Cargando…
Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely used in non-intubated COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. However, high-quality evidence to support its use in severe COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) is inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.984446 |
_version_ | 1784795165631709184 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Hui-Bin Yao, Yan Zhu, Yi-Bing Du, Bin |
author_facet | Huang, Hui-Bin Yao, Yan Zhu, Yi-Bing Du, Bin |
author_sort | Huang, Hui-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely used in non-intubated COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. However, high-quality evidence to support its use in severe COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) is inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of APP for intubation requirements and other important outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: We searched for potentially relevant articles in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception to May 25, 2022. Studies focusing on COVID-19 adults in ICU who received APP compared to controls were included. The primary outcome was the intubation requirement. Secondary outcomes were mortality, ICU stay, and adverse events. Study quality was independently assessed, and we also conducted subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias to explore the potential influence factors. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 1,686 patients were eligible. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate. Overall, the intubation rate was 35.2% in the included patients. The mean daily APP duration ranged from <6 to 9 h, with poor adherence to APP protocols. When pooling, APP significantly reduced intubation requirement (risk ratio [RR] 0.84; 95%CI, 0.74–0.95; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses confirmed the reduced intubation rates in patients who were older (≥60 years), obese, came from a high mortality risk population (>20%), received HFNC/NIV, had lower SpO(2)/FiO(2) (<150 mmHg), or undergone longer duration of APP (≥8 h). However, APP showed no beneficial effect on mortality (RR 0.92 [95% CI 0.77–1.10; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.37] and length of ICU stay (mean difference = −0.58 days; 95% CI, −2.49 to 1.32; I(2) = 63%; P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: APP significantly reduced intubation requirements in ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without affecting the outcomes of mortality and ICU stay. Further studies with better APP protocol adherence will be needed to define the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from this strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9500207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95002072022-09-24 Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis Huang, Hui-Bin Yao, Yan Zhu, Yi-Bing Du, Bin Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely used in non-intubated COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. However, high-quality evidence to support its use in severe COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) is inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of APP for intubation requirements and other important outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: We searched for potentially relevant articles in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception to May 25, 2022. Studies focusing on COVID-19 adults in ICU who received APP compared to controls were included. The primary outcome was the intubation requirement. Secondary outcomes were mortality, ICU stay, and adverse events. Study quality was independently assessed, and we also conducted subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias to explore the potential influence factors. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 1,686 patients were eligible. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate. Overall, the intubation rate was 35.2% in the included patients. The mean daily APP duration ranged from <6 to 9 h, with poor adherence to APP protocols. When pooling, APP significantly reduced intubation requirement (risk ratio [RR] 0.84; 95%CI, 0.74–0.95; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses confirmed the reduced intubation rates in patients who were older (≥60 years), obese, came from a high mortality risk population (>20%), received HFNC/NIV, had lower SpO(2)/FiO(2) (<150 mmHg), or undergone longer duration of APP (≥8 h). However, APP showed no beneficial effect on mortality (RR 0.92 [95% CI 0.77–1.10; I(2) = 0%, P = 0.37] and length of ICU stay (mean difference = −0.58 days; 95% CI, −2.49 to 1.32; I(2) = 63%; P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: APP significantly reduced intubation requirements in ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without affecting the outcomes of mortality and ICU stay. Further studies with better APP protocol adherence will be needed to define the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from this strategy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9500207/ /pubmed/36160173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.984446 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Yao, Zhu and Du. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Huang, Hui-Bin Yao, Yan Zhu, Yi-Bing Du, Bin Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Awake prone positioning for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | awake prone positioning for patients with covid-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.984446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huanghuibin awakepronepositioningforpatientswithcovid19pneumoniainintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yaoyan awakepronepositioningforpatientswithcovid19pneumoniainintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuyibing awakepronepositioningforpatientswithcovid19pneumoniainintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dubin awakepronepositioningforpatientswithcovid19pneumoniainintensivecareunitasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |