Cargando…

Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers

PURPOSE: Rural (vs urban) patients experience poorer cancer outcomes and are less likely to be engaged in cancer prevention, such as screening. As part of a community needs assessment, we explored rural cancer survivors’ and caregivers’ experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care serv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratnapradipa, Kendra L., Ranta, Jordan, Napit, Krishtee, Luma, Lady Beverly, Robinson, Tamara, Dinkel, Danae, Schabloske, Laura, Watanabe‐Galloway, Shinobu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9492624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12665
_version_ 1784793523790282752
author Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
Ranta, Jordan
Napit, Krishtee
Luma, Lady Beverly
Robinson, Tamara
Dinkel, Danae
Schabloske, Laura
Watanabe‐Galloway, Shinobu
author_facet Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
Ranta, Jordan
Napit, Krishtee
Luma, Lady Beverly
Robinson, Tamara
Dinkel, Danae
Schabloske, Laura
Watanabe‐Galloway, Shinobu
author_sort Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Rural (vs urban) patients experience poorer cancer outcomes and are less likely to be engaged in cancer prevention, such as screening. As part of a community needs assessment, we explored rural cancer survivors’ and caregivers’ experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care services. METHODS: We conducted 3 focus groups (N = 20) in Spring 2021 in rural Nebraska. FINDINGS: Three patterns of cancer diagnosis were regular care/screening without noticeable symptoms, treatment for symptoms not initially identified as cancer related, and symptom self‐identification. Most participants, regardless of how diagnosis was made, had positive experiences with timely referral for testing (imaging and biopsy) and specialist care. Physician interpersonal skills set the tone for patient‐provider communication, which colored the perception of overall care. Participants with physicians and care teams that were perceived as “considerate,” “compassionate,” and “caring” had positive experiences. Participants identified specific obstacles to care, including financial barriers, transportation, and lack of support groups, as well as more general cultural barriers. Survivors and caregivers identified organization‐based supports that helped them address such barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Rural populations have unique perspectives about cancer care. Our results are being used by the state cancer coalition, state cancer control program, and the National Cancer Institute‐designated cancer center to prioritize outreach and interventions aimed to reduce rural cancer disparities, such as revitalizing lay cancer navigator programs, conducting webinars for primary care and cancer specialty providers to discuss these findings and identify potential interventions, and collaborating with national and regional cancer support organizations to expand reach in rural communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9492624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94926242022-12-28 Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers Ratnapradipa, Kendra L. Ranta, Jordan Napit, Krishtee Luma, Lady Beverly Robinson, Tamara Dinkel, Danae Schabloske, Laura Watanabe‐Galloway, Shinobu J Rural Health Cancer‐related Services PURPOSE: Rural (vs urban) patients experience poorer cancer outcomes and are less likely to be engaged in cancer prevention, such as screening. As part of a community needs assessment, we explored rural cancer survivors’ and caregivers’ experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care services. METHODS: We conducted 3 focus groups (N = 20) in Spring 2021 in rural Nebraska. FINDINGS: Three patterns of cancer diagnosis were regular care/screening without noticeable symptoms, treatment for symptoms not initially identified as cancer related, and symptom self‐identification. Most participants, regardless of how diagnosis was made, had positive experiences with timely referral for testing (imaging and biopsy) and specialist care. Physician interpersonal skills set the tone for patient‐provider communication, which colored the perception of overall care. Participants with physicians and care teams that were perceived as “considerate,” “compassionate,” and “caring” had positive experiences. Participants identified specific obstacles to care, including financial barriers, transportation, and lack of support groups, as well as more general cultural barriers. Survivors and caregivers identified organization‐based supports that helped them address such barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Rural populations have unique perspectives about cancer care. Our results are being used by the state cancer coalition, state cancer control program, and the National Cancer Institute‐designated cancer center to prioritize outreach and interventions aimed to reduce rural cancer disparities, such as revitalizing lay cancer navigator programs, conducting webinars for primary care and cancer specialty providers to discuss these findings and identify potential interventions, and collaborating with national and regional cancer support organizations to expand reach in rural communities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9492624/ /pubmed/35381622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12665 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Rural Health published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Rural Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Cancer‐related Services
Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
Ranta, Jordan
Napit, Krishtee
Luma, Lady Beverly
Robinson, Tamara
Dinkel, Danae
Schabloske, Laura
Watanabe‐Galloway, Shinobu
Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title_full Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title_fullStr Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title_short Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
title_sort qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers
topic Cancer‐related Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9492624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12665
work_keys_str_mv AT ratnapradipakendral qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT rantajordan qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT napitkrishtee qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT lumaladybeverly qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT robinsontamara qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT dinkeldanae qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT schabloskelaura qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers
AT watanabegallowayshinobu qualitativeanalysisofcancercareexperiencesamongruralcancersurvivorsandcaregivers