Cargando…
Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791 |
_version_ | 1784794801729699840 |
---|---|
author | García, Ruben I. Jauregui, Ines del Amo, Cristina Gandiaga, Ainhoa Rodriguez, Olivia Margallo, Leyre Voces, Roberto Martin, Nerea Gallego, Inés Minguez, Rikardo Eguiraun, Harkaitz |
author_facet | García, Ruben I. Jauregui, Ines del Amo, Cristina Gandiaga, Ainhoa Rodriguez, Olivia Margallo, Leyre Voces, Roberto Martin, Nerea Gallego, Inés Minguez, Rikardo Eguiraun, Harkaitz |
author_sort | García, Ruben I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizations. The aim of this study was the evaluation and implementation of a 3D printing technology service in a radiology department. Methods: This work describes a methodology to implement a 3D printing service in a radiology department of a Spanish public hospital, considering leadership, training, workflow, clinical integration, quality processes and usability. Results: The results correspond to a 6-year period, during which we performed up to 352 cases, requested by 85 different clinicians. The training, quality control and processes required for the scaled implementation of an in-house 3D printing service are also reported. Conclusions: Despite the maturity of the technology and its impact on the clinic, it is necessary to establish new workflows to correctly implement them into the strategy of the health organization, adjusting it to the needs of clinicians and to their specific resources. Significance: This work allows hospitals to bridge the gap between research and 3D printing, setting up its transfer to clinical practice and using implementation methodology for decision support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9498605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94986052022-09-23 Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department García, Ruben I. Jauregui, Ines del Amo, Cristina Gandiaga, Ainhoa Rodriguez, Olivia Margallo, Leyre Voces, Roberto Martin, Nerea Gallego, Inés Minguez, Rikardo Eguiraun, Harkaitz Healthcare (Basel) Article Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizations. The aim of this study was the evaluation and implementation of a 3D printing technology service in a radiology department. Methods: This work describes a methodology to implement a 3D printing service in a radiology department of a Spanish public hospital, considering leadership, training, workflow, clinical integration, quality processes and usability. Results: The results correspond to a 6-year period, during which we performed up to 352 cases, requested by 85 different clinicians. The training, quality control and processes required for the scaled implementation of an in-house 3D printing service are also reported. Conclusions: Despite the maturity of the technology and its impact on the clinic, it is necessary to establish new workflows to correctly implement them into the strategy of the health organization, adjusting it to the needs of clinicians and to their specific resources. Significance: This work allows hospitals to bridge the gap between research and 3D printing, setting up its transfer to clinical practice and using implementation methodology for decision support. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9498605/ /pubmed/36141403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García, Ruben I. Jauregui, Ines del Amo, Cristina Gandiaga, Ainhoa Rodriguez, Olivia Margallo, Leyre Voces, Roberto Martin, Nerea Gallego, Inés Minguez, Rikardo Eguiraun, Harkaitz Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title | Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title_full | Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title_fullStr | Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title_short | Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department |
title_sort | implementation of an in-house 3d manufacturing unit in a public hospital’s radiology department |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciarubeni implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT jaureguiines implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT delamocristina implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT gandiagaainhoa implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT rodriguezolivia implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT margalloleyre implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT vocesroberto implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT martinnerea implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT gallegoines implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT minguezrikardo implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment AT eguiraunharkaitz implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment |