Cargando…

Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION: Lower limb amputations secondary to diabetic foot infection/osteomyelitis (OM) are the most common cause for non-traumatic amputations of the lower extremity. Hind/midfoot amputations are commonly done for metatarsal (MT) OM. They are, however, associated with higher complication and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Amit, Menon, Aditya, Rodrigues, Camilla, Sunavala, Ayesha, Agashe, Vikas M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199924
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i03.2696
_version_ 1784794907154579456
author Gupta, Amit
Menon, Aditya
Rodrigues, Camilla
Sunavala, Ayesha
Agashe, Vikas M
author_facet Gupta, Amit
Menon, Aditya
Rodrigues, Camilla
Sunavala, Ayesha
Agashe, Vikas M
author_sort Gupta, Amit
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lower limb amputations secondary to diabetic foot infection/osteomyelitis (OM) are the most common cause for non-traumatic amputations of the lower extremity. Hind/midfoot amputations are commonly done for metatarsal (MT) OM. They are, however, associated with higher complication and revision rates and often lead to below knee amputation. In comparison, distal/forefoot toe disarticulation/ray amputation (R amp) have lesser revision rates/complications and give better functional outcome. Here, we report a case of 2nd R amp with an uncommon complication. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old male with uncontrolled diabetes and bilateral diabetic neuropathy presented with discharging sinus over plantar aspect of the left foot since 1 week. There was no evidence of underlying OM on MRI. Wound healed with soft-tissue debridement and empirical antibiotics (culture negative) for 2 weeks. Re-debridement was done for a wound gape 6 weeks later. Infection resolved with targeted antibiotics (oral ciprofloxacin and doxycycline) for Enterobacter cloacae given for 1 month. Six months later, he developed pain and swelling in the left foot following prolonged barefoot walking and possible injury with a stone. There was local redness, swelling, and a plantar sinus. MRI revealed septic arthritis of the left 2nd metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, OM of the 2nd MT head, and an encapsulated soft-tissue abscess. Aggressive debridement with 2nd R amp and careful separation of encapsulated abscess was done leaving behind base of 2nd MT to maintain stability of the Lisfranc joint. Wound healed primarily. Targeted antibiotics for Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus were given for 6 weeks. Good diabetic control and avoiding bare foot walking were advised and he is infection free, fully functional, and asymptomatic at 36 months. However, he was noted to have developed valgus deformity of the midfoot secondary to Charcot osteoarthropathy of the Lisfranc joints at 36 months follow-up, involving 1st, 3rd, and 4th TMT joints. The other foot did not show any evidence of Charcot arthropathy. CONCLUSION: Recurrent wound infections with subsequent OM are a common feature of diabetic foot. R amps have better functional outcomes with preserved foot stability, shorter length of hospitalization, and associated costs as compared to hind/midfoot amputations. They may, however, develop Charcot osteoarthropathy due to the void between adjoining MTs resulting in altered forces across the Lisfranc joints. Surgeons must beware of this complication, especially following R amps and monitor these patients with serial clinical and radiographic examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9499047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94990472022-10-04 Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature Gupta, Amit Menon, Aditya Rodrigues, Camilla Sunavala, Ayesha Agashe, Vikas M J Orthop Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Lower limb amputations secondary to diabetic foot infection/osteomyelitis (OM) are the most common cause for non-traumatic amputations of the lower extremity. Hind/midfoot amputations are commonly done for metatarsal (MT) OM. They are, however, associated with higher complication and revision rates and often lead to below knee amputation. In comparison, distal/forefoot toe disarticulation/ray amputation (R amp) have lesser revision rates/complications and give better functional outcome. Here, we report a case of 2nd R amp with an uncommon complication. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old male with uncontrolled diabetes and bilateral diabetic neuropathy presented with discharging sinus over plantar aspect of the left foot since 1 week. There was no evidence of underlying OM on MRI. Wound healed with soft-tissue debridement and empirical antibiotics (culture negative) for 2 weeks. Re-debridement was done for a wound gape 6 weeks later. Infection resolved with targeted antibiotics (oral ciprofloxacin and doxycycline) for Enterobacter cloacae given for 1 month. Six months later, he developed pain and swelling in the left foot following prolonged barefoot walking and possible injury with a stone. There was local redness, swelling, and a plantar sinus. MRI revealed septic arthritis of the left 2nd metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, OM of the 2nd MT head, and an encapsulated soft-tissue abscess. Aggressive debridement with 2nd R amp and careful separation of encapsulated abscess was done leaving behind base of 2nd MT to maintain stability of the Lisfranc joint. Wound healed primarily. Targeted antibiotics for Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus were given for 6 weeks. Good diabetic control and avoiding bare foot walking were advised and he is infection free, fully functional, and asymptomatic at 36 months. However, he was noted to have developed valgus deformity of the midfoot secondary to Charcot osteoarthropathy of the Lisfranc joints at 36 months follow-up, involving 1st, 3rd, and 4th TMT joints. The other foot did not show any evidence of Charcot arthropathy. CONCLUSION: Recurrent wound infections with subsequent OM are a common feature of diabetic foot. R amps have better functional outcomes with preserved foot stability, shorter length of hospitalization, and associated costs as compared to hind/midfoot amputations. They may, however, develop Charcot osteoarthropathy due to the void between adjoining MTs resulting in altered forces across the Lisfranc joints. Surgeons must beware of this complication, especially following R amps and monitor these patients with serial clinical and radiographic examination. Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2022-03 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9499047/ /pubmed/36199924 http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i03.2696 Text en Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Gupta, Amit
Menon, Aditya
Rodrigues, Camilla
Sunavala, Ayesha
Agashe, Vikas M
Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title_full Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title_fullStr Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title_short Second Ray Amputation in Diabetic Foot – Functionally Better than Proximal Foot Amputations, but Beware of Charcot Arthropathy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
title_sort second ray amputation in diabetic foot – functionally better than proximal foot amputations, but beware of charcot arthropathy: a case report and review of literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36199924
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i03.2696
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaamit secondrayamputationindiabeticfootfunctionallybetterthanproximalfootamputationsbutbewareofcharcotarthropathyacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT menonaditya secondrayamputationindiabeticfootfunctionallybetterthanproximalfootamputationsbutbewareofcharcotarthropathyacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT rodriguescamilla secondrayamputationindiabeticfootfunctionallybetterthanproximalfootamputationsbutbewareofcharcotarthropathyacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT sunavalaayesha secondrayamputationindiabeticfootfunctionallybetterthanproximalfootamputationsbutbewareofcharcotarthropathyacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT agashevikasm secondrayamputationindiabeticfootfunctionallybetterthanproximalfootamputationsbutbewareofcharcotarthropathyacasereportandreviewofliterature