Cargando…

A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia

(1) Background: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is carried out by anaesthetists to secure the airway promptly in patients who are at risk of aspirating gastric content during induction of anaesthesia. RSI requires variation in the paediatric population. We conducted a survey to investigate current pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, Lloyd, Correia, Michelle, Mogane, Palesa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091416
_version_ 1784794566749061120
author Duncan, Lloyd
Correia, Michelle
Mogane, Palesa
author_facet Duncan, Lloyd
Correia, Michelle
Mogane, Palesa
author_sort Duncan, Lloyd
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is carried out by anaesthetists to secure the airway promptly in patients who are at risk of aspirating gastric content during induction of anaesthesia. RSI requires variation in the paediatric population. We conducted a survey to investigate current practice of paediatric RSI by anaesthetists. (2) Methods: A descriptive, contextual, cross-sectional research design was followed. The study population consisted of all anaesthetists working in the Department of Anaesthesia at the University of the Witwatersrand. Data was collected in the form of a self-administered questionnaire. (3) Results: Of 138 questionnaires that were distributed, 126 were completed. Clinical indication for RSI was predominantly for appendicitis with peritonitis (115/124; 92.7%). Preoxygenation was performed by 95.1% of anaesthetists for children, 87% for infants and 89.4% for neonates. Cricoid pressure was used significantly more in children (56%) than in infants (20.8%) and neonates (10.3%) (p < 0.001). Rocuronium was the paralytic agent of choice in children (42.7%) and infants (38.2%), while cisatracurium was used most frequently in neonates (37.4%). Suxamethonium was used least in neonates. Cuffed ETTs were used most frequently for children (99.2%) and least for neonates (49.6%). Eighty-five percent of anaesthetists omitted cricoid pressure during RSI for pyloromyotomy, for which a controlled RSI was performed more by consultants and senior registrars (p < 0.01). A classic RSI was performed by 53.6% of anaesthetists for laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Consultants and PMOs were more likely to intubate a child for forearm MUA who was starved for 6 h and received opioids (p < 0.05). Controlled RSI with cisatracurium was the technique of choice for Tenkhoff insertion in a child with renal failure. (4) Conclusions: RSI practice for paediatric patients varied widely among anaesthetists. This may be attributed to a combination of anaesthetic experience, training in paediatric anaesthesia, and patient specific factors, along with the individualised clinical scenario’s aspiration risk. A controlled RSI technique appears to be implemented more frequently by anaesthetists with increased experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9497683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94976832022-09-23 A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia Duncan, Lloyd Correia, Michelle Mogane, Palesa Children (Basel) Article (1) Background: Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is carried out by anaesthetists to secure the airway promptly in patients who are at risk of aspirating gastric content during induction of anaesthesia. RSI requires variation in the paediatric population. We conducted a survey to investigate current practice of paediatric RSI by anaesthetists. (2) Methods: A descriptive, contextual, cross-sectional research design was followed. The study population consisted of all anaesthetists working in the Department of Anaesthesia at the University of the Witwatersrand. Data was collected in the form of a self-administered questionnaire. (3) Results: Of 138 questionnaires that were distributed, 126 were completed. Clinical indication for RSI was predominantly for appendicitis with peritonitis (115/124; 92.7%). Preoxygenation was performed by 95.1% of anaesthetists for children, 87% for infants and 89.4% for neonates. Cricoid pressure was used significantly more in children (56%) than in infants (20.8%) and neonates (10.3%) (p < 0.001). Rocuronium was the paralytic agent of choice in children (42.7%) and infants (38.2%), while cisatracurium was used most frequently in neonates (37.4%). Suxamethonium was used least in neonates. Cuffed ETTs were used most frequently for children (99.2%) and least for neonates (49.6%). Eighty-five percent of anaesthetists omitted cricoid pressure during RSI for pyloromyotomy, for which a controlled RSI was performed more by consultants and senior registrars (p < 0.01). A classic RSI was performed by 53.6% of anaesthetists for laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Consultants and PMOs were more likely to intubate a child for forearm MUA who was starved for 6 h and received opioids (p < 0.05). Controlled RSI with cisatracurium was the technique of choice for Tenkhoff insertion in a child with renal failure. (4) Conclusions: RSI practice for paediatric patients varied widely among anaesthetists. This may be attributed to a combination of anaesthetic experience, training in paediatric anaesthesia, and patient specific factors, along with the individualised clinical scenario’s aspiration risk. A controlled RSI technique appears to be implemented more frequently by anaesthetists with increased experience. MDPI 2022-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9497683/ /pubmed/36138726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091416 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Duncan, Lloyd
Correia, Michelle
Mogane, Palesa
A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title_full A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title_fullStr A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title_short A Survey of Paediatric Rapid Sequence Induction in a Department of Anaesthesia
title_sort survey of paediatric rapid sequence induction in a department of anaesthesia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138726
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091416
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanlloyd asurveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia
AT correiamichelle asurveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia
AT moganepalesa asurveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia
AT duncanlloyd surveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia
AT correiamichelle surveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia
AT moganepalesa surveyofpaediatricrapidsequenceinductioninadepartmentofanaesthesia