Cargando…
Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195 |
_version_ | 1784794596164763648 |
---|---|
author | Pirri, Carmelo Pirri, Nina Porzionato, Andrea Boscolo-Berto, Rafael De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla |
author_facet | Pirri, Carmelo Pirri, Nina Porzionato, Andrea Boscolo-Berto, Rafael De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla |
author_sort | Pirri, Carmelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thicknesses in the arm and forearm. The study involved two raters: the first (R1) is an expert in skeletal–muscle US imaging and, in particular, the US assessment of fasciae; the second (R2) is a radiologist resident with 1 year’s experience in skeletal–muscle US imaging. R2, not having specific competence in the US imaging of fasciae, was trained by R1. R1 took US images following the protocol by Pirri et al. 2021, and the US-recorded images were analyzed separately by the two raters in different sessions. Each rater measured both types of fasciae at different regions and levels of the arm and forearm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was excellent for the deep fascia and good and excellent for the superficial fascia according to the different regions/levels (for example for the anterior region of the arm: deep fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81–0.98; superficial fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79–0.88). These findings confirm that US imaging is a reliable and cost-effective tool for evaluating both fasciae, superficial and deep. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9497800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94978002022-09-23 Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb Pirri, Carmelo Pirri, Nina Porzionato, Andrea Boscolo-Berto, Rafael De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Diagnostics (Basel) Article Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thicknesses in the arm and forearm. The study involved two raters: the first (R1) is an expert in skeletal–muscle US imaging and, in particular, the US assessment of fasciae; the second (R2) is a radiologist resident with 1 year’s experience in skeletal–muscle US imaging. R2, not having specific competence in the US imaging of fasciae, was trained by R1. R1 took US images following the protocol by Pirri et al. 2021, and the US-recorded images were analyzed separately by the two raters in different sessions. Each rater measured both types of fasciae at different regions and levels of the arm and forearm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was excellent for the deep fascia and good and excellent for the superficial fascia according to the different regions/levels (for example for the anterior region of the arm: deep fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81–0.98; superficial fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79–0.88). These findings confirm that US imaging is a reliable and cost-effective tool for evaluating both fasciae, superficial and deep. MDPI 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9497800/ /pubmed/36140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pirri, Carmelo Pirri, Nina Porzionato, Andrea Boscolo-Berto, Rafael De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title | Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title_full | Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title_fullStr | Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title_short | Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb |
title_sort | inter- and intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thickness in upper limb |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirricarmelo interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb AT pirrinina interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb AT porzionatoandrea interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb AT boscolobertorafael interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb AT decaroraffaele interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb AT steccocarla interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb |