Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification

BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed, Mohamed O., Lamellas, Pablo, Roguin, Ariel, Oemrawsingh, Rohit M., Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J., Routledge, Helen, van Leeuwen, Frank, Debrus, Roxane, Roffi, Marco, Mamas, Mamas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459
_version_ 1784794266343571456
author Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Lamellas, Pablo
Roguin, Ariel
Oemrawsingh, Rohit M.
Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J.
Routledge, Helen
van Leeuwen, Frank
Debrus, Roxane
Roffi, Marco
Mamas, Mamas A.
author_facet Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Lamellas, Pablo
Roguin, Ariel
Oemrawsingh, Rohit M.
Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J.
Routledge, Helen
van Leeuwen, Frank
Debrus, Roxane
Roffi, Marco
Mamas, Mamas A.
author_sort Mohamed, Mohamed O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL percutaneous coronary intervention procedures from the prospective e‐Ultimaster (Prospective, Single‐Arm, Multi Centre Observations Ultimaster Des Registry) multicenter international registry were analyzed according to CBL distribution as defined by the Medina classification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome, 1‐year target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization), and its individual components between Medina subtypes using Medina 1.0.0 as the reference category. A total of 4003 CBL procedures were included. The most prevalent Medina subtypes were 1.1.1 (35.5%) and 1.1.0 (26.8%), whereas the least prevalent was 0.0.1 (3.5%). Overall, there were no significant differences in patient and procedural characteristics among Medina subtypes. Only Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes were associated with increased target lesion failure (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.3–5.5] and HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6–9.0], respectively) at 1 year, compared with Medina 1.0.0, prompted by clinically driven target lesion revascularization (HR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.1–8.6] and HR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.3–16.0], respectively) as well as cardiac death in Medina 0.0.1 (HR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.0–21.6]). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed between Medina subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter registry analysis of coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, we demonstrate prognostic differences in 1‐year outcomes between different CBL distributions, with Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9496427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94964272022-09-30 Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification Mohamed, Mohamed O. Lamellas, Pablo Roguin, Ariel Oemrawsingh, Rohit M. Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J. Routledge, Helen van Leeuwen, Frank Debrus, Roxane Roffi, Marco Mamas, Mamas A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and are associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, there are limited data around the prognostic impact of different CBL distributions. METHODS AND RESULTS: All CBL percutaneous coronary intervention procedures from the prospective e‐Ultimaster (Prospective, Single‐Arm, Multi Centre Observations Ultimaster Des Registry) multicenter international registry were analyzed according to CBL distribution as defined by the Medina classification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the hazard ratio (HR) of the primary outcome, 1‐year target lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target vessel–related myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization), and its individual components between Medina subtypes using Medina 1.0.0 as the reference category. A total of 4003 CBL procedures were included. The most prevalent Medina subtypes were 1.1.1 (35.5%) and 1.1.0 (26.8%), whereas the least prevalent was 0.0.1 (3.5%). Overall, there were no significant differences in patient and procedural characteristics among Medina subtypes. Only Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes were associated with increased target lesion failure (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.3–5.5] and HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6–9.0], respectively) at 1 year, compared with Medina 1.0.0, prompted by clinically driven target lesion revascularization (HR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.1–8.6] and HR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.3–16.0], respectively) as well as cardiac death in Medina 0.0.1 (HR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.0–21.6]). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed between Medina subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: In a large multicenter registry analysis of coronary bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, we demonstrate prognostic differences in 1‐year outcomes between different CBL distributions, with Medina 1.1.1 and 0.0.1 subtypes associated with an increased risk of target lesion failure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9496427/ /pubmed/36000428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459 Text en © 2022 The Authors and Terumo Europe. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mohamed, Mohamed O.
Lamellas, Pablo
Roguin, Ariel
Oemrawsingh, Rohit M.
Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J. J.
Routledge, Helen
van Leeuwen, Frank
Debrus, Roxane
Roffi, Marco
Mamas, Mamas A.
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification
title_sort clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation lesions according to medina classification
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36000428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025459
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmohamedo clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT lamellaspablo clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT roguinariel clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT oemrawsinghrohitm clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT ijsselmuidenalexanderjj clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT routledgehelen clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT vanleeuwenfrank clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT debrusroxane clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT roffimarco clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT mamasmamasa clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification
AT clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforbifurcationlesionsaccordingtomedinaclassification