Cargando…
Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort
OBJECTIVE: The number of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) procedures has been increasing in China. This study aimed to investigate the oncological safety of IBR, and to compare the survival and surgical outcomes between implant-based and autologous reconstruction. METHODS: Data from patients di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Compuscript
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0368 |
_version_ | 1784795170227617792 |
---|---|
author | He, Shanshan Ding, Bowen Li, Gang Huang, Yubei Han, Chunyong Sun, Jingyan Huang, Qingfeng Liu, Jing Yin, Zhuming Wang, Shu Yin, Jian |
author_facet | He, Shanshan Ding, Bowen Li, Gang Huang, Yubei Han, Chunyong Sun, Jingyan Huang, Qingfeng Liu, Jing Yin, Zhuming Wang, Shu Yin, Jian |
author_sort | He, Shanshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The number of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) procedures has been increasing in China. This study aimed to investigate the oncological safety of IBR, and to compare the survival and surgical outcomes between implant-based and autologous reconstruction. METHODS: Data from patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who underwent immediate total breast reconstruction between 2001 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the breast was compared between the implant-based and autologous groups. BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were compared between groups after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 784 IBR procedures were identified, of which 584 were performed on patients with invasive breast cancer (implant-based, n = 288; autologous, n = 296). With a median follow-up of 71.3 months, the 10-year estimates of BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were 88.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) (85.1%–93.0%)], 79.6% [95% CI (74.7%–84.8%)], and 94.0% [95% CI (90.3%–97.8%)], respectively. A total of 124 patients completed the Breast-Q questionnaire, and no statistically significant differences were noted between groups (P = 0.823). After PSM with 27 variables, no statistically significant differences in BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were found between the implant-based (n = 177) and autologous (n = 177) groups. Further stratification according to staging, histological grade, lymph node status, and lymph-venous invasion status revealed no significant survival differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction were reasonable choices with similar long-term oncological outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction among patients with invasive breast cancer in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9500225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Compuscript |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95002252022-10-21 Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort He, Shanshan Ding, Bowen Li, Gang Huang, Yubei Han, Chunyong Sun, Jingyan Huang, Qingfeng Liu, Jing Yin, Zhuming Wang, Shu Yin, Jian Cancer Biol Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The number of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) procedures has been increasing in China. This study aimed to investigate the oncological safety of IBR, and to compare the survival and surgical outcomes between implant-based and autologous reconstruction. METHODS: Data from patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who underwent immediate total breast reconstruction between 2001 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the breast was compared between the implant-based and autologous groups. BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were compared between groups after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 784 IBR procedures were identified, of which 584 were performed on patients with invasive breast cancer (implant-based, n = 288; autologous, n = 296). With a median follow-up of 71.3 months, the 10-year estimates of BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were 88.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) (85.1%–93.0%)], 79.6% [95% CI (74.7%–84.8%)], and 94.0% [95% CI (90.3%–97.8%)], respectively. A total of 124 patients completed the Breast-Q questionnaire, and no statistically significant differences were noted between groups (P = 0.823). After PSM with 27 variables, no statistically significant differences in BCSS, DFS, and LRFS were found between the implant-based (n = 177) and autologous (n = 177) groups. Further stratification according to staging, histological grade, lymph node status, and lymph-venous invasion status revealed no significant survival differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction were reasonable choices with similar long-term oncological outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction among patients with invasive breast cancer in China. Compuscript 2022-09-15 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9500225/ /pubmed/34846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0368 Text en Copyright: © 2022, Cancer Biology & Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article He, Shanshan Ding, Bowen Li, Gang Huang, Yubei Han, Chunyong Sun, Jingyan Huang, Qingfeng Liu, Jing Yin, Zhuming Wang, Shu Yin, Jian Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title | Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title_full | Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title_fullStr | Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title_short | Comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched Chinese cohort |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes between immediate implant-based and autologous reconstruction: 15-year, single-center experience in a propensity score-matched chinese cohort |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9500225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846109 http://dx.doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heshanshan comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT dingbowen comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT ligang comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT huangyubei comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT hanchunyong comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT sunjingyan comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT huangqingfeng comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT liujing comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT yinzhuming comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT wangshu comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort AT yinjian comparisonofoutcomesbetweenimmediateimplantbasedandautologousreconstruction15yearsinglecenterexperienceinapropensityscorematchedchinesecohort |