Cargando…

DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures

BACKGROUND: Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI‐plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR‐FLASH score (score based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Taiki, Sotomi, Yohei, Hikoso, Shungo, Nakatani, Daisaku, Mizuno, Hiroya, Okada, Katsuki, Dohi, Tomoharu, Kitamura, Tetsuhisa, Sunaga, Akihiro, Kida, Hirota, Oeun, Bolrathanak, Egami, Yasuyuki, Watanabe, Tetsuya, Minamiguchi, Hitoshi, Miyoshi, Miwa, Tanaka, Nobuaki, Oka, Takafumi, Okada, Masato, Kanda, Takashi, Matsuda, Yasuhiro, Kawasaki, Masato, Masuda, Masaharu, Inoue, Koichi, Sakata, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35929474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024916
_version_ 1784794235113832448
author Sato, Taiki
Sotomi, Yohei
Hikoso, Shungo
Nakatani, Daisaku
Mizuno, Hiroya
Okada, Katsuki
Dohi, Tomoharu
Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
Sunaga, Akihiro
Kida, Hirota
Oeun, Bolrathanak
Egami, Yasuyuki
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Minamiguchi, Hitoshi
Miyoshi, Miwa
Tanaka, Nobuaki
Oka, Takafumi
Okada, Masato
Kanda, Takashi
Matsuda, Yasuhiro
Kawasaki, Masato
Masuda, Masaharu
Inoue, Koichi
Sakata, Yasushi
author_facet Sato, Taiki
Sotomi, Yohei
Hikoso, Shungo
Nakatani, Daisaku
Mizuno, Hiroya
Okada, Katsuki
Dohi, Tomoharu
Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
Sunaga, Akihiro
Kida, Hirota
Oeun, Bolrathanak
Egami, Yasuyuki
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Minamiguchi, Hitoshi
Miyoshi, Miwa
Tanaka, Nobuaki
Oka, Takafumi
Okada, Masato
Kanda, Takashi
Matsuda, Yasuhiro
Kawasaki, Masato
Masuda, Masaharu
Inoue, Koichi
Sakata, Yasushi
author_sort Sato, Taiki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI‐plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR‐FLASH score (score based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of atrial fibrillation, left atrialdiameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension) is reportedly useful for identifying patients with arrhythmogenic substrates. We hypothesized that, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the DR‐FLASH score can be used to classify patients into those who require PVI‐plus and those for whom a PVI‐only strategy is sufficient. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a post hoc subanalysis of the a multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation alone for recurrence prevention compared with extensive ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (EARNEST‐PVI trial). This analysis focuses on the relationship between DR‐FLASH score and the efficacy of different ablation strategies. We divided the population into 2 groups based on a DR‐FLASH score of 3 points. A total of 469 patients were analyzed. Among those with a DR‐FLASH score >3 (N=279), the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in the PVI‐plus arm than in the PVI‐only arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28–0.72]; P<0.001). In contrast, among patients with a DR‐FLASH score ≤3 (N=217), no differences were observed in the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence between the PVI‐only arm and the PVI‐plus arm (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.61–1.89]; P=0.795). There was significant interaction between patients with a DR‐FLASH score >3 and DR‐FLASH score ≤3 (P value for interaction=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The DR‐FLASH score is a useful tool for deciding the catheter ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9496301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94963012022-09-30 DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures Sato, Taiki Sotomi, Yohei Hikoso, Shungo Nakatani, Daisaku Mizuno, Hiroya Okada, Katsuki Dohi, Tomoharu Kitamura, Tetsuhisa Sunaga, Akihiro Kida, Hirota Oeun, Bolrathanak Egami, Yasuyuki Watanabe, Tetsuya Minamiguchi, Hitoshi Miyoshi, Miwa Tanaka, Nobuaki Oka, Takafumi Okada, Masato Kanda, Takashi Matsuda, Yasuhiro Kawasaki, Masato Masuda, Masaharu Inoue, Koichi Sakata, Yasushi J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI‐plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR‐FLASH score (score based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of atrial fibrillation, left atrialdiameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension) is reportedly useful for identifying patients with arrhythmogenic substrates. We hypothesized that, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the DR‐FLASH score can be used to classify patients into those who require PVI‐plus and those for whom a PVI‐only strategy is sufficient. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is a post hoc subanalysis of the a multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation alone for recurrence prevention compared with extensive ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (EARNEST‐PVI trial). This analysis focuses on the relationship between DR‐FLASH score and the efficacy of different ablation strategies. We divided the population into 2 groups based on a DR‐FLASH score of 3 points. A total of 469 patients were analyzed. Among those with a DR‐FLASH score >3 (N=279), the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in the PVI‐plus arm than in the PVI‐only arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28–0.72]; P<0.001). In contrast, among patients with a DR‐FLASH score ≤3 (N=217), no differences were observed in the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence between the PVI‐only arm and the PVI‐plus arm (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.61–1.89]; P=0.795). There was significant interaction between patients with a DR‐FLASH score >3 and DR‐FLASH score ≤3 (P value for interaction=0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The DR‐FLASH score is a useful tool for deciding the catheter ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9496301/ /pubmed/35929474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024916 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sato, Taiki
Sotomi, Yohei
Hikoso, Shungo
Nakatani, Daisaku
Mizuno, Hiroya
Okada, Katsuki
Dohi, Tomoharu
Kitamura, Tetsuhisa
Sunaga, Akihiro
Kida, Hirota
Oeun, Bolrathanak
Egami, Yasuyuki
Watanabe, Tetsuya
Minamiguchi, Hitoshi
Miyoshi, Miwa
Tanaka, Nobuaki
Oka, Takafumi
Okada, Masato
Kanda, Takashi
Matsuda, Yasuhiro
Kawasaki, Masato
Masuda, Masaharu
Inoue, Koichi
Sakata, Yasushi
DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title_full DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title_fullStr DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title_full_unstemmed DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title_short DR‐FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures
title_sort dr‐flash score is useful for identifying patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who require extensive catheter ablation procedures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35929474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024916
work_keys_str_mv AT satotaiki drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT sotomiyohei drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT hikososhungo drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT nakatanidaisaku drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT mizunohiroya drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT okadakatsuki drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT dohitomoharu drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT kitamuratetsuhisa drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT sunagaakihiro drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT kidahirota drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT oeunbolrathanak drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT egamiyasuyuki drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT watanabetetsuya drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT minamiguchihitoshi drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT miyoshimiwa drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT tanakanobuaki drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT okatakafumi drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT okadamasato drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT kandatakashi drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT matsudayasuhiro drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT kawasakimasato drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT masudamasaharu drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT inouekoichi drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT sakatayasushi drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures
AT drflashscoreisusefulforidentifyingpatientswithpersistentatrialfibrillationwhorequireextensivecatheterablationprocedures