Cargando…
Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England
INTRODUCTION: Choice of birth setting is important and it is valuable to know how reconfiguring available settings may affect midwifery staffing needs. COVID-19-related health system pressures have meant restriction of community births. We aimed to model the potential of service reconfigurations to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36130758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051747 |
_version_ | 1784793743137701888 |
---|---|
author | Grollman, Christopher Daniele, Marina A S Brigante, Lia Knight, Gwenan M Latina, Laura Morgan, Andrei S Downe, Soo |
author_facet | Grollman, Christopher Daniele, Marina A S Brigante, Lia Knight, Gwenan M Latina, Laura Morgan, Andrei S Downe, Soo |
author_sort | Grollman, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Choice of birth setting is important and it is valuable to know how reconfiguring available settings may affect midwifery staffing needs. COVID-19-related health system pressures have meant restriction of community births. We aimed to model the potential of service reconfigurations to offset midwifery staffing shortages. METHODS: We adapted the Birthrate Plus method to develop a tool that models the effects on intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing requirements of changing service configurations for low-risk births. We tested our tool on two hypothetical model trusts with different baseline configurations of hospital and community low-risk birth services, representing those most common in England, and applied it to scenarios with midwifery staffing shortages of 15%, 25% and 35%. In scenarios with midwifery staffing shortages above 15%, we modelled restricting community births in line with professional guidance on COVID-19 service reconfiguration. For shortages of 15%, we modelled expanding community births per the target of the Maternity Transformation programme. RESULTS: Expanding community births with 15% shortages required 0.0 and 0.1 whole-time equivalent more midwives in our respective trusts compared with baseline, representing 0% and 0.1% of overall staffing requirements net of shortages. Restricting home births with 25% shortages reduced midwifery staffing need by 0.1 midwives (–0.1% of staffing) and 0.3 midwives (–0.3%). Suspending community births with 35% shortages meant changes of –0.3 midwives (–0.3%) and –0.5 midwives (–0.5%) in the two trusts. Sensitivity analysis showed that our results were robust even under extreme assumptions. CONCLUSION: Our model found that reconfiguring maternity services in response to shortages has a negligible effect on intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing needs. Given this, with lower degrees of shortage, managers can consider increasing community birth options where there is demand. In situations of severe shortage, reconfiguration cannot recoup the shortage and managers must decide how to modify service arrangements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9494012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94940122022-09-22 Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England Grollman, Christopher Daniele, Marina A S Brigante, Lia Knight, Gwenan M Latina, Laura Morgan, Andrei S Downe, Soo BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Choice of birth setting is important and it is valuable to know how reconfiguring available settings may affect midwifery staffing needs. COVID-19-related health system pressures have meant restriction of community births. We aimed to model the potential of service reconfigurations to offset midwifery staffing shortages. METHODS: We adapted the Birthrate Plus method to develop a tool that models the effects on intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing requirements of changing service configurations for low-risk births. We tested our tool on two hypothetical model trusts with different baseline configurations of hospital and community low-risk birth services, representing those most common in England, and applied it to scenarios with midwifery staffing shortages of 15%, 25% and 35%. In scenarios with midwifery staffing shortages above 15%, we modelled restricting community births in line with professional guidance on COVID-19 service reconfiguration. For shortages of 15%, we modelled expanding community births per the target of the Maternity Transformation programme. RESULTS: Expanding community births with 15% shortages required 0.0 and 0.1 whole-time equivalent more midwives in our respective trusts compared with baseline, representing 0% and 0.1% of overall staffing requirements net of shortages. Restricting home births with 25% shortages reduced midwifery staffing need by 0.1 midwives (–0.1% of staffing) and 0.3 midwives (–0.3%). Suspending community births with 35% shortages meant changes of –0.3 midwives (–0.3%) and –0.5 midwives (–0.5%) in the two trusts. Sensitivity analysis showed that our results were robust even under extreme assumptions. CONCLUSION: Our model found that reconfiguring maternity services in response to shortages has a negligible effect on intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing needs. Given this, with lower degrees of shortage, managers can consider increasing community birth options where there is demand. In situations of severe shortage, reconfiguration cannot recoup the shortage and managers must decide how to modify service arrangements. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9494012/ /pubmed/36130758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051747 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Grollman, Christopher Daniele, Marina A S Brigante, Lia Knight, Gwenan M Latina, Laura Morgan, Andrei S Downe, Soo Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title | Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title_full | Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title_fullStr | Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title_short | Maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in England |
title_sort | maternity service reconfigurations for intrapartum and postnatal midwifery staffing shortages: modelling of low-risk births in england |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36130758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grollmanchristopher maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT danielemarinaas maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT brigantelia maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT knightgwenanm maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT latinalaura maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT morganandreis maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland AT downesoo maternityservicereconfigurationsforintrapartumandpostnatalmidwiferystaffingshortagesmodellingoflowriskbirthsinengland |