Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459 |
_version_ | 1784794266343571456 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed, Mohamed O. Lamellas, Pablo Roguin, Ariel Oemrawsingh, Rohit M. Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J. Routledge, Helen van Leeuwen, Frank Debrus, Roxane Roffi, Marco Mamas, Mamas A. |
author_facet | Mohamed, Mohamed O. Lamellas, Pablo Roguin, Ariel Oemrawsingh, Rohit M. Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J. Routledge, Helen van Leeuwen, Frank Debrus, Roxane Roffi, Marco Mamas, Mamas A. |
author_sort | Mohamed, Mohamed O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL percutaneous coronary intervention procedures from the prospective e‐Ultimaster (Prospective, Single‐Arm, Multi Centre Observations Ultimaster Des Registry) multicenter international registry were analyzed according to CBL distribution as defined by the Medina classification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome, 1‐year target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization), and its individual components between Medina subtypes using Medina 1.0.0 as the reference category. A total of 4003 CBL procedures were included. The most prevalent Medina subtypes were 1.1.1 (35.5%) and 1.1.0 (26.8%), whereas the least prevalent was 0.0.1 (3.5%). Overall, there were no significant differences in patient and procedural characteristics among Medina subtypes. Only Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes were associated with increased target lesion failure (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.3–5.5] and HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6–9.0], respectively) at 1 year, compared with Medina 1.0.0, prompted by clinically driven target lesion revascularization (HR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.1–8.6] and HR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.3–16.0], respectively) as well as cardiac death in Medina 0.0.1 (HR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.0–21.6]). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed between Medina subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter registry analysis of coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, we demonstrate prognostic differences in 1‐year outcomes between different CBL distributions, with Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9496427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94964272022-09-30 Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification Mohamed, Mohamed O. Lamellas, Pablo Roguin, Ariel Oemrawsingh, Rohit M. Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J. Routledge, Helen van Leeuwen, Frank Debrus, Roxane Roffi, Marco Mamas, Mamas A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL percutaneous coronary intervention procedures from the prospective e‐Ultimaster (Prospective, Single‐Arm, Multi Centre Observations Ultimaster Des Registry) multicenter international registry were analyzed according to CBL distribution as defined by the Medina classification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome, 1‐year target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization), and its individual components between Medina subtypes using Medina 1.0.0 as the reference category. A total of 4003 CBL procedures were included. The most prevalent Medina subtypes were 1.1.1 (35.5%) and 1.1.0 (26.8%), whereas the least prevalent was 0.0.1 (3.5%). Overall, there were no significant differences in patient and procedural characteristics among Medina subtypes. Only Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes were associated with increased target lesion failure (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.3–5.5] and HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6–9.0], respectively) at 1 year, compared with Medina 1.0.0, prompted by clinically driven target lesion revascularization (HR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.1–8.6] and HR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.3–16.0], respectively) as well as cardiac death in Medina 0.0.1 (HR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.0–21.6]). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed between Medina subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter registry analysis of coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, we demonstrate prognostic differences in 1‐year outcomes between different CBL distributions, with Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9496427/ /pubmed/36000428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459 Text en © 2022 The Authors and Terumo Europe. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mohamed, Mohamed O. Lamellas, Pablo Roguin, Ariel Oemrawsingh, Rohit M. Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J. Routledge, Helen van Leeuwen, Frank Debrus, Roxane Roffi, Marco Mamas, Mamas A. Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions according to medina classification |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedmohamedo clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT lamellaspablo clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT roguinariel clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT oemrawsinghrohitm clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT ijsselmuidenalexanderjj clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT routledgehelen clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT vanleeuwenfrank clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT debrusroxane clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT roffimarco clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT mamasmamasa clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification AT clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification |