Cargando…

Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Stroke is the most common and serious neurological condition, which can lead to death, limited functionality, and reduced quality of life. Studies with conflicting results and various methodological limitations have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of neurodynamic interventions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seid, Abubeker Alebachew, Moloro, Abdulkerim Hassen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069824
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38956
_version_ 1784793766726467584
author Seid, Abubeker Alebachew
Moloro, Abdulkerim Hassen
author_facet Seid, Abubeker Alebachew
Moloro, Abdulkerim Hassen
author_sort Seid, Abubeker Alebachew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke is the most common and serious neurological condition, which can lead to death, limited functionality, and reduced quality of life. Studies with conflicting results and various methodological limitations have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of neurodynamic interventions for patients with stroke. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the pooled effectiveness of different neurodynamic interventions on patients with stroke. METHODS: The PubMed, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases will be searched for studies published with full text in the English language from inception to date. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of different neurodynamic techniques on patients with stroke will be included. The primary outcome measures will include pain, disability/function, and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures will include physical performance measures such as balance, range of motion, muscle strength, and specific diagnostic and neurodynamic test outcomes. The screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. The PEDro scale will be used to systematically appraise the methodological quality. Review Manager V.5.4 software will be used for statistical analysis. Weighted mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% CIs and P values will be used to calculate the treatment effect for each outcome variable. RESULTS: Search terms and search databases have been identified. The data extraction sheet has also been developed. This study is expected to be completed by the end of 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness and use of neurodynamic interventions for patients with stroke in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022319972; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=319972 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/38956
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9494217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94942172022-09-23 Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Seid, Abubeker Alebachew Moloro, Abdulkerim Hassen JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Stroke is the most common and serious neurological condition, which can lead to death, limited functionality, and reduced quality of life. Studies with conflicting results and various methodological limitations have been conducted to assess the effectiveness of neurodynamic interventions for patients with stroke. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the pooled effectiveness of different neurodynamic interventions on patients with stroke. METHODS: The PubMed, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases will be searched for studies published with full text in the English language from inception to date. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of different neurodynamic techniques on patients with stroke will be included. The primary outcome measures will include pain, disability/function, and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures will include physical performance measures such as balance, range of motion, muscle strength, and specific diagnostic and neurodynamic test outcomes. The screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. The PEDro scale will be used to systematically appraise the methodological quality. Review Manager V.5.4 software will be used for statistical analysis. Weighted mean difference or standardized mean difference with 95% CIs and P values will be used to calculate the treatment effect for each outcome variable. RESULTS: Search terms and search databases have been identified. The data extraction sheet has also been developed. This study is expected to be completed by the end of 2022. CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness and use of neurodynamic interventions for patients with stroke in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022319972; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=319972 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/38956 JMIR Publications 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9494217/ /pubmed/36069824 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38956 Text en ©Abubeker Alebachew Seid, Abdulkerim Hassen Moloro. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Seid, Abubeker Alebachew
Moloro, Abdulkerim Hassen
Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Interventions in Patients With Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of neurodynamic interventions in patients with stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069824
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/38956
work_keys_str_mv AT seidabubekeralebachew effectivenessofneurodynamicinterventionsinpatientswithstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moloroabdulkerimhassen effectivenessofneurodynamicinterventionsinpatientswithstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis