Cargando…

Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butt, Muhammad Umer, Okumus, Nazli, Jabri, Ahmad, Thomas, Charles, Tarabichi, Yasir, Karim, Saima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023333
_version_ 1784794271400853504
author Butt, Muhammad Umer
Okumus, Nazli
Jabri, Ahmad
Thomas, Charles
Tarabichi, Yasir
Karim, Saima
author_facet Butt, Muhammad Umer
Okumus, Nazli
Jabri, Ahmad
Thomas, Charles
Tarabichi, Yasir
Karim, Saima
author_sort Butt, Muhammad Umer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of 66,  595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85–1.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.70]).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9496447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94964472022-09-30 Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction Butt, Muhammad Umer Okumus, Nazli Jabri, Ahmad Thomas, Charles Tarabichi, Yasir Karim, Saima J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with anatomical and electrical remodeling. Some patients with AF have concomitant sick sinus syndrome and may need permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Association between catheter ablation of AF timing and need for PPM in sick sinus syndrome has not been assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used pooled electronic health data to perform retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of 66,  595 patients with AF and sick sinus syndrome to assess the need of PPM implantation temporally, with AF performed divided into earlier within 5 years (group 1), 5 to 10 years (group 2), or beyond 10 years (group 3) of diagnosis. PPM implantation was lowest among those who had catheter ablation within 5 years of sick sinus syndrome diagnosis: group 1 versus group 2 (18.15% versus 27.21%) and group 1 versus group 3 (18.15% versus 27.22%). Interestingly, there was no difference in risk of PPM between group 2 and group 3 (27.21% versus 27.22%; odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.85–1.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Even after controlling known risk factors that increase the need for pacemaker implantation, timing of AF ablation was the strongest predictor for need for PPM. Patients adjusted OR of PPM was lower if patients had catheter ablation within 5 years of diagnosis compared with later than 5 years (adjusted OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.70]). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9496447/ /pubmed/35535620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023333 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Butt, Muhammad Umer
Okumus, Nazli
Jabri, Ahmad
Thomas, Charles
Tarabichi, Yasir
Karim, Saima
Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title_full Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title_fullStr Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title_short Early Versus Late Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Underlying Sinus Node Dysfunction
title_sort early versus late catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and risk of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with underlying sinus node dysfunction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35535620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.023333
work_keys_str_mv AT buttmuhammadumer earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction
AT okumusnazli earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction
AT jabriahmad earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction
AT thomascharles earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction
AT tarabichiyasir earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction
AT karimsaima earlyversuslatecatheterablationofatrialfibrillationandriskofpermanentpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithunderlyingsinusnodedysfunction