Cargando…
The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and N...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y |
_version_ | 1784793640292319232 |
---|---|
author | Satchell, Tyra Diaz, Megan C. Stephens, Daniel Bertrand, Adrian Schillo, Barbara A. Whitsel, Laurie P. |
author_facet | Satchell, Tyra Diaz, Megan C. Stephens, Daniel Bertrand, Adrian Schillo, Barbara A. Whitsel, Laurie P. |
author_sort | Satchell, Tyra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and New Jersey’s partial restriction on the sale of flavored tobacco products. METHODS: NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data were used to construct four log per capita dependent variables: e-liquid milliliters, cigarette packs, cigars, and smokeless tobacco ounces for products flavored as fruit, menthol, mint, tobacco and other. All models used difference-in-differences regressions, with Virginia and Pennsylvania serving as controls. The models controlled for state level product prices, population percentages by race/ethnicity, proportion male, median household income, unemployment rate, minimum legal sales age, tobacco 21 policies, and cumulative cases and deaths of COVID-19; the models accounted for time-specific factors by using 4-week period fixed-effects. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in sales across all flavored tobacco products in Massachusetts, including fruit [-99.83%, p < 0.01], menthol [-98.33%, p < 0.01], and all other flavored [-99.28%, p < 0.01] e-cigarettes. The cigar group “all other-flavors" [-99.92%, p < 0.01] and menthol flavored cigarettes [-95.36%, p < 0.01] also significantly decreased. In New Jersey, there was a significant decrease in per capita sales of menthol-flavored e-cigarettes [-83.80%, p < 0.05] and cigar group “all other-flavors" experienced a significant increase in per capita sales [380.66%, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the impact of sales prohibitions on reducing sales of flavored tobacco products. Statewide comprehensive approaches appear more effective than partial restrictions and should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Results from this study support emerging research that demonstrates the promising effects of comprehensive flavoring sales prohibitions. This study can be used to inform future flavored tobacco product policy solutions developed by advocates and policy makers to curb overall tobacco initiation and use by youth and adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9493160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94931602022-09-22 The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products Satchell, Tyra Diaz, Megan C. Stephens, Daniel Bertrand, Adrian Schillo, Barbara A. Whitsel, Laurie P. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and New Jersey’s partial restriction on the sale of flavored tobacco products. METHODS: NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data were used to construct four log per capita dependent variables: e-liquid milliliters, cigarette packs, cigars, and smokeless tobacco ounces for products flavored as fruit, menthol, mint, tobacco and other. All models used difference-in-differences regressions, with Virginia and Pennsylvania serving as controls. The models controlled for state level product prices, population percentages by race/ethnicity, proportion male, median household income, unemployment rate, minimum legal sales age, tobacco 21 policies, and cumulative cases and deaths of COVID-19; the models accounted for time-specific factors by using 4-week period fixed-effects. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in sales across all flavored tobacco products in Massachusetts, including fruit [-99.83%, p < 0.01], menthol [-98.33%, p < 0.01], and all other flavored [-99.28%, p < 0.01] e-cigarettes. The cigar group “all other-flavors" [-99.92%, p < 0.01] and menthol flavored cigarettes [-95.36%, p < 0.01] also significantly decreased. In New Jersey, there was a significant decrease in per capita sales of menthol-flavored e-cigarettes [-83.80%, p < 0.05] and cigar group “all other-flavors" experienced a significant increase in per capita sales [380.66%, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the impact of sales prohibitions on reducing sales of flavored tobacco products. Statewide comprehensive approaches appear more effective than partial restrictions and should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Results from this study support emerging research that demonstrates the promising effects of comprehensive flavoring sales prohibitions. This study can be used to inform future flavored tobacco product policy solutions developed by advocates and policy makers to curb overall tobacco initiation and use by youth and adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9493160/ /pubmed/36138373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Satchell, Tyra Diaz, Megan C. Stephens, Daniel Bertrand, Adrian Schillo, Barbara A. Whitsel, Laurie P. The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title | The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title_full | The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title_fullStr | The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title_short | The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
title_sort | impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT satchelltyra theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT diazmeganc theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT stephensdaniel theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT bertrandadrian theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT schillobarbaraa theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT whitsellauriep theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT satchelltyra impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT diazmeganc impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT stephensdaniel impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT bertrandadrian impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT schillobarbaraa impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts AT whitsellauriep impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts |