Cargando…
Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a comb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390 |
_version_ | 1784794658684010496 |
---|---|
author | Quinzi, Vincenzo Polizzi, Alessandro Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Santonocito, Simona Conforte, Cristina Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Isola, Gaetano Lo Giudice, Antonino |
author_facet | Quinzi, Vincenzo Polizzi, Alessandro Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Santonocito, Simona Conforte, Cristina Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Isola, Gaetano Lo Giudice, Antonino |
author_sort | Quinzi, Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9498045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94980452022-09-23 Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review Quinzi, Vincenzo Polizzi, Alessandro Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Santonocito, Simona Conforte, Cristina Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Isola, Gaetano Lo Giudice, Antonino Children (Basel) Review The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts. MDPI 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9498045/ /pubmed/36138698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Quinzi, Vincenzo Polizzi, Alessandro Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Santonocito, Simona Conforte, Cristina Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Isola, Gaetano Lo Giudice, Antonino Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title | Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | facial scanning accuracy with stereophotogrammetry and smartphone technology in children: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinzivincenzo facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT polizzialessandro facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT ronsivallevincenzo facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT santonocitosimona facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT confortecristina facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT manentirebeccajewel facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT isolagaetano facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview AT logiudiceantonino facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview |