Cargando…

Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: In palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Consolo, Letteria, Castellini, Greta, Cilluffo, Silvia, Basile, Ilaria, Lusignani, Maura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z
_version_ 1784795144753512448
author Consolo, Letteria
Castellini, Greta
Cilluffo, Silvia
Basile, Ilaria
Lusignani, Maura
author_facet Consolo, Letteria
Castellini, Greta
Cilluffo, Silvia
Basile, Ilaria
Lusignani, Maura
author_sort Consolo, Letteria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in cancer palliative care and how PRO data collected through e-PROMs can influence the monitoring and management of symptoms and enable better communication between health professionals and patients. METHODS: A scoping review study was designed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL and gray literature sources were consulted. The inclusion criteria were people over 18 years old receiving palliative and/or end-of-life care using e-PROMs. RESULTS: Thirteen primary studies were included: nine quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two mixed-method studies. The recently developed software that supports e-PROMs allows patients to receive feedback on their symptoms, helps clinicians prioritize care needs and monitors patients’ conditions as their symptoms change. Electronic PRO data prompt difficult, end-of-life communication between clinicians and patients to better organize care in the last phase of life. CONCLUSION: This work shows that electronic PRO data assessment provides valuable tools for patients’ well-being and the management of symptoms; only one study reported conflicting results. However, with studies lacking on how clinicians can use these tools to improve communication with patients, more research is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9500127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95001272022-09-24 Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review Consolo, Letteria Castellini, Greta Cilluffo, Silvia Basile, Ilaria Lusignani, Maura J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: In palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in cancer palliative care and how PRO data collected through e-PROMs can influence the monitoring and management of symptoms and enable better communication between health professionals and patients. METHODS: A scoping review study was designed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL and gray literature sources were consulted. The inclusion criteria were people over 18 years old receiving palliative and/or end-of-life care using e-PROMs. RESULTS: Thirteen primary studies were included: nine quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two mixed-method studies. The recently developed software that supports e-PROMs allows patients to receive feedback on their symptoms, helps clinicians prioritize care needs and monitors patients’ conditions as their symptoms change. Electronic PRO data prompt difficult, end-of-life communication between clinicians and patients to better organize care in the last phase of life. CONCLUSION: This work shows that electronic PRO data assessment provides valuable tools for patients’ well-being and the management of symptoms; only one study reported conflicting results. However, with studies lacking on how clinicians can use these tools to improve communication with patients, more research is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9500127/ /pubmed/36138279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Consolo, Letteria
Castellini, Greta
Cilluffo, Silvia
Basile, Ilaria
Lusignani, Maura
Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title_full Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title_fullStr Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title_short Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
title_sort electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-proms) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z
work_keys_str_mv AT consololetteria electronicpatientreportedoutcomesepromsinpalliativecancercareascopingreview
AT castellinigreta electronicpatientreportedoutcomesepromsinpalliativecancercareascopingreview
AT cilluffosilvia electronicpatientreportedoutcomesepromsinpalliativecancercareascopingreview
AT basileilaria electronicpatientreportedoutcomesepromsinpalliativecancercareascopingreview
AT lusignanimaura electronicpatientreportedoutcomesepromsinpalliativecancercareascopingreview