Cargando…

COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?

A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive proces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santoyo-Mora, Mauro, Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos, Cardona-Torres, Luz M., Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J., Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I., Padilla-Medina, José A., Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258
_version_ 1784794374359482368
author Santoyo-Mora, Mauro
Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos
Cardona-Torres, Luz M.
Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J.
Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I.
Padilla-Medina, José A.
Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo
author_facet Santoyo-Mora, Mauro
Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos
Cardona-Torres, Luz M.
Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J.
Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I.
Padilla-Medina, José A.
Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo
author_sort Santoyo-Mora, Mauro
collection PubMed
description A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive processes of decision-making, visual attention, and information processing speed. The population under study consisted of 147 individuals, 38 controls, and 109 post-COVID patients. During the 2AFC test, an Emotiv EPOC+(®) headset was used to obtain EEG signals to evaluate their Focus, Interest, and Engagement metrics. Results indicate that compared to healthy patients or recovered patients from mild-moderate COVID-19 infection, patients who recovered from a severe-critical COVID infection showed a poor performance in different cognitive tests: decision-making tasks required higher visual sensitivity (p = 0.002), Focus (p = 0.01) and information processing speed (p < 0.001). These results signal that the damage caused by the coronavirus on the central nervous and visual systems significantly reduces the cognitive processes capabilities, resulting in a prevalent deficit of 42.42% in information processing speed for mild-moderate cases, 46.15% for decision-making based on visual sensitivity, and 62.16% in information processing speed for severe-critical cases. A psychological follow-up for patients recovering from COVID-19 is recommended based on our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9496861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94968612022-09-23 COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? Santoyo-Mora, Mauro Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos Cardona-Torres, Luz M. Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J. Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I. Padilla-Medina, José A. Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo Brain Sci Article A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive processes of decision-making, visual attention, and information processing speed. The population under study consisted of 147 individuals, 38 controls, and 109 post-COVID patients. During the 2AFC test, an Emotiv EPOC+(®) headset was used to obtain EEG signals to evaluate their Focus, Interest, and Engagement metrics. Results indicate that compared to healthy patients or recovered patients from mild-moderate COVID-19 infection, patients who recovered from a severe-critical COVID infection showed a poor performance in different cognitive tests: decision-making tasks required higher visual sensitivity (p = 0.002), Focus (p = 0.01) and information processing speed (p < 0.001). These results signal that the damage caused by the coronavirus on the central nervous and visual systems significantly reduces the cognitive processes capabilities, resulting in a prevalent deficit of 42.42% in information processing speed for mild-moderate cases, 46.15% for decision-making based on visual sensitivity, and 62.16% in information processing speed for severe-critical cases. A psychological follow-up for patients recovering from COVID-19 is recommended based on our findings. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9496861/ /pubmed/36138994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Santoyo-Mora, Mauro
Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos
Cardona-Torres, Luz M.
Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J.
Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I.
Padilla-Medina, José A.
Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo
COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title_full COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title_fullStr COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title_short COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
title_sort covid-19 long-term effects: is there an impact on the simple reaction time and alternative-forced choice on recovered patients?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258
work_keys_str_mv AT santoyomoramauro covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT villasenormoracarlos covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT cardonatorresluzm covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT martineznolascojuanj covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT barrancogutierrezalejandroi covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT padillamedinajosea covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients
AT bravosanchezmicaelgerardo covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients