Cargando…

Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department

Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García, Ruben I., Jauregui, Ines, del Amo, Cristina, Gandiaga, Ainhoa, Rodriguez, Olivia, Margallo, Leyre, Voces, Roberto, Martin, Nerea, Gallego, Inés, Minguez, Rikardo, Eguiraun, Harkaitz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791
_version_ 1784794801729699840
author García, Ruben I.
Jauregui, Ines
del Amo, Cristina
Gandiaga, Ainhoa
Rodriguez, Olivia
Margallo, Leyre
Voces, Roberto
Martin, Nerea
Gallego, Inés
Minguez, Rikardo
Eguiraun, Harkaitz
author_facet García, Ruben I.
Jauregui, Ines
del Amo, Cristina
Gandiaga, Ainhoa
Rodriguez, Olivia
Margallo, Leyre
Voces, Roberto
Martin, Nerea
Gallego, Inés
Minguez, Rikardo
Eguiraun, Harkaitz
author_sort García, Ruben I.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizations. The aim of this study was the evaluation and implementation of a 3D printing technology service in a radiology department. Methods: This work describes a methodology to implement a 3D printing service in a radiology department of a Spanish public hospital, considering leadership, training, workflow, clinical integration, quality processes and usability. Results: The results correspond to a 6-year period, during which we performed up to 352 cases, requested by 85 different clinicians. The training, quality control and processes required for the scaled implementation of an in-house 3D printing service are also reported. Conclusions: Despite the maturity of the technology and its impact on the clinic, it is necessary to establish new workflows to correctly implement them into the strategy of the health organization, adjusting it to the needs of clinicians and to their specific resources. Significance: This work allows hospitals to bridge the gap between research and 3D printing, setting up its transfer to clinical practice and using implementation methodology for decision support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9498605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94986052022-09-23 Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department García, Ruben I. Jauregui, Ines del Amo, Cristina Gandiaga, Ainhoa Rodriguez, Olivia Margallo, Leyre Voces, Roberto Martin, Nerea Gallego, Inés Minguez, Rikardo Eguiraun, Harkaitz Healthcare (Basel) Article Objective: Three-dimensional printing has become a leading manufacturing technique in healthcare in recent years. Doubts in published studies regarding the methodological rigor and cost-effectiveness and stricter regulations have stopped the transfer of this technology in many healthcare organizations. The aim of this study was the evaluation and implementation of a 3D printing technology service in a radiology department. Methods: This work describes a methodology to implement a 3D printing service in a radiology department of a Spanish public hospital, considering leadership, training, workflow, clinical integration, quality processes and usability. Results: The results correspond to a 6-year period, during which we performed up to 352 cases, requested by 85 different clinicians. The training, quality control and processes required for the scaled implementation of an in-house 3D printing service are also reported. Conclusions: Despite the maturity of the technology and its impact on the clinic, it is necessary to establish new workflows to correctly implement them into the strategy of the health organization, adjusting it to the needs of clinicians and to their specific resources. Significance: This work allows hospitals to bridge the gap between research and 3D printing, setting up its transfer to clinical practice and using implementation methodology for decision support. MDPI 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9498605/ /pubmed/36141403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García, Ruben I.
Jauregui, Ines
del Amo, Cristina
Gandiaga, Ainhoa
Rodriguez, Olivia
Margallo, Leyre
Voces, Roberto
Martin, Nerea
Gallego, Inés
Minguez, Rikardo
Eguiraun, Harkaitz
Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title_full Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title_fullStr Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title_short Implementation of an In-House 3D Manufacturing Unit in a Public Hospital’s Radiology Department
title_sort implementation of an in-house 3d manufacturing unit in a public hospital’s radiology department
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36141403
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091791
work_keys_str_mv AT garciarubeni implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT jaureguiines implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT delamocristina implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT gandiagaainhoa implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT rodriguezolivia implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT margalloleyre implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT vocesroberto implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT martinnerea implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT gallegoines implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT minguezrikardo implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment
AT eguiraunharkaitz implementationofaninhouse3dmanufacturingunitinapublichospitalsradiologydepartment