Cargando…

Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs

Humanoid robotic upper limbs including the robotic hand and robotic arm are widely studied as the important parts of a humanoid robot. A robotic upper limb with light weight and high output can perform more tasks. The drive system is one of the main factors affecting the weight and output of the rob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yiwei, Li, Wenyang, Togo, Shunta, Yokoi, Hiroshi, Jiang, Yinlai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AAAS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285140
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9817487
_version_ 1784793850823311360
author Wang, Yiwei
Li, Wenyang
Togo, Shunta
Yokoi, Hiroshi
Jiang, Yinlai
author_facet Wang, Yiwei
Li, Wenyang
Togo, Shunta
Yokoi, Hiroshi
Jiang, Yinlai
author_sort Wang, Yiwei
collection PubMed
description Humanoid robotic upper limbs including the robotic hand and robotic arm are widely studied as the important parts of a humanoid robot. A robotic upper limb with light weight and high output can perform more tasks. The drive system is one of the main factors affecting the weight and output of the robotic upper limb, and therefore, the main purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the effects of the different drive methods on the overall structure. In this paper, we first introduce the advantages and disadvantages of the main drive methods such as tendon, gear, link, fluid (hydraulic and pneumatic), belt, chain, and screw drives. The design of the drive system is an essential factor to allow the humanoid robotic upper limb to exhibit the structural features and functions of the human upper limb. Therefore, the specific applications of each drive method on the humanoid robotic limbs are illustrated and briefly analyzed. Meanwhile, we compared the differences in the weight and payload (or grasping force) of the robotic hands and robotic arms with different drive methods. The results showed that the tendon drive system is easier to achieve light weight due to its simple structure, while the gear drive system can achieve a larger torque ratio, which results in a larger output torque. Further, the weight of the actuator accounts for a larger proportion of the total weight, and a reasonable external placement of the actuator is also beneficial to achieve light weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9494694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AAAS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94946942022-10-24 Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs Wang, Yiwei Li, Wenyang Togo, Shunta Yokoi, Hiroshi Jiang, Yinlai Cyborg Bionic Syst Review Article Humanoid robotic upper limbs including the robotic hand and robotic arm are widely studied as the important parts of a humanoid robot. A robotic upper limb with light weight and high output can perform more tasks. The drive system is one of the main factors affecting the weight and output of the robotic upper limb, and therefore, the main purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the effects of the different drive methods on the overall structure. In this paper, we first introduce the advantages and disadvantages of the main drive methods such as tendon, gear, link, fluid (hydraulic and pneumatic), belt, chain, and screw drives. The design of the drive system is an essential factor to allow the humanoid robotic upper limb to exhibit the structural features and functions of the human upper limb. Therefore, the specific applications of each drive method on the humanoid robotic limbs are illustrated and briefly analyzed. Meanwhile, we compared the differences in the weight and payload (or grasping force) of the robotic hands and robotic arms with different drive methods. The results showed that the tendon drive system is easier to achieve light weight due to its simple structure, while the gear drive system can achieve a larger torque ratio, which results in a larger output torque. Further, the weight of the actuator accounts for a larger proportion of the total weight, and a reasonable external placement of the actuator is also beneficial to achieve light weight. AAAS 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9494694/ /pubmed/36285140 http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9817487 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yiwei Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Exclusive Licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Review Article
Wang, Yiwei
Li, Wenyang
Togo, Shunta
Yokoi, Hiroshi
Jiang, Yinlai
Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title_full Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title_fullStr Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title_full_unstemmed Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title_short Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
title_sort survey on main drive methods used in humanoid robotic upper limbs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285140
http://dx.doi.org/10.34133/2021/9817487
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyiwei surveyonmaindrivemethodsusedinhumanoidroboticupperlimbs
AT liwenyang surveyonmaindrivemethodsusedinhumanoidroboticupperlimbs
AT togoshunta surveyonmaindrivemethodsusedinhumanoidroboticupperlimbs
AT yokoihiroshi surveyonmaindrivemethodsusedinhumanoidroboticupperlimbs
AT jiangyinlai surveyonmaindrivemethodsusedinhumanoidroboticupperlimbs