Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND: The instruments used to assess attitudes to oral health must be validated in order for their results to be reliable and comparable with other variables. The aim of this review was to analyze the ability of self-administered questionnaires to validly and reliably measure attitudes to oral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar, Salas-Huallparimache, Jessica-Margot, Díaz-Pizán, María-Elena, Blanco-Victorio, Daniel-José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59455
_version_ 1784794809249038336
author Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar
Salas-Huallparimache, Jessica-Margot
Díaz-Pizán, María-Elena
Blanco-Victorio, Daniel-José
author_facet Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar
Salas-Huallparimache, Jessica-Margot
Díaz-Pizán, María-Elena
Blanco-Victorio, Daniel-José
author_sort Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The instruments used to assess attitudes to oral health must be validated in order for their results to be reliable and comparable with other variables. The aim of this review was to analyze the ability of self-administered questionnaires to validly and reliably measure attitudes to oral health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A bibliographic review was carried out using the following databases, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science from the year 2016 to 2021, using the keywords: (questionnaire* OR survey*) AND (attitude* OR behav*) AND (“oral health” OR “dental care”) AND (validity OR reliability). RESULTS: A total of 234 original articles were found in the databases, only 22 met the selection criteria, of which 13 were aimed at patients and nine at health professionals. Evidence of validity and reliability was determined using “COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments” (COSMIN). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the articles partially meet the validity and reliability criteria. Key words:Questionnaire, attitude, behavior, oral health, validity and reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9498635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94986352022-09-23 Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar Salas-Huallparimache, Jessica-Margot Díaz-Pizán, María-Elena Blanco-Victorio, Daniel-José J Clin Exp Dent Review BACKGROUND: The instruments used to assess attitudes to oral health must be validated in order for their results to be reliable and comparable with other variables. The aim of this review was to analyze the ability of self-administered questionnaires to validly and reliably measure attitudes to oral health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A bibliographic review was carried out using the following databases, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science from the year 2016 to 2021, using the keywords: (questionnaire* OR survey*) AND (attitude* OR behav*) AND (“oral health” OR “dental care”) AND (validity OR reliability). RESULTS: A total of 234 original articles were found in the databases, only 22 met the selection criteria, of which 13 were aimed at patients and nine at health professionals. Evidence of validity and reliability was determined using “COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments” (COSMIN). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the articles partially meet the validity and reliability criteria. Key words:Questionnaire, attitude, behavior, oral health, validity and reliability. Medicina Oral S.L. 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9498635/ /pubmed/36158779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59455 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ríos-León, Rocío del Pilar
Salas-Huallparimache, Jessica-Margot
Díaz-Pizán, María-Elena
Blanco-Victorio, Daniel-José
Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title_full Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title_short Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature
title_sort validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: a review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59455
work_keys_str_mv AT riosleonrociodelpilar validityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringattitudestooralhealthareviewoftheliterature
AT salashuallparimachejessicamargot validityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringattitudestooralhealthareviewoftheliterature
AT diazpizanmariaelena validityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringattitudestooralhealthareviewoftheliterature
AT blancovictoriodanieljose validityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringattitudestooralhealthareviewoftheliterature