Cargando…
External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria
OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 21 days, 1-year mortality can be estimated using the ProVent score, calculated from four variables (age, platelet count, vasopressor use and renal replacement therapy). We aimed to externally validate discrimination...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066197 |
_version_ | 1784793114662141952 |
---|---|
author | Dibiasi, Christoph Kimberger, Oliver Bologheanu, Razvan Staudinger, Thomas Heinz, Gottfried Zauner, Christian Sengölge, Gürkan Schaden, Eva |
author_facet | Dibiasi, Christoph Kimberger, Oliver Bologheanu, Razvan Staudinger, Thomas Heinz, Gottfried Zauner, Christian Sengölge, Gürkan Schaden, Eva |
author_sort | Dibiasi, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 21 days, 1-year mortality can be estimated using the ProVent score, calculated from four variables (age, platelet count, vasopressor use and renal replacement therapy). We aimed to externally validate discrimination and calibration of the ProVent score and, if necessary, to update its underlying regression model. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, single-centre study. SETTING: 11 intensive care units at one tertiary academic hospital. PATIENTS: 780 critically ill adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 21 days. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 1-year mortality after intensive care unit discharge. RESULTS: 380 patients (49%) had died after 1 year. One-year mortality for ProVent scores from 0 to 5 were: 15%, 27%, 57%, 66%, 72% and 76%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ProVent probability model was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.79), calibration intercept was −0.43 (95% CI −0.59 to −0.27) and calibration slope was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.89). Model recalibration and extension by inclusion of three additional predictors (total bilirubin concentration, enteral nutrition and surgical status) improved model discrimination and calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the original ProVent model had negative net benefit, which was avoided with the extended ProVent model. CONCLUSIONS: The ProVent probability model had adequate discrimination but was miscalibrated in our patient cohort and, as such, could potentially be harmful. Use of the extended ProVent score developed by us could possibly alleviate this concern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9490575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94905752022-09-22 External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria Dibiasi, Christoph Kimberger, Oliver Bologheanu, Razvan Staudinger, Thomas Heinz, Gottfried Zauner, Christian Sengölge, Gürkan Schaden, Eva BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 21 days, 1-year mortality can be estimated using the ProVent score, calculated from four variables (age, platelet count, vasopressor use and renal replacement therapy). We aimed to externally validate discrimination and calibration of the ProVent score and, if necessary, to update its underlying regression model. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, single-centre study. SETTING: 11 intensive care units at one tertiary academic hospital. PATIENTS: 780 critically ill adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 21 days. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: 1-year mortality after intensive care unit discharge. RESULTS: 380 patients (49%) had died after 1 year. One-year mortality for ProVent scores from 0 to 5 were: 15%, 27%, 57%, 66%, 72% and 76%. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ProVent probability model was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.79), calibration intercept was −0.43 (95% CI −0.59 to −0.27) and calibration slope was 0.76 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.89). Model recalibration and extension by inclusion of three additional predictors (total bilirubin concentration, enteral nutrition and surgical status) improved model discrimination and calibration. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the original ProVent model had negative net benefit, which was avoided with the extended ProVent model. CONCLUSIONS: The ProVent probability model had adequate discrimination but was miscalibrated in our patient cohort and, as such, could potentially be harmful. Use of the extended ProVent score developed by us could possibly alleviate this concern. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9490575/ /pubmed/36127078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066197 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Dibiasi, Christoph Kimberger, Oliver Bologheanu, Razvan Staudinger, Thomas Heinz, Gottfried Zauner, Christian Sengölge, Gürkan Schaden, Eva External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title | External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title_full | External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title_fullStr | External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title_short | External validation of the ProVent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in Austria |
title_sort | external validation of the provent score for prognostication of 1-year mortality of critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a single-centre, retrospective observational study in austria |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dibiasichristoph externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT kimbergeroliver externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT bologheanurazvan externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT staudingerthomas externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT heinzgottfried externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT zaunerchristian externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT sengolgegurkan externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria AT schadeneva externalvalidationoftheproventscoreforprognosticationof1yearmortalityofcriticallyillpatientswithprolongedmechanicalventilationasinglecentreretrospectiveobservationalstudyinaustria |