Cargando…
Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217 |
_version_ | 1784794041447088128 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Geneva M. Fitzpatrick, Margaret A. Walding, Kyle Gonzalez, Beverly Schweizer, Marin L. Suda, Katie J. Evans, Charlesnika T. |
author_facet | Wilson, Geneva M. Fitzpatrick, Margaret A. Walding, Kyle Gonzalez, Beverly Schweizer, Marin L. Suda, Katie J. Evans, Charlesnika T. |
author_sort | Wilson, Geneva M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and/or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA). OBJECTIVE: We compared the pooled clinical success of these medications to older therapies. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for C/A, C/T, I/R, and M/V studies. The main outcome was clinical success, which was assessed using random-effects models. Stratified analyses were conducted for study drug, sample size, quality, infection source, study design, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRGNO) population. Microbiological success and 28- and 30-day mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined using I(2) values. RESULTS: Overall, 25 articles met the inclusion criteria; 8 observational studies and 17 randomized control trials. We detected no difference in clinical success comparing new combination antibiotics with standard therapies for all included organisms (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96–1.51). We detected a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies I(2) = 56%. Studies that focused on patients with CRE or MDRPA infections demonstrated a strong association between treatment with new combination antibiotics and clinical success (pooled OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.60–3.57). CONCLUSIONS: C/T, C/A, I/R, and M/V are not inferior to standard therapies for treating various complicated infections, but they may have greater clinical success for treating MDRPA and CRE infections. More studies that evaluate the use of these antibiotics for drug-resistant infections are needed to determine their effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9495535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94955352022-09-26 Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis Wilson, Geneva M. Fitzpatrick, Margaret A. Walding, Kyle Gonzalez, Beverly Schweizer, Marin L. Suda, Katie J. Evans, Charlesnika T. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and/or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA). OBJECTIVE: We compared the pooled clinical success of these medications to older therapies. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for C/A, C/T, I/R, and M/V studies. The main outcome was clinical success, which was assessed using random-effects models. Stratified analyses were conducted for study drug, sample size, quality, infection source, study design, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRGNO) population. Microbiological success and 28- and 30-day mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined using I(2) values. RESULTS: Overall, 25 articles met the inclusion criteria; 8 observational studies and 17 randomized control trials. We detected no difference in clinical success comparing new combination antibiotics with standard therapies for all included organisms (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96–1.51). We detected a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies I(2) = 56%. Studies that focused on patients with CRE or MDRPA infections demonstrated a strong association between treatment with new combination antibiotics and clinical success (pooled OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.60–3.57). CONCLUSIONS: C/T, C/A, I/R, and M/V are not inferior to standard therapies for treating various complicated infections, but they may have greater clinical success for treating MDRPA and CRE infections. More studies that evaluate the use of these antibiotics for drug-resistant infections are needed to determine their effectiveness. Cambridge University Press 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9495535/ /pubmed/36168482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wilson, Geneva M. Fitzpatrick, Margaret A. Walding, Kyle Gonzalez, Beverly Schweizer, Marin L. Suda, Katie J. Evans, Charlesnika T. Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title | Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsongenevam evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT fitzpatrickmargareta evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT waldingkyle evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT gonzalezbeverly evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT schweizermarinl evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT sudakatiej evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT evanscharlesnikat evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis |