Cargando…
Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly applied to prognostic prediction for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with endovascular thrombectomy. This systematic review aims to summarize ML-based pre-thrombectomy prognostic models for LVO stroke and id...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.945813 |
_version_ | 1784794061134102528 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Minyan Oakden-Rayner, Lauren Bird, Alix Smith, Luke Wu, Zimu Scroop, Rebecca Kleinig, Timothy Jannes, Jim Jenkinson, Mark Palmer, Lyle J. |
author_facet | Zeng, Minyan Oakden-Rayner, Lauren Bird, Alix Smith, Luke Wu, Zimu Scroop, Rebecca Kleinig, Timothy Jannes, Jim Jenkinson, Mark Palmer, Lyle J. |
author_sort | Zeng, Minyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly applied to prognostic prediction for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with endovascular thrombectomy. This systematic review aims to summarize ML-based pre-thrombectomy prognostic models for LVO stroke and identify key research gaps. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Meta-analyses of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of ML models were conducted to synthesize model performance. RESULTS: Sixteen studies describing 19 models were eligible. The predicted outcomes include functional outcome at 90 days, successful reperfusion, and hemorrhagic transformation. Functional outcome was analyzed by 10 conventional ML models (pooled AUC=0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.85, AUC range: 0.68–0.93) and four deep learning (DL) models (pooled AUC=0.75, 95% CI: 0.70–0.81, AUC range: 0.71–0.81). Successful reperfusion was analyzed by three conventional ML models (pooled AUC=0.72, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88, AUC range: 0.55–0.88) and one DL model (AUC=0.65, 95% CI: 0.62–0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ML and DL models have shown variable performance in predicting post-treatment outcomes of LVO without generally demonstrating superiority compared to existing prognostic scores. Most models were developed using small datasets, lacked solid external validation, and at high risk of potential bias. There is considerable scope to improve study design and model performance. The application of ML and DL methods to improve the prediction of prognosis in LVO stroke, while promising, remains nascent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021266524, identifier CRD42021266524 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9495610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94956102022-09-23 Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zeng, Minyan Oakden-Rayner, Lauren Bird, Alix Smith, Luke Wu, Zimu Scroop, Rebecca Kleinig, Timothy Jannes, Jim Jenkinson, Mark Palmer, Lyle J. Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) methods are being increasingly applied to prognostic prediction for stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with endovascular thrombectomy. This systematic review aims to summarize ML-based pre-thrombectomy prognostic models for LVO stroke and identify key research gaps. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Meta-analyses of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of ML models were conducted to synthesize model performance. RESULTS: Sixteen studies describing 19 models were eligible. The predicted outcomes include functional outcome at 90 days, successful reperfusion, and hemorrhagic transformation. Functional outcome was analyzed by 10 conventional ML models (pooled AUC=0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.85, AUC range: 0.68–0.93) and four deep learning (DL) models (pooled AUC=0.75, 95% CI: 0.70–0.81, AUC range: 0.71–0.81). Successful reperfusion was analyzed by three conventional ML models (pooled AUC=0.72, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88, AUC range: 0.55–0.88) and one DL model (AUC=0.65, 95% CI: 0.62–0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional ML and DL models have shown variable performance in predicting post-treatment outcomes of LVO without generally demonstrating superiority compared to existing prognostic scores. Most models were developed using small datasets, lacked solid external validation, and at high risk of potential bias. There is considerable scope to improve study design and model performance. The application of ML and DL methods to improve the prediction of prognosis in LVO stroke, while promising, remains nascent. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021266524, identifier CRD42021266524 Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9495610/ /pubmed/36158960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.945813 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zeng, Oakden-Rayner, Bird, Smith, Wu, Scroop, Kleinig, Jannes, Jenkinson and Palmer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Zeng, Minyan Oakden-Rayner, Lauren Bird, Alix Smith, Luke Wu, Zimu Scroop, Rebecca Kleinig, Timothy Jannes, Jim Jenkinson, Mark Palmer, Lyle J. Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.945813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengminyan prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT oakdenraynerlauren prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT birdalix prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT smithluke prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuzimu prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT scrooprebecca prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kleinigtimothy prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jannesjim prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jenkinsonmark prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT palmerlylej prethrombectomyprognosticpredictionoflargevesselischemicstrokeusingmachinelearningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |