Cargando…

Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review

The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a comb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinzi, Vincenzo, Polizzi, Alessandro, Ronsivalle, Vincenzo, Santonocito, Simona, Conforte, Cristina, Manenti, Rebecca Jewel, Isola, Gaetano, Lo Giudice, Antonino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390
_version_ 1784794658684010496
author Quinzi, Vincenzo
Polizzi, Alessandro
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Santonocito, Simona
Conforte, Cristina
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Isola, Gaetano
Lo Giudice, Antonino
author_facet Quinzi, Vincenzo
Polizzi, Alessandro
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Santonocito, Simona
Conforte, Cristina
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Isola, Gaetano
Lo Giudice, Antonino
author_sort Quinzi, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9498045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94980452022-09-23 Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review Quinzi, Vincenzo Polizzi, Alessandro Ronsivalle, Vincenzo Santonocito, Simona Conforte, Cristina Manenti, Rebecca Jewel Isola, Gaetano Lo Giudice, Antonino Children (Basel) Review The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts. MDPI 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9498045/ /pubmed/36138698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Quinzi, Vincenzo
Polizzi, Alessandro
Ronsivalle, Vincenzo
Santonocito, Simona
Conforte, Cristina
Manenti, Rebecca Jewel
Isola, Gaetano
Lo Giudice, Antonino
Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title_full Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title_short Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review
title_sort facial scanning accuracy with stereophotogrammetry and smartphone technology in children: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children9091390
work_keys_str_mv AT quinzivincenzo facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT polizzialessandro facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT ronsivallevincenzo facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT santonocitosimona facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT confortecristina facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT manentirebeccajewel facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT isolagaetano facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview
AT logiudiceantonino facialscanningaccuracywithstereophotogrammetryandsmartphonetechnologyinchildrenasystematicreview