Cargando…

Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Digital innovations are yet to make real impacts in the care home sector despite the considerable potential of digital health approaches to help with continued staff shortages and to improve quality of care. To understand the current landscape of digital innovation in long-term care faci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapp, Linda, Egan, Kieren, McCann, Lisa, Mackenzie, Moira, Wales, Ann, Maguire, Roma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066928
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39681
_version_ 1784793102207156224
author Lapp, Linda
Egan, Kieren
McCann, Lisa
Mackenzie, Moira
Wales, Ann
Maguire, Roma
author_facet Lapp, Linda
Egan, Kieren
McCann, Lisa
Mackenzie, Moira
Wales, Ann
Maguire, Roma
author_sort Lapp, Linda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital innovations are yet to make real impacts in the care home sector despite the considerable potential of digital health approaches to help with continued staff shortages and to improve quality of care. To understand the current landscape of digital innovation in long-term care facilities such as nursing and care homes, it is important to find out which clinical decision support tools are currently used in long-term care facilities, what their purpose is, how they were developed, and what types of data they use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to analyze studies that evaluated clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities based on the purpose and intended users of the tools, the evidence base used to develop the tools, how the tools are used and their effectiveness, and the types of data the tools use to contribute to the existing scientific evidence to inform a roadmap for digital innovation, specifically for clinical decision support tools, in long-term care facilities. METHODS: A review of the literature published between January 1, 2010, and July 21, 2021, was conducted, using key search terms in 3 scientific journal databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the British Nursing Index. Only studies evaluating clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities were included in the review. RESULTS: In total, 17 papers were included in the final review. The clinical decision support tools described in these papers were evaluated for medication management, pressure ulcer prevention, dementia management, falls prevention, hospitalization, malnutrition prevention, urinary tract infection, and COVID-19 infection. In general, the included studies show that decision support tools can show improvements in delivery of care and in health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studies demonstrate the potential of positive impact of clinical decision support tools, there is variability in results, in part because of the diversity of types of decision support tools, users, and contexts as well as limited validation of the tools in use and in part because of the lack of clarity in defining the whole intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94905212022-09-22 Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review Lapp, Linda Egan, Kieren McCann, Lisa Mackenzie, Moira Wales, Ann Maguire, Roma J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Digital innovations are yet to make real impacts in the care home sector despite the considerable potential of digital health approaches to help with continued staff shortages and to improve quality of care. To understand the current landscape of digital innovation in long-term care facilities such as nursing and care homes, it is important to find out which clinical decision support tools are currently used in long-term care facilities, what their purpose is, how they were developed, and what types of data they use. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to analyze studies that evaluated clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities based on the purpose and intended users of the tools, the evidence base used to develop the tools, how the tools are used and their effectiveness, and the types of data the tools use to contribute to the existing scientific evidence to inform a roadmap for digital innovation, specifically for clinical decision support tools, in long-term care facilities. METHODS: A review of the literature published between January 1, 2010, and July 21, 2021, was conducted, using key search terms in 3 scientific journal databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the British Nursing Index. Only studies evaluating clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities were included in the review. RESULTS: In total, 17 papers were included in the final review. The clinical decision support tools described in these papers were evaluated for medication management, pressure ulcer prevention, dementia management, falls prevention, hospitalization, malnutrition prevention, urinary tract infection, and COVID-19 infection. In general, the included studies show that decision support tools can show improvements in delivery of care and in health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studies demonstrate the potential of positive impact of clinical decision support tools, there is variability in results, in part because of the diversity of types of decision support tools, users, and contexts as well as limited validation of the tools in use and in part because of the lack of clarity in defining the whole intervention. JMIR Publications 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9490521/ /pubmed/36066928 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39681 Text en ©Linda Lapp, Kieren Egan, Lisa McCann, Moira Mackenzie, Ann Wales, Roma Maguire. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Lapp, Linda
Egan, Kieren
McCann, Lisa
Mackenzie, Moira
Wales, Ann
Maguire, Roma
Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title_full Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title_short Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review
title_sort decision support tools in adult long-term care facilities: scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066928
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39681
work_keys_str_mv AT lapplinda decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview
AT egankieren decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview
AT mccannlisa decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview
AT mackenziemoira decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview
AT walesann decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview
AT maguireroma decisionsupporttoolsinadultlongtermcarefacilitiesscopingreview