Cargando…

Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation

Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3–5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emms, Alexandra, Castleman, James, Allen, Stephanie, Williams, Denise, Kinning, Esther, Kilby, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13091517
_version_ 1784794856771551232
author Emms, Alexandra
Castleman, James
Allen, Stephanie
Williams, Denise
Kinning, Esther
Kilby, Mark
author_facet Emms, Alexandra
Castleman, James
Allen, Stephanie
Williams, Denise
Kinning, Esther
Kilby, Mark
author_sort Emms, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3–5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the ‘Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes’ (PAGE) study and ‘Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study’ performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively ‘unselected’ congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9498826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94988262022-09-23 Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation Emms, Alexandra Castleman, James Allen, Stephanie Williams, Denise Kinning, Esther Kilby, Mark Genes (Basel) Review Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3–5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the ‘Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes’ (PAGE) study and ‘Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study’ performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively ‘unselected’ congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities. MDPI 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9498826/ /pubmed/36140685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13091517 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Emms, Alexandra
Castleman, James
Allen, Stephanie
Williams, Denise
Kinning, Esther
Kilby, Mark
Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title_full Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title_fullStr Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title_short Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation
title_sort next generation sequencing after invasive prenatal testing in fetuses with congenital malformations: prenatal or neonatal investigation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9498826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36140685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13091517
work_keys_str_mv AT emmsalexandra nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation
AT castlemanjames nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation
AT allenstephanie nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation
AT williamsdenise nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation
AT kinningesther nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation
AT kilbymark nextgenerationsequencingafterinvasiveprenataltestinginfetuseswithcongenitalmalformationsprenatalorneonatalinvestigation