Cargando…
Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study
INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533 |
_version_ | 1784793115153924096 |
---|---|
author | Coors, Marie Flemming, Ronja Schüttig, Wiebke Hubert, Gordian Jan Hubert, Nikolai Dominik Sundmacher, Leonie |
author_facet | Coors, Marie Flemming, Ronja Schüttig, Wiebke Hubert, Gordian Jan Hubert, Nikolai Dominik Sundmacher, Leonie |
author_sort | Coors, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of Southeast Bavaria by flying a team of interventionalists via helicopter directly to patients in the regional TEMPiS hospitals instead of transporting the patients to the next comprehensive stroke centre. The objective of the present paper is to describe the methods for the economic evaluation (TEMPiS-Gesundheitsökonomische Analyse (TEMPiS-GÖA)) alongside the TEMPiS-FIT study to determine whether the new form of care is cost-effective compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost–utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a statutory health insurance perspective as well as from a societal perspective over the time horizon of 12 months after the patients’ hospital discharge. Direct costs from outpatient and inpatient care are collected from routine data of the participating health insurance funds, while medical and non-medical costs from a patient’s perspective are retrieved from primary data collected during the TEMPiS-FIT study and follow-up questionnaires. Results will be presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio quantifying the incremental costs and health benefits compared with standard care practice. The outcome of the CEA will be measured in costs per minute reduction in mean process time to thrombectomy. The outcome of the CUA will be presented as costs per quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the TEMPiS-FIT study was granted by the Bavarian State Medical Association Ethics Committee (# 17056). Results will be disseminated via reports, presentations of the results in publications and at conferences and on the TEMPiS website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023885. Registered on 2 July 2021 – retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9490577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94905772022-09-22 Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study Coors, Marie Flemming, Ronja Schüttig, Wiebke Hubert, Gordian Jan Hubert, Nikolai Dominik Sundmacher, Leonie BMJ Open Health Economics INTRODUCTION: Providing comprehensive stroke care poses major organisational and financial challenges to the German healthcare system. The quasi-randomised TEMPiS–Flying Intervention Team (TEMPiS-FIT) study aims to close the gap in the treatment of patients who had ischaemic stroke in rural areas of Southeast Bavaria by flying a team of interventionalists via helicopter directly to patients in the regional TEMPiS hospitals instead of transporting the patients to the next comprehensive stroke centre. The objective of the present paper is to describe the methods for the economic evaluation (TEMPiS-Gesundheitsökonomische Analyse (TEMPiS-GÖA)) alongside the TEMPiS-FIT study to determine whether the new form of care is cost-effective compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and cost–utility analysis (CUA) will be performed from a statutory health insurance perspective as well as from a societal perspective over the time horizon of 12 months after the patients’ hospital discharge. Direct costs from outpatient and inpatient care are collected from routine data of the participating health insurance funds, while medical and non-medical costs from a patient’s perspective are retrieved from primary data collected during the TEMPiS-FIT study and follow-up questionnaires. Results will be presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio quantifying the incremental costs and health benefits compared with standard care practice. The outcome of the CEA will be measured in costs per minute reduction in mean process time to thrombectomy. The outcome of the CUA will be presented as costs per quality-adjusted life year gained. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the TEMPiS-FIT study was granted by the Bavarian State Medical Association Ethics Committee (# 17056). Results will be disseminated via reports, presentations of the results in publications and at conferences and on the TEMPiS website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00023885. Registered on 2 July 2021 – retrospectively registered. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9490577/ /pubmed/36127094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Coors, Marie Flemming, Ronja Schüttig, Wiebke Hubert, Gordian Jan Hubert, Nikolai Dominik Sundmacher, Leonie Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title | Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title_full | Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title_fullStr | Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title_full_unstemmed | Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title_short | Health economic evaluation of the ‘Flying Intervention Team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the TEMPiS-GÖA study |
title_sort | health economic evaluation of the ‘flying intervention team’ as a novel stroke care concept for rural areas: study protocol of the tempis-göa study |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36127094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coorsmarie healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy AT flemmingronja healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy AT schuttigwiebke healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy AT hubertgordianjan healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy AT hubertnikolaidominik healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy AT sundmacherleonie healtheconomicevaluationoftheflyinginterventionteamasanovelstrokecareconceptforruralareasstudyprotocolofthetempisgoastudy |