Cargando…

Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy

For the optimal management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), secondary loss of response (LOR) and primary non-response to biologics is a critical issue. This article aimed to summarize the current literature on the use of cytapheresis (CAP) in patients with UC showing a poor response or LOR to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iizuka, Masahiro, Etou, Takeshi, Sagara, Shiho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.4959
_version_ 1784793897871867904
author Iizuka, Masahiro
Etou, Takeshi
Sagara, Shiho
author_facet Iizuka, Masahiro
Etou, Takeshi
Sagara, Shiho
author_sort Iizuka, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description For the optimal management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), secondary loss of response (LOR) and primary non-response to biologics is a critical issue. This article aimed to summarize the current literature on the use of cytapheresis (CAP) in patients with UC showing a poor response or LOR to biologics and discuss its advantages and limitations. Further, we summarized the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing insufficient response to thiopurines or immunomodulators (IM). Eight studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC with inadequate responses to thiopurines or IM. There were no significant differences in the rate of remission and steroid-free remission between patients exposed or not exposed to thiopurines or IM. Three studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing an insufficient response to biologic therapies. Mean remission rates of biologics exposed or unexposed patients were 29.4 % and 44.2%, respectively. Fourteen studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in combination with biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease showing a poor response or LOR to biologics. The rates of remission/response and steroid-free remission in patients with UC ranged 32%-69% (mean: 48.0%, median: 42.9%) and 9%-75% (mean: 40.7%, median: 38%), respectively. CAP had the same effectiveness for remission induction with or without prior failure on thiopurines or IM but showed little benefit in patients with UC refractory to biologics. Although heterogeneity existed in the efficacy of the combination therapy with CAP and biologics, these combination therapies induced clinical remission/response and steroid-free remission in more than 40% of patients with UC refractory to biologics on average. Given the excellent safety profile of CAP, this combination therapy can be an alternative therapeutic strategy for UC refractory to biologics. Extensive prospective studies are needed to understand the efficacy of combination therapy with CAP and biologics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9494931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94949312022-09-23 Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy Iizuka, Masahiro Etou, Takeshi Sagara, Shiho World J Gastroenterol Minireviews For the optimal management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), secondary loss of response (LOR) and primary non-response to biologics is a critical issue. This article aimed to summarize the current literature on the use of cytapheresis (CAP) in patients with UC showing a poor response or LOR to biologics and discuss its advantages and limitations. Further, we summarized the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing insufficient response to thiopurines or immunomodulators (IM). Eight studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC with inadequate responses to thiopurines or IM. There were no significant differences in the rate of remission and steroid-free remission between patients exposed or not exposed to thiopurines or IM. Three studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing an insufficient response to biologic therapies. Mean remission rates of biologics exposed or unexposed patients were 29.4 % and 44.2%, respectively. Fourteen studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in combination with biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease showing a poor response or LOR to biologics. The rates of remission/response and steroid-free remission in patients with UC ranged 32%-69% (mean: 48.0%, median: 42.9%) and 9%-75% (mean: 40.7%, median: 38%), respectively. CAP had the same effectiveness for remission induction with or without prior failure on thiopurines or IM but showed little benefit in patients with UC refractory to biologics. Although heterogeneity existed in the efficacy of the combination therapy with CAP and biologics, these combination therapies induced clinical remission/response and steroid-free remission in more than 40% of patients with UC refractory to biologics on average. Given the excellent safety profile of CAP, this combination therapy can be an alternative therapeutic strategy for UC refractory to biologics. Extensive prospective studies are needed to understand the efficacy of combination therapy with CAP and biologics. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-09-14 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9494931/ /pubmed/36160647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.4959 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Minireviews
Iizuka, Masahiro
Etou, Takeshi
Sagara, Shiho
Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title_full Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title_fullStr Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title_short Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
title_sort efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.4959
work_keys_str_mv AT iizukamasahiro efficacyofcytapheresisinpatientswithulcerativecolitisshowinginsufficientorlostresponsetobiologictherapy
AT etoutakeshi efficacyofcytapheresisinpatientswithulcerativecolitisshowinginsufficientorlostresponsetobiologictherapy
AT sagarashiho efficacyofcytapheresisinpatientswithulcerativecolitisshowinginsufficientorlostresponsetobiologictherapy