Local Backbone Geometry Plays a Critical Role in Determining Conformational Preferences of Amino Acid Residues in Proteins

The definition of the structural basis of the conformational preferences of the genetically encoded amino acid residues is an important yet unresolved issue of structural biology. In order to gain insights into this intricate topic, we here determined and compared the amino acid propensity scales for different (φ, ψ) regions of the Ramachandran plot and for different secondary structure elements. These propensities were calculated using the Chou–Fasman approach on a database of non-redundant protein chains retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. Similarities between propensity scales were evaluated by linear regression analyses. One of the most striking and unexpected findings is that distant regions of the Ramachandran plot may exhibit significantly similar propensity scales. On the other hand, contiguous regions of the Ramachandran plot may present anticorrelated propensities. In order to provide an interpretative background to these results, we evaluated the role that the local variability of protein backbone geometry plays in this context. Our analysis indicates that (dis)similarities of propensity scales between different regions of the Ramachandran plot are coupled with (dis)similarities in the local geometry. The concept that similarities of the propensity scales are dictated by the similarity of the NC(α)C angle and not necessarily by the similarity of the (φ, ψ) conformation may have far-reaching implications in the field.