Cargando…

Conséquences de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur le taux de péritonites de dialyse péritonéale : plaidoyer pour une formation continue ininterrompue

BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is a common complication of chronic peritoneal dialysis treatment contributing to both technique failure and/or death. Little is effectively known about the actual benefits of a continuous training program on peritonitis rates. In the present study, we measured the impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Lucas, Clevenbergh, Philippe, Collart, Frédéric, Brayer, Isabelle, Mesquita, Maria, Taghavi, Maxime, Fosso, Christelle, Kaysi, Saleh, Nortier, Joëlle, Dratwa, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9492510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2022.07.401
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is a common complication of chronic peritoneal dialysis treatment contributing to both technique failure and/or death. Little is effectively known about the actual benefits of a continuous training program on peritonitis rates. In the present study, we measured the impact of our patients’ training protocol on peritonitis rates. We further studied which consequences the COVID-related disruption of our follow-up program had on peritonitis rates. METHODS: We present our yearly peritonitis rates since our patients’ training and retraining program was implemented in 2010. We then focused our study on three consecutive years: 2019, 2020 (emergence of COVID-19), and 2021, collecting microbiological data from each peritonitis episode. Statistical analysis were used to corroborate our findings. RESULTS: Since 2010, peritonitis rates declined linearly (R2 = 0,6556; df = 8; P < 0.01) until its nadir in 2019 with 4 peritonitis episodes. The majority of infections were then treated in the outpatient Clinic. In 2020, our continuous technique evaluation decreased by 51% and 28 peritonitis episodes occurred, 47% secondary to strict cutaneous bacteria's, and 31% gastro-intestinal, irrespective of patients’ experience or peritoneal dialysis modality. The hospitalization rate reached 71%. Having restored our protocol, we decreased peritonitis rates by 50% in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for peritonitis are identifiable and modifiable and require sustained intervention, continuous visual monitoring and training. These interventions significantly reduce peritonitis rates. Any brief interruption to patients’ technique evaluation may elevate peritonitis rates significantly.