Cargando…

Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Various attachments like ball, bar-clip, magnetic attachments are used in implant supported overdentures. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) a newly innovated technology has been used in dental implantology to evaluate stress distribution patterns. There is little evidence available regarding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya, Saneja, Ritu, Singh, Ankita, Dubey, Pavan Kumar, Bhatnagar, Atul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.002
_version_ 1784793118146560000
author Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya
Saneja, Ritu
Singh, Ankita
Dubey, Pavan Kumar
Bhatnagar, Atul
author_facet Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya
Saneja, Ritu
Singh, Ankita
Dubey, Pavan Kumar
Bhatnagar, Atul
author_sort Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various attachments like ball, bar-clip, magnetic attachments are used in implant supported overdentures. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) a newly innovated technology has been used in dental implantology to evaluate stress distribution patterns. There is little evidence available regarding the stress distribution in peri-implant region for implant supported overdentures. The purpose of the review was to generate scientific evidence on peri-implant stress distribution in FEA model with different types of attachments employed in implant supported overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Guidelines and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was undertaken by two reviewers from January 2020 to June 2020 with no year limits to published articles. Only in-vitro FEA studies were included. Following electronic databases were searched for published studies- PubMed, Web of Science. Characteristics of the studies tabulated and analysis of articles was done to compare different attachment systems. RESULTS: Locator attachments showed better stress distribution than ball attachment system in all the studies but one. Two studies showed results in favour of ball attachment compared to bar-clip attachment system when stress was evaluated distal to the implants. No significant difference in terms of stress concentration could be generated between ball versus magnetic/equator versus locator attachment system due to less number of studies and conflicting results. CONCLUSION: Various studies showed different results due to heterogenicity in selected attachment systems and study designs. Locator attachments showed favourable stress distribution around peri-implant bone than other attachments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94905902022-09-22 Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya Saneja, Ritu Singh, Ankita Dubey, Pavan Kumar Bhatnagar, Atul J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Article BACKGROUND: Various attachments like ball, bar-clip, magnetic attachments are used in implant supported overdentures. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) a newly innovated technology has been used in dental implantology to evaluate stress distribution patterns. There is little evidence available regarding the stress distribution in peri-implant region for implant supported overdentures. The purpose of the review was to generate scientific evidence on peri-implant stress distribution in FEA model with different types of attachments employed in implant supported overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Guidelines and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was undertaken by two reviewers from January 2020 to June 2020 with no year limits to published articles. Only in-vitro FEA studies were included. Following electronic databases were searched for published studies- PubMed, Web of Science. Characteristics of the studies tabulated and analysis of articles was done to compare different attachment systems. RESULTS: Locator attachments showed better stress distribution than ball attachment system in all the studies but one. Two studies showed results in favour of ball attachment compared to bar-clip attachment system when stress was evaluated distal to the implants. No significant difference in terms of stress concentration could be generated between ball versus magnetic/equator versus locator attachment system due to less number of studies and conflicting results. CONCLUSION: Various studies showed different results due to heterogenicity in selected attachment systems and study designs. Locator attachments showed favourable stress distribution around peri-implant bone than other attachments. Elsevier 2022 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9490590/ /pubmed/36159066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.002 Text en © 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bhattacharjee, Bappaditya
Saneja, Ritu
Singh, Ankita
Dubey, Pavan Kumar
Bhatnagar, Atul
Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title_full Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title_fullStr Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title_short Peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – A systematic review
title_sort peri-implant stress distribution assessment of various attachment systems for implant supported overdenture prosthesis by finite element analysis – a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharjeebappaditya periimplantstressdistributionassessmentofvariousattachmentsystemsforimplantsupportedoverdentureprosthesisbyfiniteelementanalysisasystematicreview
AT sanejaritu periimplantstressdistributionassessmentofvariousattachmentsystemsforimplantsupportedoverdentureprosthesisbyfiniteelementanalysisasystematicreview
AT singhankita periimplantstressdistributionassessmentofvariousattachmentsystemsforimplantsupportedoverdentureprosthesisbyfiniteelementanalysisasystematicreview
AT dubeypavankumar periimplantstressdistributionassessmentofvariousattachmentsystemsforimplantsupportedoverdentureprosthesisbyfiniteelementanalysisasystematicreview
AT bhatnagaratul periimplantstressdistributionassessmentofvariousattachmentsystemsforimplantsupportedoverdentureprosthesisbyfiniteelementanalysisasystematicreview