Cargando…

Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey

OBJECTIVE: Patient and family engagement (PE) in health service planning and improvement is widely advocated, yet little prior research offered guidance on how to optimise PE, particularly in hospitals. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in generating evidence-informed consensus on recommendati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Natalie N, Baker, G Ross, Moody, Lesley, Scane, Kerseri, Urquhart, Robin, Wodchis, Walter P, Gagliardi, Anna R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271
_version_ 1784793113910312960
author Anderson, Natalie N
Baker, G Ross
Moody, Lesley
Scane, Kerseri
Urquhart, Robin
Wodchis, Walter P
Gagliardi, Anna R
author_facet Anderson, Natalie N
Baker, G Ross
Moody, Lesley
Scane, Kerseri
Urquhart, Robin
Wodchis, Walter P
Gagliardi, Anna R
author_sort Anderson, Natalie N
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patient and family engagement (PE) in health service planning and improvement is widely advocated, yet little prior research offered guidance on how to optimise PE, particularly in hospitals. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in generating evidence-informed consensus on recommendations to optimise PE. DESIGN: We transformed PE processes and resources from prior research into recommendations that populated an online Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Panellists included 58 persons with PE experience including: 22 patient/family advisors and 36 others (PE managers, clinicians, executives and researchers) in round 1 (100%) and 55 in round 2 (95%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of importance on a seven-point Likert scale of 48 strategies organised in domains: engagement approaches, strategies to integrate diverse perspectives, facilitators, strategies to champion engagement and hospital capacity for engagement. RESULTS: Of 50 recommendations, 80% or more of panellists prioritised 32 recommendations (27 in round 1, 5 in round 2) across 5 domains: 5 engagement approaches, 4 strategies to identify and integrate diverse patient/family advisor perspectives, 9 strategies to enable meaningful engagement, 9 strategies by which hospitals can champion PE and 5 elements of hospital capacity considered essential for supporting PE. There was high congruence in rating between patient/family advisors and healthcare professionals for all but six recommendations that were highly rated by patient/family advisors but not by others: capturing diverse perspectives, including a critical volume of advisors on committees/teams, prospectively monitoring PE, advocating for government funding of PE, including PE in healthcare worker job descriptions and sharing PE strategies across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-makers (eg, health system policy-makers, hospitals executives and managers) can use these recommendations as a framework by which to plan and operationalise PE, or evaluate and improve PE in their own settings. Ongoing research is needed to monitor the uptake and impact of these recommendations on PE policy and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94905722022-09-22 Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey Anderson, Natalie N Baker, G Ross Moody, Lesley Scane, Kerseri Urquhart, Robin Wodchis, Walter P Gagliardi, Anna R BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVE: Patient and family engagement (PE) in health service planning and improvement is widely advocated, yet little prior research offered guidance on how to optimise PE, particularly in hospitals. This study aimed to engage stakeholders in generating evidence-informed consensus on recommendations to optimise PE. DESIGN: We transformed PE processes and resources from prior research into recommendations that populated an online Delphi survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Panellists included 58 persons with PE experience including: 22 patient/family advisors and 36 others (PE managers, clinicians, executives and researchers) in round 1 (100%) and 55 in round 2 (95%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Ratings of importance on a seven-point Likert scale of 48 strategies organised in domains: engagement approaches, strategies to integrate diverse perspectives, facilitators, strategies to champion engagement and hospital capacity for engagement. RESULTS: Of 50 recommendations, 80% or more of panellists prioritised 32 recommendations (27 in round 1, 5 in round 2) across 5 domains: 5 engagement approaches, 4 strategies to identify and integrate diverse patient/family advisor perspectives, 9 strategies to enable meaningful engagement, 9 strategies by which hospitals can champion PE and 5 elements of hospital capacity considered essential for supporting PE. There was high congruence in rating between patient/family advisors and healthcare professionals for all but six recommendations that were highly rated by patient/family advisors but not by others: capturing diverse perspectives, including a critical volume of advisors on committees/teams, prospectively monitoring PE, advocating for government funding of PE, including PE in healthcare worker job descriptions and sharing PE strategies across hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-makers (eg, health system policy-makers, hospitals executives and managers) can use these recommendations as a framework by which to plan and operationalise PE, or evaluate and improve PE in their own settings. Ongoing research is needed to monitor the uptake and impact of these recommendations on PE policy and practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9490572/ /pubmed/36127114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Anderson, Natalie N
Baker, G Ross
Moody, Lesley
Scane, Kerseri
Urquhart, Robin
Wodchis, Walter P
Gagliardi, Anna R
Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title_full Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title_fullStr Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title_short Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey
title_sort consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a delphi survey
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonnatalien consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT bakergross consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT moodylesley consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT scanekerseri consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT urquhartrobin consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT wodchiswalterp consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey
AT gagliardiannar consensusonhowtooptimisepatientfamilyengagementinhospitalplanningandimprovementadelphisurvey