Cargando…

Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Geneva M., Fitzpatrick, Margaret A., Walding, Kyle, Gonzalez, Beverly, Schweizer, Marin L., Suda, Katie J., Evans, Charlesnika T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217
_version_ 1784794041447088128
author Wilson, Geneva M.
Fitzpatrick, Margaret A.
Walding, Kyle
Gonzalez, Beverly
Schweizer, Marin L.
Suda, Katie J.
Evans, Charlesnika T.
author_facet Wilson, Geneva M.
Fitzpatrick, Margaret A.
Walding, Kyle
Gonzalez, Beverly
Schweizer, Marin L.
Suda, Katie J.
Evans, Charlesnika T.
author_sort Wilson, Geneva M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and/or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA). OBJECTIVE: We compared the pooled clinical success of these medications to older therapies. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for C/A, C/T, I/R, and M/V studies. The main outcome was clinical success, which was assessed using random-effects models. Stratified analyses were conducted for study drug, sample size, quality, infection source, study design, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRGNO) population. Microbiological success and 28- and 30-day mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined using I(2) values. RESULTS: Overall, 25 articles met the inclusion criteria; 8 observational studies and 17 randomized control trials. We detected no difference in clinical success comparing new combination antibiotics with standard therapies for all included organisms (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96–1.51). We detected a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies I(2) = 56%. Studies that focused on patients with CRE or MDRPA infections demonstrated a strong association between treatment with new combination antibiotics and clinical success (pooled OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.60–3.57). CONCLUSIONS: C/T, C/A, I/R, and M/V are not inferior to standard therapies for treating various complicated infections, but they may have greater clinical success for treating MDRPA and CRE infections. More studies that evaluate the use of these antibiotics for drug-resistant infections are needed to determine their effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9495535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94955352022-09-26 Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis Wilson, Geneva M. Fitzpatrick, Margaret A. Walding, Kyle Gonzalez, Beverly Schweizer, Marin L. Suda, Katie J. Evans, Charlesnika T. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and/or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA). OBJECTIVE: We compared the pooled clinical success of these medications to older therapies. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for C/A, C/T, I/R, and M/V studies. The main outcome was clinical success, which was assessed using random-effects models. Stratified analyses were conducted for study drug, sample size, quality, infection source, study design, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRGNO) population. Microbiological success and 28- and 30-day mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined using I(2) values. RESULTS: Overall, 25 articles met the inclusion criteria; 8 observational studies and 17 randomized control trials. We detected no difference in clinical success comparing new combination antibiotics with standard therapies for all included organisms (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96–1.51). We detected a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies I(2) = 56%. Studies that focused on patients with CRE or MDRPA infections demonstrated a strong association between treatment with new combination antibiotics and clinical success (pooled OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.60–3.57). CONCLUSIONS: C/T, C/A, I/R, and M/V are not inferior to standard therapies for treating various complicated infections, but they may have greater clinical success for treating MDRPA and CRE infections. More studies that evaluate the use of these antibiotics for drug-resistant infections are needed to determine their effectiveness. Cambridge University Press 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9495535/ /pubmed/36168482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wilson, Geneva M.
Fitzpatrick, Margaret A.
Walding, Kyle
Gonzalez, Beverly
Schweizer, Marin L.
Suda, Katie J.
Evans, Charlesnika T.
Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_short Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
title_sort evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36168482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.217
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsongenevam evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT fitzpatrickmargareta evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT waldingkyle evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT gonzalezbeverly evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT schweizermarinl evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT sudakatiej evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT evanscharlesnikat evaluatingtheclinicaleffectivenessofnewbetalactambetalactamaseinhibitorcombinationantibioticsasystematicliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis