Cargando…
COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients?
A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive proces...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258 |
_version_ | 1784794374359482368 |
---|---|
author | Santoyo-Mora, Mauro Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos Cardona-Torres, Luz M. Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J. Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I. Padilla-Medina, José A. Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo |
author_facet | Santoyo-Mora, Mauro Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos Cardona-Torres, Luz M. Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J. Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I. Padilla-Medina, José A. Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo |
author_sort | Santoyo-Mora, Mauro |
collection | PubMed |
description | A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive processes of decision-making, visual attention, and information processing speed. The population under study consisted of 147 individuals, 38 controls, and 109 post-COVID patients. During the 2AFC test, an Emotiv EPOC+(®) headset was used to obtain EEG signals to evaluate their Focus, Interest, and Engagement metrics. Results indicate that compared to healthy patients or recovered patients from mild-moderate COVID-19 infection, patients who recovered from a severe-critical COVID infection showed a poor performance in different cognitive tests: decision-making tasks required higher visual sensitivity (p = 0.002), Focus (p = 0.01) and information processing speed (p < 0.001). These results signal that the damage caused by the coronavirus on the central nervous and visual systems significantly reduces the cognitive processes capabilities, resulting in a prevalent deficit of 42.42% in information processing speed for mild-moderate cases, 46.15% for decision-making based on visual sensitivity, and 62.16% in information processing speed for severe-critical cases. A psychological follow-up for patients recovering from COVID-19 is recommended based on our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9496861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94968612022-09-23 COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? Santoyo-Mora, Mauro Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos Cardona-Torres, Luz M. Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J. Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I. Padilla-Medina, José A. Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo Brain Sci Article A comparative single-evaluation cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate cognitive damage in post-COVID-19 patients. The psychophysics tests of Two-Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) and Simple Reaction Time (SRT), under a designed virtual environment, were used to evaluate the cognitive processes of decision-making, visual attention, and information processing speed. The population under study consisted of 147 individuals, 38 controls, and 109 post-COVID patients. During the 2AFC test, an Emotiv EPOC+(®) headset was used to obtain EEG signals to evaluate their Focus, Interest, and Engagement metrics. Results indicate that compared to healthy patients or recovered patients from mild-moderate COVID-19 infection, patients who recovered from a severe-critical COVID infection showed a poor performance in different cognitive tests: decision-making tasks required higher visual sensitivity (p = 0.002), Focus (p = 0.01) and information processing speed (p < 0.001). These results signal that the damage caused by the coronavirus on the central nervous and visual systems significantly reduces the cognitive processes capabilities, resulting in a prevalent deficit of 42.42% in information processing speed for mild-moderate cases, 46.15% for decision-making based on visual sensitivity, and 62.16% in information processing speed for severe-critical cases. A psychological follow-up for patients recovering from COVID-19 is recommended based on our findings. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9496861/ /pubmed/36138994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Santoyo-Mora, Mauro Villaseñor-Mora, Carlos Cardona-Torres, Luz M. Martínez-Nolasco, Juan J. Barranco-Gutiérrez, Alejandro I. Padilla-Medina, José A. Bravo-Sánchez, Micael Gerardo COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title | COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title_full | COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title_short | COVID-19 Long-Term Effects: Is There an Impact on the Simple Reaction Time and Alternative-Forced Choice on Recovered Patients? |
title_sort | covid-19 long-term effects: is there an impact on the simple reaction time and alternative-forced choice on recovered patients? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9496861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santoyomoramauro covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT villasenormoracarlos covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT cardonatorresluzm covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT martineznolascojuanj covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT barrancogutierrezalejandroi covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT padillamedinajosea covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients AT bravosanchezmicaelgerardo covid19longtermeffectsisthereanimpactonthesimplereactiontimeandalternativeforcedchoiceonrecoveredpatients |