Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis

Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Haowen, Liu, Yang, Han, Qing, Zhang, Aobo, Chen, Hao, Qu, Yang, Wang, Jincheng, Zhao, Jianwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917
_version_ 1784794061603864576
author Dai, Haowen
Liu, Yang
Han, Qing
Zhang, Aobo
Chen, Hao
Qu, Yang
Wang, Jincheng
Zhao, Jianwu
author_facet Dai, Haowen
Liu, Yang
Han, Qing
Zhang, Aobo
Chen, Hao
Qu, Yang
Wang, Jincheng
Zhao, Jianwu
author_sort Dai, Haowen
collection PubMed
description Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was developed in recent years and has been widely used in clinical practice to treat OVCF. Are the clinical effects of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (BPVP) the same? The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical differences between UPVP and BPVP using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: The heterogeneous assignment finite element (FE) model of T11-L1 was constructed and validated. A compression fracture of the vertebral body was performed at T12. UPVP and BPVP were simulated by the difference in the distribution of bone cement in T12. Stress distributions and maximum von Mises stresses of vertebrae and intervertebral discs were compared. The rate of change of maximum displacement between UPVP and BPVP was evaluated. Results: There were no obvious high-stress concentration regions on the anterior and middle columns of the T12 vertebral body in BPVP. Compared with UPVP, the maximum stress on T11 in BPVP was lower under left/right lateral bending, and the maximum stress on L1 was lower under all loading conditions. For the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, the maximum stress of BPVP was less than that of UPVP. The maximum displacement of T12 after BPVP was less than that after UPVP under the six loading conditions. Conclusion: BPVP could balance the stress of the vertebral body, reduce the maximum stress of the intervertebral disc, and offer advantages in terms of stability compared with UPVP. In summary, BPVP could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and provide promising clinical effects for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9495612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94956122022-09-23 Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis Dai, Haowen Liu, Yang Han, Qing Zhang, Aobo Chen, Hao Qu, Yang Wang, Jincheng Zhao, Jianwu Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was developed in recent years and has been widely used in clinical practice to treat OVCF. Are the clinical effects of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (BPVP) the same? The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical differences between UPVP and BPVP using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: The heterogeneous assignment finite element (FE) model of T11-L1 was constructed and validated. A compression fracture of the vertebral body was performed at T12. UPVP and BPVP were simulated by the difference in the distribution of bone cement in T12. Stress distributions and maximum von Mises stresses of vertebrae and intervertebral discs were compared. The rate of change of maximum displacement between UPVP and BPVP was evaluated. Results: There were no obvious high-stress concentration regions on the anterior and middle columns of the T12 vertebral body in BPVP. Compared with UPVP, the maximum stress on T11 in BPVP was lower under left/right lateral bending, and the maximum stress on L1 was lower under all loading conditions. For the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, the maximum stress of BPVP was less than that of UPVP. The maximum displacement of T12 after BPVP was less than that after UPVP under the six loading conditions. Conclusion: BPVP could balance the stress of the vertebral body, reduce the maximum stress of the intervertebral disc, and offer advantages in terms of stability compared with UPVP. In summary, BPVP could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and provide promising clinical effects for patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9495612/ /pubmed/36159704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dai, Liu, Han, Zhang, Chen, Qu, Wang and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Dai, Haowen
Liu, Yang
Han, Qing
Zhang, Aobo
Chen, Hao
Qu, Yang
Wang, Jincheng
Zhao, Jianwu
Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a finite element analysis
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9495612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.978917
work_keys_str_mv AT daihaowen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT liuyang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT hanqing biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangaobo biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT chenhao biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT quyang biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangjincheng biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhaojianwu biomechanicalcomparisonbetweenunilateralandbilateralpercutaneousvertebroplastyforosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesafiniteelementanalysis