Cargando…

Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review

This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of the research performed in the plant-based meat analogues area. Historical, current, and future tendencies are discussed. The paper offers a comprehensive SLR coupled with a bibliometric analysis of the publication from 1972 to Janua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zahari, Izalin, Östbring, Karolina, Purhagen, Jeanette K., Rayner, Marilyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11182870
_version_ 1784794788595236864
author Zahari, Izalin
Östbring, Karolina
Purhagen, Jeanette K.
Rayner, Marilyn
author_facet Zahari, Izalin
Östbring, Karolina
Purhagen, Jeanette K.
Rayner, Marilyn
author_sort Zahari, Izalin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of the research performed in the plant-based meat analogues area. Historical, current, and future tendencies are discussed. The paper offers a comprehensive SLR coupled with a bibliometric analysis of the publication from 1972 to January 2022. The articles were obtained using a research string and precise inclusion and exclusion criteria from two prominent databases, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow technique was used to describe the data screening and selection. In total, 84 publications were selected for further analysis after a thorough literature assessment. From this study, six main themes were identified: (1) objectives of the study; (2) type of plant protein; (3) product type; (4) added ingredients; (5) texturization technique; and (6) quality assessment considered in the studies. Recent trends in publication imply that meat analogue technology is gaining prominence. This review revealed significant research on improving meat analogues via texturization. Even though extrusion is used industrially, the technique is still in its infancy and needs improvement. Future studies should focus more on fiber and protein–protein interactions, macromolecule conformation and mechanisms, diversifying or improving current methods, sensory attributes, and gastrointestinal absorption rate of each novel protein ingredient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9498552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94985522022-09-23 Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review Zahari, Izalin Östbring, Karolina Purhagen, Jeanette K. Rayner, Marilyn Foods Review This study aimed to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of the research performed in the plant-based meat analogues area. Historical, current, and future tendencies are discussed. The paper offers a comprehensive SLR coupled with a bibliometric analysis of the publication from 1972 to January 2022. The articles were obtained using a research string and precise inclusion and exclusion criteria from two prominent databases, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow technique was used to describe the data screening and selection. In total, 84 publications were selected for further analysis after a thorough literature assessment. From this study, six main themes were identified: (1) objectives of the study; (2) type of plant protein; (3) product type; (4) added ingredients; (5) texturization technique; and (6) quality assessment considered in the studies. Recent trends in publication imply that meat analogue technology is gaining prominence. This review revealed significant research on improving meat analogues via texturization. Even though extrusion is used industrially, the technique is still in its infancy and needs improvement. Future studies should focus more on fiber and protein–protein interactions, macromolecule conformation and mechanisms, diversifying or improving current methods, sensory attributes, and gastrointestinal absorption rate of each novel protein ingredient. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9498552/ /pubmed/36140998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11182870 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zahari, Izalin
Östbring, Karolina
Purhagen, Jeanette K.
Rayner, Marilyn
Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Plant-Based Meat Analogues from Alternative Protein: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort plant-based meat analogues from alternative protein: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11182870
work_keys_str_mv AT zahariizalin plantbasedmeatanaloguesfromalternativeproteinasystematicliteraturereview
AT ostbringkarolina plantbasedmeatanaloguesfromalternativeproteinasystematicliteraturereview
AT purhagenjeanettek plantbasedmeatanaloguesfromalternativeproteinasystematicliteraturereview
AT raynermarilyn plantbasedmeatanaloguesfromalternativeproteinasystematicliteraturereview