Cargando…

The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products

BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satchell, Tyra, Diaz, Megan C., Stephens, Daniel, Bertrand, Adrian, Schillo, Barbara A., Whitsel, Laurie P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y
_version_ 1784793640292319232
author Satchell, Tyra
Diaz, Megan C.
Stephens, Daniel
Bertrand, Adrian
Schillo, Barbara A.
Whitsel, Laurie P.
author_facet Satchell, Tyra
Diaz, Megan C.
Stephens, Daniel
Bertrand, Adrian
Schillo, Barbara A.
Whitsel, Laurie P.
author_sort Satchell, Tyra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and New Jersey’s partial restriction on the sale of flavored tobacco products. METHODS: NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data were used to construct four log per capita dependent variables: e-liquid milliliters, cigarette packs, cigars, and smokeless tobacco ounces for products flavored as fruit, menthol, mint, tobacco and other. All models used difference-in-differences regressions, with Virginia and Pennsylvania serving as controls. The models controlled for state level product prices, population percentages by race/ethnicity, proportion male, median household income, unemployment rate, minimum legal sales age, tobacco 21 policies, and cumulative cases and deaths of COVID-19; the models accounted for time-specific factors by using 4-week period fixed-effects. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in sales across all flavored tobacco products in Massachusetts, including fruit [-99.83%, p < 0.01], menthol [-98.33%, p < 0.01], and all other flavored [-99.28%, p < 0.01] e-cigarettes. The cigar group “all other-flavors" [-99.92%, p < 0.01] and menthol flavored cigarettes [-95.36%, p < 0.01] also significantly decreased. In New Jersey, there was a significant decrease in per capita sales of menthol-flavored e-cigarettes [-83.80%, p < 0.05] and cigar group “all other-flavors" experienced a significant increase in per capita sales [380.66%, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the impact of sales prohibitions on reducing sales of flavored tobacco products. Statewide comprehensive approaches appear more effective than partial restrictions and should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Results from this study support emerging research that demonstrates the promising effects of comprehensive flavoring sales prohibitions. This study can be used to inform future flavored tobacco product policy solutions developed by advocates and policy makers to curb overall tobacco initiation and use by youth and adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9493160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94931602022-09-22 The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products Satchell, Tyra Diaz, Megan C. Stephens, Daniel Bertrand, Adrian Schillo, Barbara A. Whitsel, Laurie P. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Flavored tobacco products are highly appealing to youth. The Federal government lacks a comprehensive flavored tobacco products policy and states have adopted different approaches restricting these products. This study analyzes the impact of Massachusetts’ comprehensive prohibition and New Jersey’s partial restriction on the sale of flavored tobacco products. METHODS: NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data were used to construct four log per capita dependent variables: e-liquid milliliters, cigarette packs, cigars, and smokeless tobacco ounces for products flavored as fruit, menthol, mint, tobacco and other. All models used difference-in-differences regressions, with Virginia and Pennsylvania serving as controls. The models controlled for state level product prices, population percentages by race/ethnicity, proportion male, median household income, unemployment rate, minimum legal sales age, tobacco 21 policies, and cumulative cases and deaths of COVID-19; the models accounted for time-specific factors by using 4-week period fixed-effects. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in sales across all flavored tobacco products in Massachusetts, including fruit [-99.83%, p < 0.01], menthol [-98.33%, p < 0.01], and all other flavored [-99.28%, p < 0.01] e-cigarettes. The cigar group “all other-flavors" [-99.92%, p < 0.01] and menthol flavored cigarettes [-95.36%, p < 0.01] also significantly decreased. In New Jersey, there was a significant decrease in per capita sales of menthol-flavored e-cigarettes [-83.80%, p < 0.05] and cigar group “all other-flavors" experienced a significant increase in per capita sales [380.66%, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the impact of sales prohibitions on reducing sales of flavored tobacco products. Statewide comprehensive approaches appear more effective than partial restrictions and should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Results from this study support emerging research that demonstrates the promising effects of comprehensive flavoring sales prohibitions. This study can be used to inform future flavored tobacco product policy solutions developed by advocates and policy makers to curb overall tobacco initiation and use by youth and adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y. BioMed Central 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9493160/ /pubmed/36138373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Satchell, Tyra
Diaz, Megan C.
Stephens, Daniel
Bertrand, Adrian
Schillo, Barbara A.
Whitsel, Laurie P.
The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title_full The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title_fullStr The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title_full_unstemmed The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title_short The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
title_sort impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9493160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14172-y
work_keys_str_mv AT satchelltyra theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT diazmeganc theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT stephensdaniel theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT bertrandadrian theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT schillobarbaraa theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT whitsellauriep theimpactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT satchelltyra impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT diazmeganc impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT stephensdaniel impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT bertrandadrian impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT schillobarbaraa impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts
AT whitsellauriep impactoftwostatelevelapproachestorestrictingthesaleofflavoredtobaccoproducts