Cargando…

Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile

BACKGROUND: A key aspect of any new material safety assessment is the evaluation of their in vivo genotoxicity. Graphene oxide (GO) has been studied for many promising applications, but there are remaining concerns about its safety profile, especially after inhalation. Herein we tested whether GO la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani, Loret, Thomas, Fordham, Alexander, Arshad, Atta, Drummond, Matthew, Dodd, Abbie, Lozano, Neus, Kostarelos, Kostas, Bussy, Cyrill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-022-00502-w
_version_ 1784793185813266432
author de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani
Loret, Thomas
Fordham, Alexander
Arshad, Atta
Drummond, Matthew
Dodd, Abbie
Lozano, Neus
Kostarelos, Kostas
Bussy, Cyrill
author_facet de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani
Loret, Thomas
Fordham, Alexander
Arshad, Atta
Drummond, Matthew
Dodd, Abbie
Lozano, Neus
Kostarelos, Kostas
Bussy, Cyrill
author_sort de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A key aspect of any new material safety assessment is the evaluation of their in vivo genotoxicity. Graphene oxide (GO) has been studied for many promising applications, but there are remaining concerns about its safety profile, especially after inhalation. Herein we tested whether GO lateral dimension, comparing micrometric (LGO) and nanometric (USGO) GO sheets, has a role in the formation of DNA double strand breaks in mouse lungs. We used spatial resolution and differential cell type analysis to measure DNA damages in both epithelial and immune cells, after either single or repeated exposure. RESULTS: GO induced DNA damages were size and dose dependent, in both exposure scenario. After single exposure to a high dose, both USGO and LGO induced significant DNA damage in the lung parenchyma, but only during the acute phase response (p < 0.05 for USGO; p < 0.01 for LGO). This was followed by a fast lung recovery at day 7 and 28 for both GOs. When evaluating the chronic impact of GO after repeated exposure, only a high dose of LGO induced long-term DNA damages in lung alveolar epithelia (at 84 days, p < 0.05). Regardless of size, low dose GO did not induce any significant DNA damage after repeated exposure. A multiparametric correlation analysis of our repeated exposure data revealed that transient or persistent inflammation and oxidative stress were associated to either recovery or persistent DNA damages. For USGO, recovery from DNA damage was correlated to efficient recovery from acute inflammation (i.e., significant secretion of SAA3, p < 0.001; infiltration of neutrophils, p < 0.01). In contrast, the persistence of LGO in lungs was associated to a long-lasting presence of multinucleated macrophages (up to 84 days, p < 0.05), an underlying inflammation (IL-1α secretion up to 28 days, p < 0.05) and the presence of persistent DNA damages at 84 days. CONCLUSIONS: Overall these results highlight the importance of the exposure scenario used. We showed that LGO was more genotoxic after repeated exposure than single exposure due to persistent lung inflammation. These findings are important in the context of human health risk assessment and toward establishing recommendations for a safe use of graphene based materials in the workplace. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12989-022-00502-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9490925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94909252022-09-22 Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani Loret, Thomas Fordham, Alexander Arshad, Atta Drummond, Matthew Dodd, Abbie Lozano, Neus Kostarelos, Kostas Bussy, Cyrill Part Fibre Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: A key aspect of any new material safety assessment is the evaluation of their in vivo genotoxicity. Graphene oxide (GO) has been studied for many promising applications, but there are remaining concerns about its safety profile, especially after inhalation. Herein we tested whether GO lateral dimension, comparing micrometric (LGO) and nanometric (USGO) GO sheets, has a role in the formation of DNA double strand breaks in mouse lungs. We used spatial resolution and differential cell type analysis to measure DNA damages in both epithelial and immune cells, after either single or repeated exposure. RESULTS: GO induced DNA damages were size and dose dependent, in both exposure scenario. After single exposure to a high dose, both USGO and LGO induced significant DNA damage in the lung parenchyma, but only during the acute phase response (p < 0.05 for USGO; p < 0.01 for LGO). This was followed by a fast lung recovery at day 7 and 28 for both GOs. When evaluating the chronic impact of GO after repeated exposure, only a high dose of LGO induced long-term DNA damages in lung alveolar epithelia (at 84 days, p < 0.05). Regardless of size, low dose GO did not induce any significant DNA damage after repeated exposure. A multiparametric correlation analysis of our repeated exposure data revealed that transient or persistent inflammation and oxidative stress were associated to either recovery or persistent DNA damages. For USGO, recovery from DNA damage was correlated to efficient recovery from acute inflammation (i.e., significant secretion of SAA3, p < 0.001; infiltration of neutrophils, p < 0.01). In contrast, the persistence of LGO in lungs was associated to a long-lasting presence of multinucleated macrophages (up to 84 days, p < 0.05), an underlying inflammation (IL-1α secretion up to 28 days, p < 0.05) and the presence of persistent DNA damages at 84 days. CONCLUSIONS: Overall these results highlight the importance of the exposure scenario used. We showed that LGO was more genotoxic after repeated exposure than single exposure due to persistent lung inflammation. These findings are important in the context of human health risk assessment and toward establishing recommendations for a safe use of graphene based materials in the workplace. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12989-022-00502-w. BioMed Central 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9490925/ /pubmed/36131347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-022-00502-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
de Luna, Luis Augusto Visani
Loret, Thomas
Fordham, Alexander
Arshad, Atta
Drummond, Matthew
Dodd, Abbie
Lozano, Neus
Kostarelos, Kostas
Bussy, Cyrill
Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title_full Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title_fullStr Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title_full_unstemmed Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title_short Lung recovery from DNA damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
title_sort lung recovery from dna damage induced by graphene oxide is dependent on size, dose and inflammation profile
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131347
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-022-00502-w
work_keys_str_mv AT delunaluisaugustovisani lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT loretthomas lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT fordhamalexander lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT arshadatta lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT drummondmatthew lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT doddabbie lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT lozanoneus lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT kostareloskostas lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile
AT bussycyrill lungrecoveryfromdnadamageinducedbygrapheneoxideisdependentonsizedoseandinflammationprofile