Cargando…
Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach
(1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-suscept...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195 |
_version_ | 1784793905414275072 |
---|---|
author | Daoud, Frederic C. M’Zali, Fatima Zabala, Arnaud Moore, Nicholas Rogues, Anne-Marie |
author_facet | Daoud, Frederic C. M’Zali, Fatima Zabala, Arnaud Moore, Nicholas Rogues, Anne-Marie |
author_sort | Daoud, Frederic C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-susceptible microorganisms common in surgical site infections (SSIs) and a segment of each TS. Microbial concentrations were measured at T0, T4, T8 and T24 h. Similar non-triclosan sutures (NTS) were used as controls. Microbial concentrations were plotted and analysed with panel analysis. They were predicted over time with a double-exponential model and four parameters fitted to each TS × microorganism combination. (3) Results: The microbial concentration was associated with the triclosan presence, timeslot and microorganism. It was not associated with the suture material. All combinations shared a common pattern with an early steep concentration reduction from baseline to 4–8 h, followed by a concentration up to a 24-h plateau in most cases with a mild concentration increase. (4) Conclusions: Microorganisms seem to be predominantly killed by contact or near-contact killing with the suture rather than the triclosan concentration in the culture medium. No significant in vitro antimicrobial pharmacodynamic difference between the three TS is identified. Triclosan can reduce the suture microbial colonisation and SSI risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9494962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94949622022-09-23 Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach Daoud, Frederic C. M’Zali, Fatima Zabala, Arnaud Moore, Nicholas Rogues, Anne-Marie Antibiotics (Basel) Article (1) Background: Three antimicrobial absorbable sutures have different triclosan (TS) loads, triclosan release kinetics and hydrolysis times. This in vitro study aims to analyse and compare their antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. (2) Methods: Time-kill assays were performed with eight triclosan-susceptible microorganisms common in surgical site infections (SSIs) and a segment of each TS. Microbial concentrations were measured at T0, T4, T8 and T24 h. Similar non-triclosan sutures (NTS) were used as controls. Microbial concentrations were plotted and analysed with panel analysis. They were predicted over time with a double-exponential model and four parameters fitted to each TS × microorganism combination. (3) Results: The microbial concentration was associated with the triclosan presence, timeslot and microorganism. It was not associated with the suture material. All combinations shared a common pattern with an early steep concentration reduction from baseline to 4–8 h, followed by a concentration up to a 24-h plateau in most cases with a mild concentration increase. (4) Conclusions: Microorganisms seem to be predominantly killed by contact or near-contact killing with the suture rather than the triclosan concentration in the culture medium. No significant in vitro antimicrobial pharmacodynamic difference between the three TS is identified. Triclosan can reduce the suture microbial colonisation and SSI risk. MDPI 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9494962/ /pubmed/36139974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Daoud, Frederic C. M’Zali, Fatima Zabala, Arnaud Moore, Nicholas Rogues, Anne-Marie Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title | Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title_full | Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title_fullStr | Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title_short | Do Different Sutures with Triclosan Have Different Antimicrobial Activities? A Pharmacodynamic Approach |
title_sort | do different sutures with triclosan have different antimicrobial activities? a pharmacodynamic approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139974 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daoudfredericc dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach AT mzalifatima dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach AT zabalaarnaud dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach AT moorenicholas dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach AT roguesannemarie dodifferentsutureswithtriclosanhavedifferentantimicrobialactivitiesapharmacodynamicapproach |