Cargando…
Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, sta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506 |
_version_ | 1784794531852451840 |
---|---|
author | Mare, Marzia Memeo, Lorenzo Colarossi, Cristina Giuffrida, Dario |
author_facet | Mare, Marzia Memeo, Lorenzo Colarossi, Cristina Giuffrida, Dario |
author_sort | Mare, Marzia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9497544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94975442022-09-23 Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done Mare, Marzia Memeo, Lorenzo Colarossi, Cristina Giuffrida, Dario Curr Oncol Review In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient. MDPI 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9497544/ /pubmed/36135075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Mare, Marzia Memeo, Lorenzo Colarossi, Cristina Giuffrida, Dario Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title | Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title_full | Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title_fullStr | Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title_full_unstemmed | Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title_short | Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done |
title_sort | third- and late line treatments of metastatic gastric cancer: still more to be done |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maremarzia thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone AT memeolorenzo thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone AT colarossicristina thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone AT giuffridadario thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone |