Cargando…

Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb

Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pirri, Carmelo, Pirri, Nina, Porzionato, Andrea, Boscolo-Berto, Rafael, De Caro, Raffaele, Stecco, Carla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195
_version_ 1784794596164763648
author Pirri, Carmelo
Pirri, Nina
Porzionato, Andrea
Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
author_facet Pirri, Carmelo
Pirri, Nina
Porzionato, Andrea
Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
author_sort Pirri, Carmelo
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thicknesses in the arm and forearm. The study involved two raters: the first (R1) is an expert in skeletal–muscle US imaging and, in particular, the US assessment of fasciae; the second (R2) is a radiologist resident with 1 year’s experience in skeletal–muscle US imaging. R2, not having specific competence in the US imaging of fasciae, was trained by R1. R1 took US images following the protocol by Pirri et al. 2021, and the US-recorded images were analyzed separately by the two raters in different sessions. Each rater measured both types of fasciae at different regions and levels of the arm and forearm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was excellent for the deep fascia and good and excellent for the superficial fascia according to the different regions/levels (for example for the anterior region of the arm: deep fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81–0.98; superficial fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79–0.88). These findings confirm that US imaging is a reliable and cost-effective tool for evaluating both fasciae, superficial and deep.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9497800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94978002022-09-23 Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb Pirri, Carmelo Pirri, Nina Porzionato, Andrea Boscolo-Berto, Rafael De Caro, Raffaele Stecco, Carla Diagnostics (Basel) Article Ultrasound (US) imaging is increasingly the most used tool to measure the thickness of superficial and deep fasciae, but there are still some doubts about its reliability in this type of measurement. The current study sets out to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of US measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thicknesses in the arm and forearm. The study involved two raters: the first (R1) is an expert in skeletal–muscle US imaging and, in particular, the US assessment of fasciae; the second (R2) is a radiologist resident with 1 year’s experience in skeletal–muscle US imaging. R2, not having specific competence in the US imaging of fasciae, was trained by R1. R1 took US images following the protocol by Pirri et al. 2021, and the US-recorded images were analyzed separately by the two raters in different sessions. Each rater measured both types of fasciae at different regions and levels of the arm and forearm. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was excellent for the deep fascia and good and excellent for the superficial fascia according to the different regions/levels (for example for the anterior region of the arm: deep fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.81–0.98; superficial fascia: Ant 1: ICC(2,2) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79–0.88). These findings confirm that US imaging is a reliable and cost-effective tool for evaluating both fasciae, superficial and deep. MDPI 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9497800/ /pubmed/36140596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pirri, Carmelo
Pirri, Nina
Porzionato, Andrea
Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
De Caro, Raffaele
Stecco, Carla
Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title_full Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title_fullStr Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title_short Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Ultrasound Measurements of Superficial and Deep Fasciae Thickness in Upper Limb
title_sort inter- and intra-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep fasciae thickness in upper limb
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9497800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092195
work_keys_str_mv AT pirricarmelo interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb
AT pirrinina interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb
AT porzionatoandrea interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb
AT boscolobertorafael interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb
AT decaroraffaele interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb
AT steccocarla interandintraraterreliabilityofultrasoundmeasurementsofsuperficialanddeepfasciaethicknessinupperlimb