Cargando…

Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done

In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mare, Marzia, Memeo, Lorenzo, Colarossi, Cristina, Giuffrida, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506
_version_ 1784794531852451840
author Mare, Marzia
Memeo, Lorenzo
Colarossi, Cristina
Giuffrida, Dario
author_facet Mare, Marzia
Memeo, Lorenzo
Colarossi, Cristina
Giuffrida, Dario
author_sort Mare, Marzia
collection PubMed
description In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9497544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94975442022-09-23 Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done Mare, Marzia Memeo, Lorenzo Colarossi, Cristina Giuffrida, Dario Curr Oncol Review In recent years, advances of anticancer and supportive therapies have determined a gradual improvement in survival rates and patients’ general conditions in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC), allowing them to receive further treatments. The choice of treatment is driven by performance status, age, stage of disease, number of metastatic sites and time from the first to third line of treatment. Targets such as microsatellite instability, PD-L1 expression, and HER2 overexpression or amplification may be addressed to personalise treatment and prolong survival. Despite a growing number of third line options that have provided clinicians with greater opportunities to customise treatments, up to date few agents have been demonstrated as effective after two standard lines for mGC; for these reasons, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were all widely investigated in both phase II and phase III studies. Overall, TAS-102, apatinib, regorafenib, nilotinib, trastuzumab, and pembrolizumab were demonstrated to be valid options in the third line scenario for mGC patient refractory to at least two lines of therapy. A multimodal approach based on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted agents, a personalised nutritional programme as well as the research of new predictive biomarkers may pave the way to new strategies to identify the best treatment for each patient. MDPI 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9497544/ /pubmed/36135075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mare, Marzia
Memeo, Lorenzo
Colarossi, Cristina
Giuffrida, Dario
Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title_full Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title_fullStr Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title_full_unstemmed Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title_short Third- and Late Line Treatments of Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Still More to Be Done
title_sort third- and late line treatments of metastatic gastric cancer: still more to be done
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36135075
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29090506
work_keys_str_mv AT maremarzia thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone
AT memeolorenzo thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone
AT colarossicristina thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone
AT giuffridadario thirdandlatelinetreatmentsofmetastaticgastriccancerstillmoretobedone