Cargando…

Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) have been extensively used for estimation of genetic diversity in wild vertebrate populations on account of their exceptionally high polymorphism and key role in pathogen resistance. The complexity of the MHC region varies greatly,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svetličić, Ida, Konjević, Dean, Bužan, Elena, Bujanić, Miljenko, Duniš, Luka, Stipoljev, Sunčica, Martinčić, Jelena, Šurina, Mihaela, Galov, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12182452
_version_ 1784793955000385536
author Svetličić, Ida
Konjević, Dean
Bužan, Elena
Bujanić, Miljenko
Duniš, Luka
Stipoljev, Sunčica
Martinčić, Jelena
Šurina, Mihaela
Galov, Ana
author_facet Svetličić, Ida
Konjević, Dean
Bužan, Elena
Bujanić, Miljenko
Duniš, Luka
Stipoljev, Sunčica
Martinčić, Jelena
Šurina, Mihaela
Galov, Ana
author_sort Svetličić, Ida
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) have been extensively used for estimation of genetic diversity in wild vertebrate populations on account of their exceptionally high polymorphism and key role in pathogen resistance. The complexity of the MHC region varies greatly, even between closely related species, and consequently influences the choice of genotyping strategy. Here, we compared and evaluated MHC genotyping in a single-locus species, the roe deer, and red deer, a species with multiple loci, by utilisation of molecular cloning and two high-throughput sequencing platforms (Illumina and Ion Torrent). For high-throughput data processing, we applied a web version of the Amplicon Sequencing Analysis Tools that analyses the first 5000 reads per sample as well as its locally installed script that analyses a total number of reads per sample, up to a maximum of 200,000. We observed genotype discrepancies only in red deer, with Illumina sequencing scoring the maximum number of detected alleles, regardless of the number of reads used for data analysis. This study facilitates the adoption of an optimal strategy for MHC genotyping in wild mammals that does not include complex bioinformatic analyses. ABSTRACT: Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are widely recognised as valuable markers for wildlife genetic studies given their extreme polymorphism and functional importance in fitness-related traits. Newly developed genotyping methods, which rely on the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), are gradually replacing traditional cloning and Sanger sequencing methods in MHC genotyping studies. Allele calling in NGS methods remains challenging due to extreme polymorphism and locus multiplication in the MHC coupled with allele amplification bias and the generation of artificial sequences. In this study, we compared the performance of molecular cloning with Illumina and Ion Torrent NGS sequencing in MHC-DRB genotyping of single-locus species (roe deer) and species with multiple DRB loci (red deer) in an attempt to adopt a reliable and straightforward method that does not require complex bioinformatic analyses. Our results show that all methods work similarly well in roe deer, but we demonstrate non-consistency in results across methods in red deer. With Illumina sequencing, we detected a maximum number of alleles in 10 red deer individuals (42), while other methods were somewhat less accurate as they scored 69–81% of alleles detected with Illumina sequencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9495155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94951552022-09-23 Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species Svetličić, Ida Konjević, Dean Bužan, Elena Bujanić, Miljenko Duniš, Luka Stipoljev, Sunčica Martinčić, Jelena Šurina, Mihaela Galov, Ana Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) have been extensively used for estimation of genetic diversity in wild vertebrate populations on account of their exceptionally high polymorphism and key role in pathogen resistance. The complexity of the MHC region varies greatly, even between closely related species, and consequently influences the choice of genotyping strategy. Here, we compared and evaluated MHC genotyping in a single-locus species, the roe deer, and red deer, a species with multiple loci, by utilisation of molecular cloning and two high-throughput sequencing platforms (Illumina and Ion Torrent). For high-throughput data processing, we applied a web version of the Amplicon Sequencing Analysis Tools that analyses the first 5000 reads per sample as well as its locally installed script that analyses a total number of reads per sample, up to a maximum of 200,000. We observed genotype discrepancies only in red deer, with Illumina sequencing scoring the maximum number of detected alleles, regardless of the number of reads used for data analysis. This study facilitates the adoption of an optimal strategy for MHC genotyping in wild mammals that does not include complex bioinformatic analyses. ABSTRACT: Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are widely recognised as valuable markers for wildlife genetic studies given their extreme polymorphism and functional importance in fitness-related traits. Newly developed genotyping methods, which rely on the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), are gradually replacing traditional cloning and Sanger sequencing methods in MHC genotyping studies. Allele calling in NGS methods remains challenging due to extreme polymorphism and locus multiplication in the MHC coupled with allele amplification bias and the generation of artificial sequences. In this study, we compared the performance of molecular cloning with Illumina and Ion Torrent NGS sequencing in MHC-DRB genotyping of single-locus species (roe deer) and species with multiple DRB loci (red deer) in an attempt to adopt a reliable and straightforward method that does not require complex bioinformatic analyses. Our results show that all methods work similarly well in roe deer, but we demonstrate non-consistency in results across methods in red deer. With Illumina sequencing, we detected a maximum number of alleles in 10 red deer individuals (42), while other methods were somewhat less accurate as they scored 69–81% of alleles detected with Illumina sequencing. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9495155/ /pubmed/36139311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12182452 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Svetličić, Ida
Konjević, Dean
Bužan, Elena
Bujanić, Miljenko
Duniš, Luka
Stipoljev, Sunčica
Martinčić, Jelena
Šurina, Mihaela
Galov, Ana
Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title_full Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title_short Performance Comparison of Different Approaches in Genotyping MHC-DRB: The Contrast between Single-Locus and Multi-Locus Species
title_sort performance comparison of different approaches in genotyping mhc-drb: the contrast between single-locus and multi-locus species
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36139311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12182452
work_keys_str_mv AT svetlicicida performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT konjevicdean performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT buzanelena performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT bujanicmiljenko performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT dunisluka performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT stipoljevsuncica performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT martincicjelena performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT surinamihaela performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies
AT galovana performancecomparisonofdifferentapproachesingenotypingmhcdrbthecontrastbetweensinglelocusandmultilocusspecies