Cargando…

Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study

INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coors, Marie, Flemming, Ronja, Schüttig, Wiebke, Hubert, Gordian Jan, Hubert, Nikolai Dominik, Sundmacher, Leonie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533
_version_ 1784793115153924096
author Coors, Marie
Flemming, Ronja
Schüttig, Wiebke
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Hubert, Nikolai Dominik
Sundmacher, Leonie
author_facet Coors, Marie
Flemming, Ronja
Schüttig, Wiebke
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Hubert, Nikolai Dominik
Sundmacher, Leonie
author_sort Coors, Marie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of Southeast Bavaria by flying a team of interventionalists via helicopter directly to patients in the regional TEMPiS hospitals instead of transporting the patients to the next comprehensive stroke centre. The objective of the present paper is to describe the methods for the economic evaluation (TEMPiS-Gesundheitsökonomische Analyse (TEMPiS-GÖA)) alongside the TEMPiS-FIT study to determine whether the new form of care is cost-effective compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost–utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a statutory health insurance perspective as well as from a societal perspective over the time horizon of 12 months after the patients’ hospital discharge. Direct costs from outpatient and inpatient care are collected from routine data of the participating health insurance funds, while medical and non-medical costs from a patient’s perspective are retrieved from primary data collected during the TEMPiS-FIT study and follow-up questionnaires. Results will be presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio quantifying the incremental costs and health benefits compared with standard care practice. The outcome of the CEA will be measured in costs per minute reduction in mean process time to thrombectomy. The outcome of the CUA will be presented as costs per quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the TEMPiS-FIT study was granted by the Bavarian State Medical Association Ethics Committee (# 17056). Results will be disseminated via reports, presentations of the results in publications and at conferences and on the TEMPiS website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023885. Registered on 2 July 2021 – retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94905772022-09-22 Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study Coors, Marie Flemming, Ronja Schüttig, Wiebke Hubert, Gordian Jan Hubert, Nikolai Dominik Sundmacher, Leonie BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of Southeast Bavaria by flying a team of interventionalists via helicopter directly to patients in the regional TEMPiS hospitals instead of transporting the patients to the next comprehensive stroke centre. The objective of the present paper is to describe the methods for the economic evaluation (TEMPiS-Gesundheitsökonomische Analyse (TEMPiS-GÖA)) alongside the TEMPiS-FIT study to determine whether the new form of care is cost-effective compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost–utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a statutory health insurance perspective as well as from a societal perspective over the time horizon of 12 months after the patients’ hospital discharge. Direct costs from outpatient and inpatient care are collected from routine data of the participating health insurance funds, while medical and non-medical costs from a patient’s perspective are retrieved from primary data collected during the TEMPiS-FIT study and follow-up questionnaires. Results will be presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio quantifying the incremental costs and health benefits compared with standard care practice. The outcome of the CEA will be measured in costs per minute reduction in mean process time to thrombectomy. The outcome of the CUA will be presented as costs per quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the TEMPiS-FIT study was granted by the Bavarian State Medical Association Ethics Committee (# 17056). Results will be disseminated via reports, presentations of the results in publications and at conferences and on the TEMPiS website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023885. Registered on 2 July 2021 – retrospectively registered. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9490577/ /pubmed/36127094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Coors, Marie
Flemming, Ronja
Schüttig, Wiebke
Hubert, Gordian Jan
Hubert, Nikolai Dominik
Sundmacher, Leonie
Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title_full Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title_fullStr Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title_full_unstemmed Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title_short Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
title_sort health economic evaluation of the ‘flying intervention team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the tempis-göa study
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533
work_keys_str_mv AT coorsmarie healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy
AT flemmingronja healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy
AT schuttigwiebke healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy
AT hubertgordianjan healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy
AT hubertnikolaidominik healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy
AT sundmacherleonie healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy