Cargando…

Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of individual compared to clinic-level feedback on guideline-concordant care for 3 acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) among family medicine clinicians caring for pediatric patients. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial with a 22-month baseline, 26-month...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clegg, Herbert W., Ezzo, Stephen J., Flett, Kelly B., Anderson, William E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.212
_version_ 1784794040971034624
author Clegg, Herbert W.
Ezzo, Stephen J.
Flett, Kelly B.
Anderson, William E.
author_facet Clegg, Herbert W.
Ezzo, Stephen J.
Flett, Kelly B.
Anderson, William E.
author_sort Clegg, Herbert W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of individual compared to clinic-level feedback on guideline-concordant care for 3 acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) among family medicine clinicians caring for pediatric patients. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial with a 22-month baseline, 26-month intervention period, and 12-month postintervention period. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 26 family medicine practices (39 clinics) caring for pediatric patients in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina were selected based upon performance on guideline-concordance for 3 ARTIs, stratified by practice size. These were randomly allocated to a control group (17 clinics in 13 practices) or to an intervention group (22 clinics in 13 practices). INTERVENTIONS: All clinicians received an education session and baseline then monthly clinic-level rates for guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS), and acute otitis media (AOM). For the intervention group only, individual clinician performance was provided. RESULTS: Both intervention and control groups demonstrated improvement from baseline, but the intervention group had significantly greater improvement compared with the control group: URI (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.92; P < 0.01); ABS (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11–1.88; P < 0.01); and AOM (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.24–2.03; P < 0.01). The intervention group also showed significantly greater reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing percentage (BSAP%): odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.01. During the postintervention year, gains were maintained in the intervention group for each ARTI and for URI and AOM in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly individual peer feedback is superior to clinic-level only feedback in family medicine clinics for 3 pediatric ARTIs and for BSAP% reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04588376, Improving Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Infection by Family Physicians with Peer Comparison.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9495533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94955332022-09-26 Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback Clegg, Herbert W. Ezzo, Stephen J. Flett, Kelly B. Anderson, William E. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of individual compared to clinic-level feedback on guideline-concordant care for 3 acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) among family medicine clinicians caring for pediatric patients. DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial with a 22-month baseline, 26-month intervention period, and 12-month postintervention period. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 26 family medicine practices (39 clinics) caring for pediatric patients in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina were selected based upon performance on guideline-concordance for 3 ARTIs, stratified by practice size. These were randomly allocated to a control group (17 clinics in 13 practices) or to an intervention group (22 clinics in 13 practices). INTERVENTIONS: All clinicians received an education session and baseline then monthly clinic-level rates for guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS), and acute otitis media (AOM). For the intervention group only, individual clinician performance was provided. RESULTS: Both intervention and control groups demonstrated improvement from baseline, but the intervention group had significantly greater improvement compared with the control group: URI (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–1.92; P < 0.01); ABS (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11–1.88; P < 0.01); and AOM (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.24–2.03; P < 0.01). The intervention group also showed significantly greater reduction in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing percentage (BSAP%): odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, P < 0.01. During the postintervention year, gains were maintained in the intervention group for each ARTI and for URI and AOM in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly individual peer feedback is superior to clinic-level only feedback in family medicine clinics for 3 pediatric ARTIs and for BSAP% reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04588376, Improving Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Respiratory Infection by Family Physicians with Peer Comparison. Cambridge University Press 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9495533/ /pubmed/36168454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.212 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Clegg, Herbert W.
Ezzo, Stephen J.
Flett, Kelly B.
Anderson, William E.
Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title_full Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title_fullStr Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title_full_unstemmed Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title_short Improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: A cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
title_sort improving antibiotic prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections: a cluster randomized trial to evaluate individual versus clinic feedback
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.212
work_keys_str_mv AT cleggherbertw improvingantibioticprescribingforpediatricacuterespiratorytractinfectionsaclusterrandomizedtrialtoevaluateindividualversusclinicfeedback
AT ezzostephenj improvingantibioticprescribingforpediatricacuterespiratorytractinfectionsaclusterrandomizedtrialtoevaluateindividualversusclinicfeedback
AT flettkellyb improvingantibioticprescribingforpediatricacuterespiratorytractinfectionsaclusterrandomizedtrialtoevaluateindividualversusclinicfeedback
AT andersonwilliame improvingantibioticprescribingforpediatricacuterespiratorytractinfectionsaclusterrandomizedtrialtoevaluateindividualversusclinicfeedback