Cargando…

Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer

We performed this study to investigate pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy and clinicopathological factors associated with grade group (GG) upgrading in patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) GG 1 and 2 prostate cancer (PCa) in a Chinese cohort. We include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Li, Xing, Wang, Zhi-Xian, Zhu, Yun-Peng, Wang, Jing, Yin, Yi-Sheng, Zeng, Xiao-Yong
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35170453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja2021108

Ejemplares similares

Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
por: Takeshima, Yuta, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Basal total testosterone serum levels predict biopsy and pathological ISUP grade group in a large cohort of Caucasian prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy
por: Tafuri, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

IVIM Parameters on MRI Could Predict ISUP Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy
por: Chang, Chun-Bi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy
por: Nyk, Łukasz, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinicopathological Analysis of the ISUP Grade Group And Other Parameters in Prostate Cancer: Elucidation of Mutual Impact of the Various Parameters
por: Okubo, Yoichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
por: van Leenders, Geert J.L.H., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Active surveillance should not be routinely considered in ISUP grade group 2 prostate cancer
por: Gandaglia, Giorgio, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

WHO/ISUP classification, grading and pathological staging of renal cell carcinoma: standards and controversies
por: Warren, Anne Y., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?
por: Xu, Ning, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correlation between microvessel maturity and ISUP grades assessed using contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography in prostate cancer
por: Gao, Yong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Faraj, Sheila F., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

From Cognitive MR-Targeted Fusion Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictors of Gleason Grade Group Upgrading in a Chinese Cohort
por: Yan, Huaqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The ISUP system of staging, grading and classification of renal cell neoplasia
por: Samaratunga, Hemamali, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Radiologist-like artificial intelligence for grade group prediction of radical prostatectomy for reducing upgrading and downgrading from biopsy
por: Shao, Lizhi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens
por: Tomioka, Masayuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The validation of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center retrospective study
por: Liu, Jiandong, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predicting Insignificant Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance according to the Pre-International Society of Urological Pathology (Pre-ISUP) 2014 Era Versus the Post-ISUP2014 Era
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

PTEN Loss is Associated with Upgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy
por: Lotan, Tamara L., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

MRI-Fusion Targeted vs. Systematic Prostate Biopsy–How Does the Biopsy Technique Affect Gleason Grade Concordance and Upgrading After Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Rührup, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Carbonic anhydrase IX is a marker of hypoxia and correlates with higher Gleason scores and ISUP grading in prostate cancer
por: Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Grade Group accuracy is improved by extensive prostate biopsy sampling, but unrelated to prostatectomy specimen sampling or use of immunohistochemistry
por: Korpás, Kristóf Levente, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

WHO/ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma; validation of grading on the digital pathology platform and perspectives on reproducibility of grade
por: Browning, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Determination of Whether Apex or Non-Apex Prostate Cancer Is the Best Candidate for the Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Predict Pathological Grade Group Upgrading and Upstaging after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Huang, Cong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

(68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Initial Staging in Black and White South African Males with ISUP Grade Group 1 and 2 Prostate Adenocarcinoma
por: Maserumule, Letjie C., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Rijstenberg, L. Lucia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer
por: Morrison, Belinda F, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The prognostic value of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading of newly diagnosed prostate cancer from systematic biopsy to radical prostatectomy
por: Zheng, Anqi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Are Prostate Specific-Antigen (PSA) and age associated with the risk of ISUP Grade 1 prostate cancer? Results from 72 996 individual biopsy cores in 6 083 men from the Stockholm3 study
por: Palsdottir, Thorgerdur, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in prostate biopsy samples: correlation with aggressive pathological features after radical prostatectomy and prognostic value in high-risk prostate cancer
por: Zhu, Sha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predicting Gleason sum upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: a new nomogram and its internal validation
por: Wang, Xiaochuan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
por: Heo, Ji Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Circulating preoperative testosterone level predicts unfavourable disease at radical prostatectomy in men with International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1 prostate cancer diagnosed with systematic biopsies
por: Ferro, Matteo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform pattern in prostate tissues: Predictor for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate based on biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
por: Shiomi, Ei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi‐institutional analysis
por: Barsky, Andrew R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Quantitative Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values, ISUP Grades and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Values of Potentially Malignant PI-RADS Lesions
por: Spadarotto, Nadine, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
por: Novak, Vojtech, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ts43aovfgpl0uc4d2s0kd32cjh