Cargando…

Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Common anesthesia practice for hand surgery combines a preoperative regional anesthetic and intraoperative monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Despite adequate regional anesthesia, patients may receive doses of intraoperative sedatives which can result in oversedation and potentially avoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faruki, Adeel A., Nguyen, Thy B., Gasangwa, Doris-Vanessa, Levy, Nadav, Proeschel, Sam, Yu, Jessica, Ip, Victoria, McGourty, Marie, Korsunsky, Galina, Novack, Victor, Mueller, Ariel L., Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie, Rozental, Tamara D., O’Gara, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36129891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272030
_version_ 1784793312225394688
author Faruki, Adeel A.
Nguyen, Thy B.
Gasangwa, Doris-Vanessa
Levy, Nadav
Proeschel, Sam
Yu, Jessica
Ip, Victoria
McGourty, Marie
Korsunsky, Galina
Novack, Victor
Mueller, Ariel L.
Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie
Rozental, Tamara D.
O’Gara, Brian P.
author_facet Faruki, Adeel A.
Nguyen, Thy B.
Gasangwa, Doris-Vanessa
Levy, Nadav
Proeschel, Sam
Yu, Jessica
Ip, Victoria
McGourty, Marie
Korsunsky, Galina
Novack, Victor
Mueller, Ariel L.
Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie
Rozental, Tamara D.
O’Gara, Brian P.
author_sort Faruki, Adeel A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Common anesthesia practice for hand surgery combines a preoperative regional anesthetic and intraoperative monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Despite adequate regional anesthesia, patients may receive doses of intraoperative sedatives which can result in oversedation and potentially avoidable complications. VR could prove to be a valuable tool for patients and providers by distracting the mind from processing noxious stimuli resulting in minimized sedative use and reduced risk of oversedation without negatively impacting patient satisfaction. Our hypothesis was that intraoperative VR use reduces sedative dosing during elective hand surgery without detracting from patient satisfaction as compared to a usual care control. METHODS: Forty adults undergoing hand surgery were randomized to receive either intraoperative VR in addition to MAC, or usual MAC. Patients in both groups received preoperative regional anesthesia at provider discretion. Intraoperatively, the VR group viewed programming of their choice via a head-mounted display. The primary outcome was intraoperative propofol dose per hour (mg · hr(-1)). Secondary outcomes included patient reported pain and anxiety, overall satisfaction, functional outcome, and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of the 40 enrolled patients, 34 completed the perioperative portion of the trial. VR group patients received significantly less propofol per hour than the control group (Mean (±SD): 125.3 (±296.0) vs 750.6 (±334.6) mg · hr(-1), p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in patient reported overall satisfaction, (0–100 scale, Median (IQR) 92 (77–100) vs 100 (100–100), VR vs control, p = 0.087). There were no significant differences between groups in PACU pain scores, perioperative opioid analgesic dose, or in postoperative functional outcome. PACU LOS was significantly decreased in the VR group (53.0 (43.0–72.0) vs 75.0 (57.5–89.0) min, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: VR immersion during hand surgery led to significant reductions in intraoperative propofol dose and PACU LOS without negatively impacting key patient reported outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9491608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94916082022-09-22 Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial Faruki, Adeel A. Nguyen, Thy B. Gasangwa, Doris-Vanessa Levy, Nadav Proeschel, Sam Yu, Jessica Ip, Victoria McGourty, Marie Korsunsky, Galina Novack, Victor Mueller, Ariel L. Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie Rozental, Tamara D. O’Gara, Brian P. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Common anesthesia practice for hand surgery combines a preoperative regional anesthetic and intraoperative monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Despite adequate regional anesthesia, patients may receive doses of intraoperative sedatives which can result in oversedation and potentially avoidable complications. VR could prove to be a valuable tool for patients and providers by distracting the mind from processing noxious stimuli resulting in minimized sedative use and reduced risk of oversedation without negatively impacting patient satisfaction. Our hypothesis was that intraoperative VR use reduces sedative dosing during elective hand surgery without detracting from patient satisfaction as compared to a usual care control. METHODS: Forty adults undergoing hand surgery were randomized to receive either intraoperative VR in addition to MAC, or usual MAC. Patients in both groups received preoperative regional anesthesia at provider discretion. Intraoperatively, the VR group viewed programming of their choice via a head-mounted display. The primary outcome was intraoperative propofol dose per hour (mg · hr(-1)). Secondary outcomes included patient reported pain and anxiety, overall satisfaction, functional outcome, and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of the 40 enrolled patients, 34 completed the perioperative portion of the trial. VR group patients received significantly less propofol per hour than the control group (Mean (±SD): 125.3 (±296.0) vs 750.6 (±334.6) mg · hr(-1), p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in patient reported overall satisfaction, (0–100 scale, Median (IQR) 92 (77–100) vs 100 (100–100), VR vs control, p = 0.087). There were no significant differences between groups in PACU pain scores, perioperative opioid analgesic dose, or in postoperative functional outcome. PACU LOS was significantly decreased in the VR group (53.0 (43.0–72.0) vs 75.0 (57.5–89.0) min, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: VR immersion during hand surgery led to significant reductions in intraoperative propofol dose and PACU LOS without negatively impacting key patient reported outcomes. Public Library of Science 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9491608/ /pubmed/36129891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272030 Text en © 2022 Faruki et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Faruki, Adeel A.
Nguyen, Thy B.
Gasangwa, Doris-Vanessa
Levy, Nadav
Proeschel, Sam
Yu, Jessica
Ip, Victoria
McGourty, Marie
Korsunsky, Galina
Novack, Victor
Mueller, Ariel L.
Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie
Rozental, Tamara D.
O’Gara, Brian P.
Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort virtual reality immersion compared to monitored anesthesia care for hand surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36129891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272030
work_keys_str_mv AT farukiadeela virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nguyenthyb virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gasangwadorisvanessa virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT levynadav virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT proeschelsam virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yujessica virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ipvictoria virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgourtymarie virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT korsunskygalina virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT novackvictor virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muellerariell virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bannergoodspeedvalerie virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rozentaltamarad virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ogarabrianp virtualrealityimmersioncomparedtomonitoredanesthesiacareforhandsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial