Cargando…

The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study

Dry needling (DN) is a standard procedure for treating musculoskeletal disorders. However, there are no clear recommendations for using DN in low back pain (LBP). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the novel DN program for reducing pain intensity and improving functional effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajfur, Joanna, Rajfur, Katarzyna, Kosowski, Łukasz, Walewicz, Karolina, Dymarek, Robert, Ptaszkowski, Kuba, Taradaj, Jakub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19980-1
_version_ 1784795135976931328
author Rajfur, Joanna
Rajfur, Katarzyna
Kosowski, Łukasz
Walewicz, Karolina
Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Taradaj, Jakub
author_facet Rajfur, Joanna
Rajfur, Katarzyna
Kosowski, Łukasz
Walewicz, Karolina
Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Taradaj, Jakub
author_sort Rajfur, Joanna
collection PubMed
description Dry needling (DN) is a standard procedure for treating musculoskeletal disorders. However, there are no clear recommendations for using DN in low back pain (LBP). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the novel DN program for reducing pain intensity and improving functional efficiency in patients with chronic LBP. A group of 40 patients with chronic LBP due to the L5-S1 discopathy were eligible and randomized into experimental (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. The DN program was performed for the experimental group according to the Five Regulatory Systems (FRS) concept. The control group received sham therapy using placebo needles. DN sessions were performed twice a week for 4 weeks. A single needling application lasted 60 min. Both groups received standard treatment and physical exercise of LBP for 1 month. Subjective pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), functional efficiency was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the lower spine range of motion was measured with the Schober test. There were significant differences in pain reduction (VAS) in both groups (p < 0.001). The strongest analgesic effect in the DN group yielded 6.45 points immediately after the therapy, 6.2 points after 1 month, and 6 points after 3 months. The DN group scored higher VAS reduction than the control group (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in the functional state (ODI) in the experimental group (p < 0.001). There was a significant ODI decrease by 18.1 points, after 1 month by 18.9 points, and after 3 months by 17.6 points. No significant differences were found in the control group (p > 0.05). Intergroup differences were observed in the functional efficiency in ODI in all measurement time-points (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in the range of motion (Schober test) in the DN group (main effect: p < 0.001). For all measurements, differences (p < 0.001) were observed in favor of DN compared to the control. In conclusion, DN program according to the FRS concept stands for the novel treatment method supplemented by an exercise program, effectively reducing pain and improving functional efficiency in LBP patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9500077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95000772022-09-24 The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study Rajfur, Joanna Rajfur, Katarzyna Kosowski, Łukasz Walewicz, Karolina Dymarek, Robert Ptaszkowski, Kuba Taradaj, Jakub Sci Rep Article Dry needling (DN) is a standard procedure for treating musculoskeletal disorders. However, there are no clear recommendations for using DN in low back pain (LBP). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the novel DN program for reducing pain intensity and improving functional efficiency in patients with chronic LBP. A group of 40 patients with chronic LBP due to the L5-S1 discopathy were eligible and randomized into experimental (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. The DN program was performed for the experimental group according to the Five Regulatory Systems (FRS) concept. The control group received sham therapy using placebo needles. DN sessions were performed twice a week for 4 weeks. A single needling application lasted 60 min. Both groups received standard treatment and physical exercise of LBP for 1 month. Subjective pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS), functional efficiency was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the lower spine range of motion was measured with the Schober test. There were significant differences in pain reduction (VAS) in both groups (p < 0.001). The strongest analgesic effect in the DN group yielded 6.45 points immediately after the therapy, 6.2 points after 1 month, and 6 points after 3 months. The DN group scored higher VAS reduction than the control group (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in the functional state (ODI) in the experimental group (p < 0.001). There was a significant ODI decrease by 18.1 points, after 1 month by 18.9 points, and after 3 months by 17.6 points. No significant differences were found in the control group (p > 0.05). Intergroup differences were observed in the functional efficiency in ODI in all measurement time-points (p < 0.001). There were significant differences in the range of motion (Schober test) in the DN group (main effect: p < 0.001). For all measurements, differences (p < 0.001) were observed in favor of DN compared to the control. In conclusion, DN program according to the FRS concept stands for the novel treatment method supplemented by an exercise program, effectively reducing pain and improving functional efficiency in LBP patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9500077/ /pubmed/36138055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19980-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rajfur, Joanna
Rajfur, Katarzyna
Kosowski, Łukasz
Walewicz, Karolina
Dymarek, Robert
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Taradaj, Jakub
The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title_full The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title_fullStr The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title_short The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
title_sort effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19980-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rajfurjoanna theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT rajfurkatarzyna theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT kosowskiłukasz theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT walewiczkarolina theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT dymarekrobert theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT ptaszkowskikuba theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT taradajjakub theeffectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT rajfurjoanna effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT rajfurkatarzyna effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT kosowskiłukasz effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT walewiczkarolina effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT dymarekrobert effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT ptaszkowskikuba effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT taradajjakub effectivenessofdryneedlinginpatientswithchroniclowbackpainaprospectiverandomizedsingleblindedstudy