Cargando…

Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach

(1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-suscept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daoud, Frederic C., M’Zali, Fatima, Zabala, Arnaud, Moore, Nicholas, Rogues, Anne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195
_version_ 1784793905414275072
author Daoud, Frederic C.
M’Zali, Fatima
Zabala, Arnaud
Moore, Nicholas
Rogues, Anne-Marie
author_facet Daoud, Frederic C.
M’Zali, Fatima
Zabala, Arnaud
Moore, Nicholas
Rogues, Anne-Marie
author_sort Daoud, Frederic C.
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-susceptible microorganisms common in surgical site infections (SSIs) and a segment of each TS. Microbial concentrations were measured at T0, T4, T8 and T24 h. Similar non-triclosan sutures (NTS) were used as controls. Microbial concentrations were plotted and analysed with panel analysis. They were predicted over time with a double-exponential model and four parameters fitted to each TS × microorganism combination. (3) Results: The microbial concentration was associated with the triclosan presence, timeslot and microorganism. It was not associated with the suture material. All combinations shared a common pattern with an early steep concentration reduction from baseline to 4–8 h, followed by a concentration up to a 24-h plateau in most cases with a mild concentration increase. (4) Conclusions: Microorganisms seem to be predominantly killed by contact or near-contact killing with the suture rather than the triclosan concentration in the culture medium. No significant in vitro antimicrobial pharmacodynamic difference between the three TS is identified. Triclosan can reduce the suture microbial colonisation and SSI risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9494962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94949622022-09-23 Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach Daoud, Frederic C. M’Zali, Fatima Zabala, Arnaud Moore, Nicholas Rogues, Anne-Marie Antibiotics (Basel) Article (1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-susceptible microorganisms common in surgical site infections (SSIs) and a segment of each TS. Microbial concentrations were measured at T0, T4, T8 and T24 h. Similar non-triclosan sutures (NTS) were used as controls. Microbial concentrations were plotted and analysed with panel analysis. They were predicted over time with a double-exponential model and four parameters fitted to each TS × microorganism combination. (3) Results: The microbial concentration was associated with the triclosan presence, timeslot and microorganism. It was not associated with the suture material. All combinations shared a common pattern with an early steep concentration reduction from baseline to 4–8 h, followed by a concentration up to a 24-h plateau in most cases with a mild concentration increase. (4) Conclusions: Microorganisms seem to be predominantly killed by contact or near-contact killing with the suture rather than the triclosan concentration in the culture medium. No significant in vitro antimicrobial pharmacodynamic difference between the three TS is identified. Triclosan can reduce the suture microbial colonisation and SSI risk. MDPI 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9494962/ /pubmed/36139974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Daoud, Frederic C.
M’Zali, Fatima
Zabala, Arnaud
Moore, Nicholas
Rogues, Anne-Marie
Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title_full Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title_fullStr Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title_short Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
title_sort do different sutures with triclosan have different antimicrobial activities? a pharmacodynamic approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139974
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195
work_keys_str_mv AT daoudfredericc dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach
AT mzalifatima dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach
AT zabalaarnaud dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach
AT moorenicholas dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach
AT roguesannemarie dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach