criteria were defined based on review of existing TO metrics in the literature for other surgical procedures. A TO was defined as an unremarkable elective LC without conversion to open cholecystectomy, subtotal cholecystectomy, intraoperative complication, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), postoperative imaging, postoperative intervention, prolonged length of stay (>2 days), readmission within 100 days, or mortality. The rate of TOs was reported. Reasons for TO failure were reported, and preoperative characteristics were compared between TO and TO failure groups using both univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 2166 patients underwent elective LC (median age, 54 [range, 13-92] years; 1579 [72.9%] female). One thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients (85.5%) achieved a TO with an unremarkable perioperative course. Reasons for TO failure (315 patients [14.5%]) included conversion to open procedure (25 [7.9%]), subtotal cholecystectomy (59 [18.7%]), intraoperative complications (40 [12.7%]), postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2; 92 [29.2%]), postoperative imaging (182 [57.8%]), postoperative intervention (57 [18.1%]), prolonged length of stay (>2 days; 142 [45.1%]), readmission (130 [41.3%]), and mortality (1 [0.3%]). Variables associated with TO failure included increasing American Society of Anesthesiologists score (odds ratio [OR], 2.55 [95 CI, 1.69-3.85]; P < .001), increasing number of prior biliary-related admissions (OR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.36-5.27]; P = .004), acute cholecystitis (OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.85]; P = .01), preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.46-2.92]; P < .001), and preoperative cholecystostomy (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.54-6.76]; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that applying the concept of TO to elective LC provides a benchmark to identify suboptimal patterns of care and enables institutions to identify strategies for quality improvement. American Medical Association 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9490496/ /pubmed/36125810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171 Text en Copyright 2022 Lucocq J et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Lucocq, James
Scollay, John
Patil, Pradeep
Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_short Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_sort evaluation of textbook outcome as a composite quality measure of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36125810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32171
work_keys_str_mv AT lucocqjames evaluationoftextbookoutcomeasacompositequalitymeasureofelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT scollayjohn evaluationoftextbookoutcomeasacompositequalitymeasureofelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT patilpradeep evaluationoftextbookoutcomeasacompositequalitymeasureofelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy